Game-Based Discussion: Enhancing Critical Speaking, Confidence, and Accuracy in the EFL Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.9941Keywords:
game-based discussion; EFL speaking skills; communicative confidence; interactional participation; critical speaking; quasi-experimental study.Abstract
This study examined the effectiveness of game-based discussion, defined as structured speaking tasks that use role cards, evidence tokens, timed problem solving, and peer rotation to guide argumentative interaction, in enhancing critical speaking, confidence, and linguistic accuracy in EFL classrooms. Using a quasi-experimental design, 156 secondary students in East Java, Indonesia, were assigned by intact classes to experimental and comparison groups. Data were collected through pre- and post-speaking tests assessed with analytic rubrics, questionnaires, classroom observations, and semi-structured interviews. Results showed that the experimental group achieved large gains in critical speaking (M = 62.45 to 78.12, d = 1.98), confidence (M = 58.77 to 75.56, d = 1.87), and accuracy (M = 60.33 to 74.45, d = 1.83), with all gains statistically significant at p < .001 and stronger than those in conventional instruction. The novelty of the study lies in integrating cognitive, affective, and linguistic dimensions within one instructional model rather than treating speaking fluency or motivation as isolated outcomes. Lexical precision and syntactic control were still developing under spontaneous pressure, but guided feedback and peer scaffolding supported gradual improvement. The findings offer practical implications for EFL teachers and curriculum developers seeking interactive, measurable, and learner-centered speaking instruction.
References
Afshar, H. S., & Jamshidi, B. (2022). EFL learners’ language learning strategy use, instrumental motivation, self-efficacy, self-regulation, autonomy, and L2 achievement: A SEM analysis. Applied Research on English Language, 11(4), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2022.133123.1880
Ahmed, A. A. A., Sayed, B. T., Wekke, I. S., Widodo, M., Rostikawati, D., Ali, M. H., Abdul Hussein, H. A., & Azizian, M. (2022). An empirical study on the effects of using Kahoot as a game-based learning tool on EFL learners’ vocabulary recall and retention. Education Research International, 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9739147
Alimorad, Z., & Saleki, A. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of web-based assessment in EFL courses as perceived by different stakeholders. Applied Research on English Language, 11(2), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2022.132413.1843
Al-Rashidi, A. H., Asif, M., Vanani, M. G., & Aberash, A. (2022). Learner-oriented assessment (LOA) practice: The comparative study of self-assessment, peer assessment, and teacher assessment on EFL learners’ writing complicity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF), speaking CAF, and attitude. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00209-x
Alshammri, A. F. (2023). Perceptions of Saudi EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in the extramural digital context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(8), 1920–1930. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1308.07
Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., Kharis, M., & Slamet, J. (2025). Gamifying English proficiency: A needs analysis for EFL student course design. Online Learning Journal, 29(2), 241–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i2.4506
Bouncken, R. B., Czakon, W., & Schmitt, F. (2025). Purposeful sampling and saturation in qualitative research methodologies: Recommendations and review. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00881-2
Braun, H. I., Shavelson, R. J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Borowiec, K. (2020). Performance assessment of critical thinking: Conceptualization, design, and implementation. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00156
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chen, Y. (2024a). Effects of technology-enhanced language learning on reducing EFL learners’ public speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 789–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2055083
Chen, Y. (2024b). Effects of technology-enhanced language learning on reducing EFL learners’ public speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 789–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2055083
Correia, R. C. (2024). Rethinking speaking in ELT: Where does intelligibility stand in the EFL classroom? Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 37(2), e24026. https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.32003
Erdiana, L., Dziqy, A. N. A., Farouq, A. Al, & Slamet, J. (2025). Enhancing listening comprehension in non-English majors through AI-integrated gamified formative assessment. Applied Research on English Language, 14(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2025.144695.2475
Ferdiansyah, H., Rafi, M. F., Utama, A. P., Aprilia, T., & Slamet, J. (2025). Assessing learning outcomes and self-directed learning through gamification in LMS. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101696
Grazzi, E. (2024). Bridging the gap between EFL and ELF through sociocultural theory. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 46, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.46.09
Harris, J. (2025). Measuring listening and speaking self-efficacy in EFL contexts: The development of the communicative SE questionnaire. Language Teaching Research, 29(3), 1210–1234. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221091608
Ikhwan, S., Sugiarti, S., Hidayati, D., Slamet, J., & Hidayat, Y. (2025). A gamification-based reading comprehension course in learning management system: Enhancing learning outcomes, critical thinking, and self-directed learning skills for Islamic undergraduate students. Applied Research on English Language, 14(4), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2025.146587.2609
Irianti, L., Faridi, A., Pratama, H., & Suwandi. (2024). Flipped classroom and critical thinking on public speaking class. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2315815
Khodabandeh, F. (2022). Investigating the effectiveness of augmented reality-enhanced instruction on EFL learners’ speaking in online flipped and face-to-face classes. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221110991
Köroğlu, Z. Ç. (2021). Using digital formative assessment to evaluate EFL learners’ English speaking skills. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 22, 103–123. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1001
Lee, J. S. (2022). The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(5), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1746319
MacIntyre, P. (2020). Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.6
MacIntyre, P. D., & Wang, L. (2021). Willingness to communicate in the L2 about meaningful photos: Application of the pyramid model of WTC. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 878–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211004645
Mahmood, R. Q. (2023). Enhancing EFL speaking and pronunciation skills: Using explicit formal instruction in a Kurdish university. Issues in Educational Research, 33(4), 1421–1440. http://www.iier.org.au/iier33/mahmood.pdf
Mulyadi, D., Wijayatiningsih, T. D., Swaran Singh, C. K., & Prastikawati, E. F. (2021). Effects of technology enhanced task-based language teaching on learners’ listening comprehension and speaking performance. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14342a
Narke, P. (2021). Communicative strategies as a tool for assessing spoken interactional competence. In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment (pp. 249–274). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5_13
Nasriandi, N., & Masruddin, M. (2021). The Use of British Parliamentary Debate Style in Teaching Speaking Skill. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 9(1).
