The Types of Slang Words Used in the Chat Feature of Mobile Legends Game
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.12005Keywords:
Sociolinguistic, Slang, Mobile LegendsAbstract
Slang has become an essential feature of communication in online gaming, allowing players to exchange information quickly and efficiently during gameplay. However, studies examining the linguistic characteristics of slang in Mobile Legends chat remain limited. Therefore, this study aims to identify, classify, and analyze the frequency of slang words used by players in the chat feature of Mobile Legends. This research employed a descriptive qualitative method. The data were collected from chat interactions in nine Mobile Legends matches conducted between April 13 and May 21, 2026, using observation and documentation techniques through screenshots of in-game conversations. The data were analyzed by classifying the slang words into four categories based on the theoretical framework utilized in this study: acronyms, abbreviations, clippings, and game-specific slang. The findings identified a total of 77 slang words, consisting of 35 acronyms, 27 game-specific slang terms, 10 clippings, and 5 abbreviations. Acronyms were the most frequently used type because they enabled players to communicate rapidly in a fast-paced gaming environment, while game-specific slang reflected players’ shared understanding of game mechanics and strategies. The findings indicate that slang functions not only as an efficient communication tool but also as a linguistic marker of identity within the Mobile Legends gaming community. This study contributes to sociolinguistic research by providing empirical evidence of the use and variation of slang in online gaming communication.
References
Al-Ghizzy, M. J. D. (2018). Linguistic features of netspeak: Abbreviations, acronyms and punctuation marks. Journal of the College of Education for Humanities, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.32792/jedh.v8i2.145
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2011). Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence. In Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 145–161). Novus Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Budiasa, I. G. M., Astawa, I. N., & Artini, N. N. (2021). Sociolinguistics and language variation in society.
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Eble, C. (2012). Slang and sociability: In-group language among college students. University of North Carolina Press.
Fawaid, F. N., Hieu, H. N., Wulandari, R., & Iswatiningsih, D. (2021). Penggunaan bahasa gaul pada remaja milenial di media sosial. Literasi: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia serta Pembelajarannya, 5(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.25157/literasi.v5i1.4969
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2018). An Introduction to Language (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hamidah, A. A. A., Rosalina, S., & Triyadi, S. (2023). Kajian sosiolinguistik ragam bahasa gaul di media sosial TikTok pada masa pandemi Covid-19 dan pemanfaatannya sebagai kamus bahasa gaul. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 9(1), 61–68.
Iswatiningsih, D., Fauzan, F., & Pangesti, F. (2021). Ekspresi remaja milenial melalui penggunaan bahasa gaul di sosial media. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 7(2), 476–489.
Marni, N., Wijana, I. D. P., & Poedjosoedarmo, S. (2024). Language variation and its characteristics in society.
Pitrianti, S., & Maryani, S. (2023). Analisis bahasa slang di media sosial Instagram. Jurnal Ilmiah Semantik, 5(1), 9–16.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif (untuk penelitian yang bersifat: eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif, dan konstruktif).
Sulaeman, A., & Dwihudhana, R. (2019). Language as a unifying tool in society: A sociolinguistic perspective.
Syaiful Hamzah, M., Anggraeni, D., & Pratama, R. (2023). Slang as a means of emotional expression and group solidarity in modern communication.
Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 83(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001
Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An introduction to sociolinguistics (6th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Zahra Tasyarasita, A., Duhita, M. E., Yulianti, W., & Yustanto, H. (2023). Ragam bahasa slang oleh remaja Gen Z pada media sosial TikTok (kajian sosiolinguistik). Translation and Linguistics (Transling), 3(2), 98–109.
Zhou, Y., & Fan, Y. (2013). Functions and forms of abbreviation, clipping, and acronym in online communication.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lasma, Meristika Moetia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
