Affective Dimensions of Language Testing: Insight from Participants in the Duolingo English Practice Test
Keywords:
affective elements, Duolingo English Practice Test ,digital language testing, EFL learners, low-stakes assessmentAbstract
This study examines the affective experiences of EFL learners when taking the Duolingo English Practice Test (DEPT). Using a qualitative descriptive approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with five Indonesian EFL undergraduate students and analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings indicate recurring affective themes across participants namely test anxiety, motivation, self-confidence, attitudes toward the test, and perceived personal value while also showing individual variations in intensity. Initial anxiety, particularly in speaking and listening tasks, was commonly reported but tended to diminish as learners became familiar with the test format. The low-stakes nature of the DEPT encouraged positive attitudes, sustained motivation, and realistic self-assessment of English proficiency. Interpreted through Self-Determination Theory, these affective experiences were shaped by learners’ perceptions of autonomy and competence. The study highlights the potential of low-stakes digital practice tests as formative tools and offers implications for educators and test designers to integrate affective considerations into digital language assessment.
References
Abderrahim, M. (2025). A New Post Covid-19 Era for EFL : Using Technological Tools to Enhance EFL Learning by Djelfa University Students. 02.
Fathi, J., & Mohammaddokht, F. (2021). Foreign Language Enjoyment and Anxiety as the Correlates of the Ideal L2 Self in the English as a Foreign Language Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790648
Hartono, D. A. (2019). Investigating the Relationship between Test-Taking Anxiety and Test-Takersâ€TM Performance on the IELTS Test. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v4i1.282
Kiran, A. (2023). English Language Assessment: Innovations, Validity, And Reliability. Journal of International English Research Studies, 1(2), 1–8. https://languagejournals.com/index.php/englishjournal/article/view/8
Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985
Mehrotra, S. (2025). Emotional Responses to Artificial Intelligence Systems : A Systematic Review. March.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(April), 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Wagner, E. (2020). Duolingo English Test, Revised Version July 2019. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(3), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1771343
Zhang, D., Hoang, T., Pan, S., Hu, Y., Xing, Z., Staples, M., Xu, X., Lu, Q., & Quigley, A. (2023). Test-takers have a say: understanding the implications of the use of AI in language tests. 1–26. http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09885
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rika Lufiasari, Andi Rachmawati Syarif, Ririn Syahriani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
