Fostering Students’ Speech Texts: A Thematic Progression Analysis on Senior High School Students’ Speeches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.9974Keywords:
Coherence; Speech competition; SFL, Thematic progression; Theme-rhemeAbstract
This research explores the themes and thematic development in high school students’ speeches at a speech contest organized by one of Indonesia’s prominent English tutoring centers in 2024. The research method employed in this research was descriptive qualitative using Systematic Functional Linguistics. Data in this research were obtained by observing YouTube videos of the respective speech contest. The videos were transcribed in the form of written text. Four videos were selected randomly and coded as ST1, ST2, ST3, and ST4. The results indicated that the four speeches realized most types of themes, with topical themes occurring most frequently. This suggests that students tended to focus on the specified topics and maintain coherence between sentences. The zig-zag pattern was the most frequently used in thematic progress. This indicates that the speakers tended to elaborate on the topic in the text more clearly by utilizing various available information. This research provides teachers with insight into the importance of students’ knowledge of themes and thematic development in the construction of their speeches.
References
Al-reshaid, N., & Alhojailan, A. I. (2025). Stylistic Variations in Thematic Structure Across Academic Genres : A Case Study of EFL Graduate Students. 15.
Alqasham, F. H., Al-Ahdal, A. A. M., & Babekir, A. H. S. (2021). Coherence and Cohesion in Saudi EFL Learners’ Essay Writing: A Study at a Tertiary-level Institution. Asian EFL Journal, 28(1), 8–25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349256060_Coherence_and_Cohesion_in_Saudi_EFL_Learners’_Essay_Writing_A_Study_at_a_Tertiary-level_Institution
Aminova, B. D. (2022). Importance Of Coherence and Cohesion in Writing. Eurasian Research Bulletin, 4, 83–89.
Amoah, S., & Yeboah, J. (2021). The speaking difficulties of Chinese EFL learners and their motivation towards speaking the English language. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.4
Asep Saepuloh, Ningsih, D. N., & Halimah. (2023). Theme-Rheme And Thematic Progression Analysis Of Joe Biden’s Speech On Israel-Hamas And Russia-Ukraine Wars. International Journal of Educational and Life Sciences, 1(4), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v1i4.991
Brian Paltridge. (2022). Discourse An Analysis : An Introduction (K. Hyland (ed.); 3rd ed.).
Canestra, N., & Putra, A. (2023). STUDENTS ’ ANXIETY IN SPEAKING ENGLISH IN. 10(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v10i2.
Dashela, T. (2021). The Analysis of Theme and Rheme in Short Story of Sleeping Beauty with a Systemic Functional Approach. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 2(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v2i01.201
Daymiel, R. J., Cantina, J. M., Alipoyo, V. R. I., Comecilla, M. O., Patay, A. S., & Recamara, J. T. (2022). Anxiety in Second Language in Relation to Students’ Speaking Performance. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 01(August), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v1i08.41
Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. Continuum International Publishing Group. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.0327j.x
Emilia, E., & Hamied, F. A. (2015). SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTIC GENRE PEDAGOGY ( SFL GP ) IN A TERTIARY EFL WRITING CONTEXT IN INDONESIA. TEFLIN Journal, 26(2), 155–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/155-182
Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. An introductory workbook. Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hameed, Y. S., & Challob, A. I. (2022). Synonymy as a Cohesive Device in Students’ English Essay Writing. Al-Adab Journal, 140, 91–110. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i140.3632
Happy gusnar, N. S., Hartono, R., & Suwandi, S. (2021). Cohesion and Coherence in Final Project Abstracts Written by Non-English Department Undergraduate Students. English Education Journal, 11(4), 516–527. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v11i1.47453
Hendrawan, W., Sujatna, E. T. S., Krisnawati, E., & Darmayanti, N. (2021). Thematic Progression in Uncovering Paragraph Coherence: Some Evidences in Indonesian Secretarial Academy Context. TESOL International Journal, 16(1), 179–209.
