Dynamic of Teacher-Student Interaction in Fastering an Engaging Learning Environment Towards Students’ Participation and Happiness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.9244Keywords:
Classroom Communication, Emotional Support, Qualitative Engagement, Teacher Student InteractionAbstract
This study aims to analyze the dynamics of teacher–student interactions and their impact on student engagement and happiness in the learning process at SMA Negeri 1 Tirawuta, Indonesia. In recent years, positive communication and emotional support in classroom settings have become increasingly important in fostering engaging and enjoyable learning environments, particularly at the secondary school level. This study employed a qualitative descriptive design involving seven teachers selected through a purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns of interaction, instructional strategies, and emotional dynamics influencing students’ participation in learning activities. The findings reveal that positive teacher–student interactions,such as emotional support, the use of open-ended questions, collaborative group discussions, and formative assessment practices play a crucial role in enhancing student participation, emotional comfort, and happiness in the classroom. In this study, qualitative engagement refers to students’ meaningful involvement in learning processes, reflected through active participation, emotional responsiveness, and a sense of psychological safety. However, several challenges were also identified, including differences in students’ academic abilities, limited school facilities, and low levels of student self-confidence, which hinder the effectiveness of interactive learning practices. This study concludes that responsive communication, adaptive instructional strategies, and sustained emotional support are essential components in creating a supportive and engaging learning environment. The findings contribute theoretically by enriching the discourse on teacher–student interactions through an emotional perspective and practically by providing insights for teachers and school stakeholders to integrate emotional aspects into classroom interaction practices to enhance student engagement and well-being.
References
Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: Evidence from high- and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093
Amanah, A., & Dewi, R. S. (2025). Enhancing English Language Acquisition in Young Learners Through Experiential Learning Activities. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(1), 2623-2635.
Asdar, A., Nasir, S.H, Kiftiah, S., Safei, N. H., & Hartina, S. (2025). Accelerating students’ expository text writing ability in Physical Education utilizing ChatGPT. Retos, 69, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v69.113078
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. The Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
Etikan, I., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Feng, Y., Ren, Y., & Wang, H. (2018). Effects of mobile learning on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Blended Learning (pp. 115–123). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8896-4_10
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Maulana, R. S., Azkiyah, S. N., & Dewi, R. S. (2025). The Language of Success: A Needs Analysis of the Ideal English for Business Learning Program Based on Professional Insights. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(1), 1638-1658.
Nasir, S. H., Helvira, V., Kiftiah, S., Bohang, M. B. A., & Nurlinda. (2026). Penguatan literasi leksikal Bahasa Inggris bagi generasi muda di daerah 3T Desa Congko dengan metode Gamified Polyglot Quizziz. Abdimas Toddopuli: Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 7(2), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.30605/atjpm.v7i2.7621
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Pennings, H. J. M., & Hollenstein, T. (2020). Teacher–student interactions and teacher interpersonal styles: A state space grid analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 88(3), 382–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1578724
Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2017). Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3
Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–20.
Sandelowski, M. (2015). A matter of taste: Evaluating the quality of qualitative research. Nursing Inquiry, 22(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12080
Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Bjereld, Y. (2022). Teacher–student relationship quality and student engagement: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864772
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wildatulrahmah, Karimuddin, Syarif Hidayat Nasir, Roslina, Susi Astiantih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
