Translation Procedures of Disease Terms in the Glossary of Medicine, Technology, and Sport 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.11579Keywords:
disease terminology, Medical Terminology, newmark's translation procedures, translation proceduresAbstract
This study investigates the translation procedures applied to disease terminology within a non-narrative glossary environment, where terms are presented as isolated lexical entries without supporting sentence context. Disease terminology was selected because it presents distinctive translation challenges arising from lexical gaps, standardized international nomenclature, and culturally established vernacular equivalents. Using Peter Newmark's taxonomy of translation procedures, this qualitative descriptive study analyzes 31 disease-related terms extracted from the Glossary of Medicine, Technology, and Sport (2025). The findings reveal that source-oriented procedures dominate the dataset, with Naturalization emerging as the most frequently applied strategy, followed by Transference, while Functional Equivalent is employed for terms with well-established vernacular counterparts. Through-Translation and Couplets occur less frequently and are primarily used to preserve the structural and semantic integrity of complex medical expressions. The findings further indicate that the selection of translation procedures is closely related to the presence or absence of target-language equivalents. While glossary translation generally prioritizes terminological consistency and scientific precision, target-oriented procedures are selectively employed to improve reader accessibility when culturally familiar expressions already exist. These findings contribute to translation studies by demonstrating how translators balance standardized medical terminology with reader comprehension in glossary-based translation and provide practical insights for translators and glossary compilers working with specialized medical terminology.
References
Abdullah, M. R. (2025). Morphological analysis and translation strategies of technical medical vocabulary. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22(1), 45–58.
Farahsani, I., Maziya, N., & Nababan, M. R. (2022). Technical and terminological consistency in the translation of specialized scientific texts. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(2), 412–425.
Farhan, A. K. (2023). Divergence in the translation of criminal law: A corpus-based study of prohibition in Iraqi penal code and its English translation. Ampersand, 10, Article 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100104
Frihatmawati, T., Mulya, D., & Setiawan, B. (2024). Pragmatic adaptations in audiovisual and subtitle translations: A audience-centered approach. Review of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 201–215.
Glossary of Medicine, Technology, and Sport. (2025).
Ismayanti, D., Said, Y. R., Usman, N., & Nur, M. I. (2024). The Students Ability in Translating Newspaper Headlines into English A Case Study. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(1), 108-131.
Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.
Molina, L., & Albir, A. H. (2002). "Translation Techniques Revisited: A Dynamic and Functionalist Approach." Meta, 47(4), 498–512.
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice-Hall International.
Pradiptha, R., & Hasibuan, A. (2026). Pragmatic adaptations and contextual challenges in non-narrative technical translations. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 512–527.
Putri, A. S. (2022). Evaluating the translation of medical terms in bilingual health brochures: A reader-oriented analysis. Lingua Cultura, 16(1), 89–98.
Radetska, S. (2024). Challenges and innovations in scientific and technical translation: Terminological complexities and 'false friends'. The Modern Higher Education Review, (9), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.28925/2617-5266/2024.97
Susanthi, I. G. A. (2023). Semantic precision and knowledge transfer challenges in English for science and technology translation. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 4(2), 75–88.
Valufi, E., & Noverino, R. (2022). Medical term translation techniques analysis on Five Feet Apart novel. International Journal of Translation and Interpretation Studies, 2(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijtis.2022.2.1.4
Virtianti, R., Utami, S., & Ramadhan, F. (2024). Cultural transcreation and shifts in contemporary literary translation. Journal of Humanity and Translation, 14(1), 34–49.
Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation (J. C. Sager, Ed.; J. C. Sager, Trans.). J. Benjamins.
World Health Organization. (2025). International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases
Yesi, P., Rahayu, S., & Kurniawan, H. (2021). Systemic constraints and reader backgrounds in translation decision-making. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 15(2), 118–129.
Yuan, C. L., & Guo, P. Y. (2022). The application of Newmark's text typology theory in medical translation. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 12(4), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2022.124031
Yudha, G. T. (2022). An analysis of the translation procedures used by Digital Happiness. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 15(2), 219–232.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Made Wira Afrian, Ni Made Verayanti Utami

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