Himphinit, M., & Astia, I. (2023). Systemic Functional Linguistics : Analyzing the Theme System and Thematic Progression in Indonesian University Students ’ English (Vol. 1). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-022-0
Islami, K. H., Saleh, M., & Linggar Bharati, D. A. (2022). The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Text by English Training Participants at PST”. English Education Journal, 12(1), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.49052
Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., Lu, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). The Effect of the Online and Offline Blended Teaching Mode on English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Listening Performance in a Chinese Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742742
Knapp, B. (2024). Skill in Sport: The Attainment of Proficiency. Skill in Sport: The Attainment of Proficiency, 1–204. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003484110/SKILL-SPORT-KNAPP/RIGHTS-AND-PERMISSIONS
Larasati, K. D., I Gusti Ayu Vina Widiadnya Putri, & Putu Nur Ayomi. (2022). Analysis on Thematic Progression Patterns of Boris Johnson’s Speech. ELYSIAN JOURNAL : English Literature, Linguistics and Translation Studies, 2(4), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.36733/elysian.v2i4.4400
Meng, J. (2022). A Comparative Study on the Master Position Advancement Mode of English Abstracts for Linguistics Dissertations. Journal of Hefei College (General Edition), 39(03), 60–65.
Ngongo, M., & Ndandara, A. (2024). Exploring the Realization of Cohesion As a Resource of Text Texture on Undergraduate Students’ Academic Writing. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(1), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i1.9241
Purwati, D., Faruq Ubaidillah, M., & Restall, G. C. (2023). “Sorry, I Can’t Speak”: English Teachers’ Challenges of Teaching EFL Speaking in an Indonesian Vocational High School Sector. Mextesol Journal, 47(1), 0–2. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v47n1-1
Putra, P. P., Fatmawati, U., Bengkulu, S., & Astari, Y. (2022). Analysis of Cohesion and Coherence in the Background of Thesis Written by English Education Study Program Students of IAIN Bengkulu in Period September 2020. Linguistics and Literature, 5(1), 79–90.
Rizki, M., Hidayat, D. N., Husna, N., & Alex. (2022). DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL COHESION DEVICES IN STUDENT EXPLANATION. Journal of English Education and Development, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v6i1.1545
Rodliyah, R. S., & Liani, A. E. (2022). SFL analysis: An investigation of students’ use of cohesive devices in exposition text. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46596
Rusdin, R., & Purwati, D. (2023). Speaking Up: A Comprehensive Investigation of EFL Secondary Students’ Speaking Skill Problems in Indonesia’s Islamic School Context. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 5(2), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v5i2.11911
Siregar, J., Nurlela, N., & Zein, T. T. (2023). An Analysis of Cohesive Devices in EFL Students’ Essay Writing. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.21462/IJEFL.V8I1.577
Sulastri, S. (2022). How A Student Develops Paragraphs : A Thematic Progression Analysis of Student Works on Short Story. Journal Of Education And Teaching Learning (JETL), 4(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.51178/jetl.v4i2.558
Trinh, N. B., & Pham, D. T. T. (2021). Challenges in speaking classrooms among non-English majors. Vietnam Journal of Education, 5(2), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2021.96
Turner, J. E., Li, B., & Wei, M. (2021). Exploring effects of culture on students’ achievement motives and goals, self-efficacy, and willingness for public performances: The case of Chinese students’ speaking English in class. Learning and Individual Differences, 85(December 2020), 101943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101943
Utama, A. R., Prabowo, R. K., Lusiana Indra Sari, & Kurniawan, A. (2026). A Textual Metafunction Analysis of Vocational High School Students ’ Speeches. 97–124.
Utama, A. R., Sri Wuli Fitriati, & Zulfa Sakhiyya. (2024). Unveiling Cohesion in Senior High School Students’ Speeches: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 5(2), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v5i2.1519
Wakerkwa, D. A. P. (2024). GRAMMATICAL COHESIVE FEATURES IN INDONESIAN EFL STUDENTS ’ ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS. ACCELERATION: Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 02(01), 56–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70210/amrj.v2i01.63
Wang, T. (2021). Discourse Analysis of Lord of the Flies : A Systemic Functional Approach. Advances in Literary Study, 9(3), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.4236/als.2021.93013
Wijayanti, H., Suwandi, S., & Fitriati, S. W. (2023). Assessing the Students’ Use of Cohesive Devices in Writing Hortatory Exposition Text. English Education Journal, 13(3), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v13i3.72805
Zahra, G. M., Emilia, E., & Nurlaelawati, I. (2021). An Analysis of Cohesion and Coherence of Descriptive Texts Written by Junior High School Students. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020), 546(Conaplin 2020), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.030
Zamroni, A., Wuli Fitriati, S., & Widhiyanto, W. (2023). The Realization of Thematic Progression in Background of Study Section Written by Undergraduate Students at Tidar University. English Education Journal, 13(2), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v13i2.71502
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rachma Choirunnisa, Seful Bahri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
