Trends of Humane Literacy in EFL Assessment as an Alternative for Future Learning: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.9656Keywords:
EFL assessment, formative assessment, 21st century skills, holistic assessment, humane literacy, humanistic education, language assessment literacyAbstract
Traditional EFL assessment prioritises cognitive and linguistic outcomes, neglecting the affective, ethical, and sociocultural dimensions essential to holistic language development. This study examines publication trends and thematic patterns of humane literacy integration in EFL assessment (2013–2023). Following PRISMA guidelines, five databases (Google Scholar, ERIC, Lens.org, Connected Papers, Open Knowledge) were systematically searched; 23 peer-reviewed articles met inclusion criteria and were analyzed through thematic synthesis appraised using the CASP qualitative checklist. Publication peaks in 2018 (n = 7) and 2023 (n = 4) reflect sustained scholarly interest. Thematic synthesis identified five core humane literacy value factors: comprehensive literacy skills integration, cultural and contextual awareness, critical thinking and ethical reasoning, creativity and innovation, and collaboration and communication. Findings propose "humanistic assessment literacy" as an expanded framework for EFL teachers and advocate portfolio assessment, culturally responsive rubrics, and peer evaluation as congruent classroom practices. Curriculum reform and targeted teacher training are recommended to bridge humanistic ideals and institutional assessment policy.
References
ACTFL. (2011). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century (3rd ed.). American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
Arnold, J. (1998). Towards more humanistic English teaching. ELT Journal, 52(3), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.3.235
Asnawi, A. (2017). Pemanfaatan humanistik dalam Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Membaca. GERAM, 5(2), 53–61.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Bolívar, E., & Restrepo, M. (2020). Monitoring preservice teachers' language assessment literacy development through journal writing. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 17, 38–52.
CASP. (2018). CASP qualitative checklist. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf
Challenger, C. D. (2022). School counseling for college and career readiness using the existential theory model: A humanistic approach to counseling students of color in urban school settings. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 61(3), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/johc.12184
Chan, C. K., & Luk, L. Y. (2022). A four-dimensional framework for teacher assessment literacy in holistic competencies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1987105
Coombe, C., Vafadar, H., & Mohebbi, H. (2020). Language assessment literacy: What do we need to learn, unlearn, and relearn? Language Testing in Asia, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00101-6
Dixon, C., Oxley, E., Nash, H., & Gellert, A. S. (2023). Does dynamic assessment offer an alternative approach to identifying reading disorders? A systematic review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(6), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221137879
Fadillah, E. N., Saridah, S., Kamilasari, M., Nur’aida, A., Hafizudin, Hafizudin, Kamilia, A., & Sulaeman, D. (2025). Enhancing Prior Knowledge Development in English Language Education through ChatGPT-Assisted Learning. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(1), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i1.13356
Frontiers in Education. (2025). The influence of humanistic education on tertiary English teachers' writing assessment practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1605368. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1605368
Gu, P. Y. (2020). Formative assessment for self-regulated learning: Evidence from a teacher continuing professional development program. System, 94, 102339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102339
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Khatib, M. (2013). Humanistic education: Concerns, implications, and applications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr. 4.1.45-51
Lam, R. (2019). Writing portfolio assessment in practice: Individual, institutional, and systemic issues. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 14(3), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2019.1597294
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Li, M., Yu, Z., & Wang, T. (2024). Formative assessment in K-12 English as a foreign language education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(10), e30767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30767
Mukhlis, M., Asnawi, A., & Rasdana, O. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Teks Eksposisi Berbasis Tunjuk Ajar Melayu. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 9(2), 97–102.
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n. 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). Framework for 21st-century learning. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: The nature of critical and creative thought. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Popham, W. J. (2011). Transformative assessment in action: An inside look at applying the process. ASCD.
Ralph, S. (2022). Brief humanistic counseling with an adolescent client experiencing obsessive-compulsive difficulties: A theory-building case study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 22(3), 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12499
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Safio, P. K., Jediut, M., & Robe, M. (2020). Pengaruh Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Humanistik terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Katolik Siswa. Jurnal Literasi, 1(2), 8–13. DOI:10.47134/jtp.v1i2.162
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.
Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2022). A review of research on technology-supported language learning and 21st-century skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 13,
Sulaeman, D., Fadillah, E. N., Ridwan, T., Santika, R., Salsabila, I. N., & Setiawan, D. (2024). EFL Learners’ Attitudes on the Use of ICT-Based Learning as an Effort in Improving English Language Achievement. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(3), 1573–1583. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i3.11388
Sun, N., & Izadpanah, S. (2025). The role of formative assessment and corrective feedback in shaping the meaning of education, academic hardiness, and love of learning among English foreign language learners. Psychological Reports, 128(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251350213
The following consolidated list removes duplicates and presents all references cited in the Discussion (Parts A–D) in a single alphabetically ordered APA 7th edition list, ready for integration into the manuscript.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tomlinson, B. (2003). Humanizing the coursebook. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 162–173). Continuum.
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wahyuni, S., Asnawi, A., Zulaeha, I., & Rasdana, O. (2019). Development of Pictorial Anecdotal Text Materials as an Alternative Language Learning Tool.
Wang, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2025). Unraveling the mechanisms and effectiveness of AI-assisted feedback in education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1234–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.104684
Xu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025). Language assessment literacy for teachers. In Z. Tajeddin & T. S. Farrell (Eds.), Handbook of language teacher education (pp. 351–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47310-4_16
Zulaeha, I., et al. (2022). Human literacy in language education: A conceptual framework. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2579–2588.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shilvy Inayatillah, Nurul Syafika, Siti Drivoka Sulistyaningrum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