Nussbaum, E. M. (2021). Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1845173
Özmen, E. (2025). Educational application and games for specific skills development. In Enhancing School Counseling with Technology and Case Studies (pp. 73–104). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8392-6.ch004
Park, K., Sohn, H., Mott, B., Min, W., Saleh, A., Glazewski, K., Hmelo-Silver, C., & Lester, J. (2021). Detecting disruptive talk in student chat-based discussion within collaborative game-based learning environments. LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448178
Pituxcoosuvarn, M., Radhapuram, S. C. T., & Murakami, Y. (2024). Taboo talks: Enhancing ESL speaking skills through language model integration in interactive games. Procedia Computer Science, 246, 3674–3683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.189
Poehner, M. E. (2022). Motivation, mediation, and the individual: A sociocultural theory perspective. In Researching Language Learning Motivation. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350166912.ch-2
Ristanto, R. H., Kristiani, E., & Lisanti, E. (2022). Flipped classroom–digital game-based learning (FC-DGBL): Enhancing genetics conceptual understanding of students in bilingual programme. Journal of Turkish Science Education. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.124
Romsi, A., Widodo, J. P., & Slamet, J. (2024). Empowering slow learners: Gamification’s impact on students’ engagement and academic performance in an LMS for undergraduate students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.2.2040
Roohani, A., & Vincheh, M. H. (2023). Effect of game-based, social media, and classroom-based instruction on the learning of phrasal verbs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1929325
Sarani, A., & Kord, M. (2023). The effect of regulatory focus orientations on Iranian EFL learners’ speaking fluency and willingness to communicate. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 15(1), 191–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2023.46895.2388
Setiawan, E. I., Masruddin, M., & Zainuddin, Z. (2023). Semiotic Analysis and Ethnography Study on the Implementation of Local Wisdom in Economic Field at Luwu Society. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 11(2), 1912-1925.
Slamet, J., & Basthomi, Y. (2024). Assessing gamification-based LMS for EFL students: A self-directed learning framework. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 12(2), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.46687/CVHT3942.%20
Slamet, J., Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., & Eliyanah, E. (2024a). Unlocking the potential in a gamification-based MOOC: Assessing autonomous learning and self-directed learning behaviors. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 12, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.19
Slamet, J., Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., & Eliyanah, E. (2024b). Utilizing an SDL approach in designing a gamification-based MOOC to enhance autonomous learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, 010. https://doi.org/10.28945/5278
Slamet, J., Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., & Eliyanah, E. (2025a). A needs analysis for designing a gamification-based MOOC in English for specific purposes. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 13(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.46687/ULRS1031
Slamet, J., Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., & Eliyanah, E. (2025b). Promoting autonomous learning in ESP courses through a gamified MOOC platform: A self-directed learning framework. Journal of Educators Online, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2025.22.2.7
Tran, N., Hoang, D. T. N., Gillespie, R., Yen, T. T. H., & Phung, H. (2024). Enhancing EFL learners’ speaking and listening skills through authentic online conversations with video conferencing tools. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2334809
Widodo, J. P., Musyarofah, L., & Slamet, J. (2025). The impact of digital-interactive-book gamification-based instruction on academic learning outcomes of students who learn at their own pace: Insight from Indonesia. MEXTESOL Journal, 49(2), 1–11.
Widodo, P., Subandowo, M., Musyarofah, L., & Slamet, J. (2023). Interactive gamification-flip-book for developing students’ outcomes. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 754–762. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.002
Wong, C. H. T., & Yunus, M. M. (2023). Let “flippity” speak: Using online board game to improve speaking skills among elementary pupils. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-12-2023(volume-12-issue-2-april-2023), 1085–1096. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.1085
Yin, H., & Chen, Y. (2024). Game-based mechanisms for speaking English enhancement: Exploring the potential of electronic games in English teaching in Chinese universities. SHS Web of Conferences, 190, 01011. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419001011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rachmat Awaludin Yusuf, Yulianto Sabat, Laili Hibatin Wafiroh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
