Teachers’ Talk: Expectations and Challenges in Using the Hablo App in EFL Clasroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.9999Keywords:
digital learning platforms, teacher perceptionsAbstract
The integration of digital technology in education has become a global phenomenon that is changing the paradigm of learning in the 21st century. In Indonesia, the adoption of mobile learning applications such as Hablo App shows an increasing trend in line with the national digital literacy agenda. Teachers, as the main implementers, face a dilemma between the transformative potential of technology and the reality of technical and pedagogical constraints in the field. This study used an exploratory qualitative case study design with a purposive sampling approach involving two teachers who had implemented the Hablo App. Data collection involved observation and interviews was administered to gather specific data about usage patterns, satisfaction levels, and technical difficulties. This study emphasizes the expectations and challenges of teachers regarding the use of the Hablo App in classroom. These findings hold significant implications for educational app developers, language educators, and policymakers aiming to optimize digital learning.
References
Alshammari, M. (2020). The role of educational technology in teaching English as a foreign language. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(5), 723-730.
Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2020). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education, 146, 103750.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159
Stockwell, G. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0768
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53-64.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, N., Eickelmann, B., & Zaka, P. (2013). Restructuring of educational systems in the digital age from a co-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 438-450.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. Y. (2011). A formative assessment strategy for enhancing the effectiveness of mobile learning. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 45-57.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in 21st century. Theory into Practice, 53(3), 225-232.
Kaliisa, R., & Picard, M. (2017). A systematic review on mobile learning in higher education: The African perspective. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 1-18.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2019). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. Routledge.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Nikolopoulou, K., Gialamas, V., & Lavidas, K. (2021). Acceptance of mobile phone by university students for their studies: An investigation applying UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1449-1471.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35.
Stockwell, G. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0768
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575.
Trucano, M. (2016). SABER-ICT framework paper for policy analysis: Documenting national educational technology policies around the world and their evolution. World Bank Group.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahma Laila Tambunan, Deasy Yunita Siregar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
