This is an outdated version published on 2026-07-16. Read the most recent version.

Interconnections Among Linguistics, Sociolinguistics, and Forensic Linguistics in Legal Contexts: a Qualitative Literature Review

Authors

  • Rezki Amalia Wahyuni Mustakim Universitas Bisowa, Indonesia
  • Fitri Arniati Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong , Indonesia
  • Muh. Syahrul Ago Universitas Bosowa , Indonesia
  • Nurlely Nasaruddin Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong , Indonesia
  • Hendrik Johan Posuma Universitas Bosowa , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.11843

Keywords:

forensic linguistics, language and law, linguistics and sociolinguistics

Abstract

Language-related questions in legal settings require an analysis that connects linguistic form with social context and institutional meaning. This conceptual study examines the interconnections among general linguistics, sociolinguistics, and forensic linguistics and explains their relevance to legal analysis. It employs a qualitative descriptive design and a literature review of books, journal articles, and other academic sources concerning the three fields. The sources are synthesized conceptually to identify their principal objects of analysis, areas of contribution, and relationships within legal contexts. The review identifies four connected themes. First, linguistics provides analytical tools for examining language structure, meaning, and use. Second, sociolinguistics explains how identity, social relationships, language variation, power, and communicative context influence language choices. Third, forensic linguistics applies these insights to legal texts, disputed authorship, recorded interaction, and the interpretation of potentially ambiguous or harmful expressions. Fourth, sociolinguistic context is necessary to reduce decontextualized interpretations of linguistic evidence. The analysis indicates that linguistic evidence is most informative when structural features are considered together with speaker relationships, communicative circumstances, and institutional norms. Nevertheless, linguistic analysis should support rather than replace broader legal evaluation because language interpretation is context-dependent and may involve uncertainty. The study offers a concise conceptual framework for understanding the complementary roles of the three fields in legal settings

References

Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2014). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan awal. Rineka Cipta.

Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2017). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Coulthard, M., May, A., & Sousa-Silva, R. (Eds.). (2021). The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Finegan, E. (2010). Language: Its structure and use. Cengage Learning.

Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.

Masruddin, M., & Munawir, A. (2022). The efficacy of treasure hunt game with Luwu local culture based in teaching English vocabulary and introducing cultures heritages of Luwu at SMPIT Al Hafidz Kota Palopo. Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia, 204–208. https://doi.org/10.51817/kimli.vi.51

Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2023.2001556.3018

Masrudin, M. (2013). Influenced factors towards the language shift phenomenon of Wotunese. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 25(2), 162–192. https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v25i2.4138

Munawir, A. (2019). Online game and children’s language behavior. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 7(2), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v7i2.1050

Olsson, J. (2004). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language, crime and the law. Continuum.

Zainuddin, A. H. A., Masruddin, M., & Thayyib, M. (2024). Multilingualism in Bugis language context: A case study on English language teaching interactions. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v5i1.156

Published

2026-07-16

Versions

Citation Check