Teachers’ Voices on the Transition from Curriculum 2013 to Kurikulum Merdeka in Indonesian Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.9938Keywords:
curriculum reform; elementary education; Kurikulum Merdeka; teacher perception.Abstract
Curriculum reform is a continuous process aimed at improving educational quality and responding to evolving societal needs. In Indonesia, the transition from Curriculum 2013 (K13) to Kurikulum Merdeka represents a major shift toward flexible, competency-based learning. However, the success of such reforms largely depends on teachers who serve as the primary implementers of curriculum policies. This study aims to explore elementary school teachers’ perceptions, challenges, and recommendations regarding the transition from K13 to Kurikulum Merdeka in Kendari, Indonesia. The research employed a descriptive survey design involving 31 public elementary school teachers who had experience teaching under both curricula. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire consisting of 25 items and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. The findings indicate that most teachers perceive Kurikulum Merdeka positively, particularly appreciating its flexibility in lesson planning and its emphasis on essential learning content. Nevertheless, teachers reported several challenges during implementation, including limited time, insufficient training, and inadequate school resources. Despite these challenges, the majority of respondents expressed strong support for the new curriculum and believed it has the potential to improve the quality of learning. Teachers also recommended increased professional development opportunities, collaborative teacher forums, and clearer implementation guidelines from education authorities. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating teachers’ voices into curriculum reform processes to ensure sustainable and effective implementation of Kurikulum Merdeka.
References
Afida, N. (2024). Diverse meanings in Merdeka curriculum adoption: A phenomenological study across Indonesian schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(1), 45–62.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Candra, G. E. (2024). Teachers' interpretation of the Merdeka curriculum as a policy diffusion process. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(2), 123–140.
Dewi, S., & Susanti, D. (2023). Curriculum implementation challenges in non-Java regions: English teachers' perspectives. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan, 10(1), 78–95.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Harahap, R. J., & Siagian, H. (2023). Persepsi guru terhadap implementasi Kurikulum 2013 di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 145–158.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Panduan implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek
Nur, A., & Nasir, M. (2023). Regional disparities in Kurikulum Merdeka implementation: Evidence from Sulawesi. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 12(3), 456–472.
Robinson, V. (2012). Student-centered leadership and teacher professional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 456–478.
Swaffield, S. (2025). Teacher agency in curriculum reform: Global perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 57(1), 45–67.
Telaumbanua, D. (2024). Analisis perubahan strategi pembelajaran dari Kurikulum 2013 ke Kurikulum Merdeka. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 1(1), 1–15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Novita Purnamasari Rahayu, Andi Rachmawati Syarif, Syarif Amin, Maulina, Sam Hermansyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
