Needs Analysis on The Infusion of Eco-Literacy in English Reading: MNC University Students’ Voice

Authors

  • Neni Nurkhamidah English Education Program, Universitas Media Nusantara Citra, Jakarta , Indonesia
  • Priskila Go English Education Program, Universitas Media Nusantara Citra, Jakarta , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.8258

Keywords:

Eco-literacy, English Reading Instruction, Needs Analysis, Thematic Analysis, Qualitative Research

Abstract

In response to the growing call for sustainable development and climate education, particularly in alignment with Sustainable Development Goal 13, this study explores students’ needs regarding the infusion of eco-literacy into English reading instruction. Although environmental themes have been introduced in the curriculum, little is known about how students experience and respond to eco-literacy in reading classes, which serve as a key input skill in language learning. This research aims to fill that gap by investigating the learning needs of English Education students at MNC University. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected through open-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key patterns in participant responses. The results revealed six major themes: (1) Environmental Awareness & Responsibility, (2) Language Development, (3) Relevance & Real-Life Connection, (4) Engaging & Interactive Learning, (5) Student-Centered Learning, and (6) Variations of Topic. Participants preferred reading materials that are environmentally relevant, cognitively engaging, and linguistically accessible. These findings indicate that eco-literacy can enrich English reading instruction by fostering both language competence and environmental awareness. The study highlights the importance of designing student-centered, contextually relevant materials to ensure meaningful integration of sustainability in language education.

References

Adams, A., & Cox, A. L. (2008). Questionnaires, in-depth interviews and focus groups. Cambridge University Press.

Alyani, E., Nargis, & Gunawan, Y. I. (2024). Teachers’ Perspective on Addressing Environmental Issue in English Language Learning. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 17(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.32678/loquen.v17i2.10718

Amalia, D. (2024). The Integration of Eco-Literacy in Teaching-Learning Activities as An Effort to Reduce Environmental Crisis. Madinah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 11(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.58518/madinah.v11i2.2962

Ananda, D. A. F., Pambayun, R. N., & Husna, I. (2025). Students’ Perception of The Role Of Youtube Videos As A Learning Source For Improving Their Vocabulary Skills In Senior High School. EDUSAINTEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Dan Teknologi, 12(3), 1248–1266. https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v12i3.1714

Angraini, D., Putra, W., Masurai, P., Wahyudi, L., & Firman. (2024). A Reading Teacher’s Perspective in Constructing the Students’ Critical Thinking. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 5(1), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v5i1.1118

Basya, D., & Maulidia, B. A. (2024). How does Indonesian Secondary-ELT Textbook Shape Environmental Consciousness? An Ecocritical Discourse Analysis. Proceedings of English Linguistics and Literature, 4, 91–107.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, J. D. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum: A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Heinle & Heinle Publishers, 20 Park Plaza, Boston, MA 02116.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.

Budiyanti, L., & Adji, R. (2024, August 20). School curriculum covering climate change to stimulate action: Govt. Antara News. https://en.antaranews.com/news/323123/school-curriculum-covering-climate-change-to-stimulate-action-govt

Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new synthesis of mind and matter (Vol. 132). London: HarperCollins.

Caulfield, J. (2023, June 22). How to Do Thematic Analysis: Step-by-Step Guide & Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis/

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Development of Environmental Education through the Merdeka Curriculum on the Ogan Komering Ilir Coast, South Sumatra. (2023, November 15). Yayasan Konservasi Alam Nusantara (YKAN). https://www.ykan.or.id/en/publications/articles/press-release/development-of-environmental-education-through-merdeka-curriculum

Hasan, A. M., & Hasan, Z. F. (2019). Students’ Perception towards Literature Integration in the English Language Departments at Duhok and Zakho Universities. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(4), 130. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.4p.130

Indonesia | Global Environmental Education Partnership (GEEP). (n.d.). Global Environmental Education Partnership (GEEP). Retrieved June 22, 2025, from https://thegeep.org/resources/countries/indonesia

Kazazoglu, S. (2025). Environmental Education Through Eco-Literacy: Integrating Sustainability into English Language Teaching. Sustainability, 17(5), 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052156

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. sage.

McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674

Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2019). Language Curriculum Design. Routledge.

Nurkhamidah, N. (2024). Green Minds, Future Teachers: Exploring English Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions On Green Education. EDUSAINTEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Dan Teknologi, 12(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v12i1.1411

Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Suny Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Pratiwi, P. I., Ramadhani, D., & Mayuni, L. (2024). Implementations Of Eco-Literacy in English Language Teaching for Smart Society Era: A Critical Review. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 10(2), 1493–1505. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i2.3543

Rachmadanti, A., Subroto, W. T., & Nafisah, D. (2025). Portrait of the Implementation of the Pancasila Student Profile Strengthening Project (P5) in the Sustainable Lifestyle Theme in Elementary Schools. MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v10i1.77660

Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5(1), 8–15.

Richset, J. R., Habaora, F., Susanto, Y., Maria Fuah, A., Priyanto, R., Abdullah, L., Yani, A., & Priyo Purwanto, B. (2020). Falsafah Science of Fritjof Capra in Handling the Environment Destruction. American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 5(6), 103. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13

Riordan, M., & Klein, E. J. (2010). Environmental education in action: How expeditionary learning schools support classroom teachers in tackling ıssues of sustainability. . Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(4), 119–137.

Suparman, Yadnya, I. B. P., Simpen, I. W., & Satyawati, M. S. (2021). English Reading Texts Model Using the Ecoliteracy Lexicons Approach. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(4), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.4.15

Suwandi, S., Drajati, N. A., Handayani, A., & Tyarakanita, A. (2024). The analysis of Ecoliteracy elements in language textbooks. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2300907

Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection.

Yıldırım, M., & Aytan, T. (2025). Greening Language Learning Pathways: Three Sustainable Practices Using the STAR Framework. Sustainability, 17(5), 2046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052046

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07

Citation Check