Judicial Independence and Dual Positions: A Siyasah Qadhaiyah Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 183/PUU-XXII/2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/jiis.v5i2.10375Keywords:
Independensi Advokat, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Siyasah QadhaiyahAbstract
This research is motivated by the limited number of studies analyzing Constitutional Court Decision No. 183/PUU-XXII/2024 concerning the prohibition of concurrent positions between leaders of advocate organizations and state officials from a siyasah qadhaiyah perspective. Previous studies generally focused on the constitutional aspects of the advocate profession without linking them to Islamic judicial principles. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach through an analysis of Constitutional Court decisions, related regulations, and legal literature. The results show that the Constitutional Court affirms independence, impartiality, and the prevention of conflicts of interest as the primary basis for limiting concurrent positions to maintain the integrity of the advocate profession. This decision strengthens the professionalism of advocate organizations, clarifies the boundaries of relations with state power, and supports an accountable judicial system. From a siyasah qadhaiyah perspective, the decision aligns with the principles of justice, trustworthiness, and sadd al-dzari'ah as preventive mechanisms to maintain the purity of the judicial function. These findings confirm that Constitutional Court decisions have constitutional and normative relevance in developing a judiciary with integrity.
References
Abu, Z. (2019). Ushul fiqh. Pustaka Firdaus.
Alter, K. J. (2008). Agents or trustees? International courts in their political context. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087765
Asman. (2020). Sadd al-dzari’ah dalam perspektif hukum Islam. Al-Qadau: Jurnal Peradilan dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v7i2.14720
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Bachdim, F. (2023). Implikasi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap masa jabatan pimpinan organisasi advokat. UNES Law Review, 5(3), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.398
Busyro. (2019). Maqashid al-syari’ah: Pengetahuan mendasar memahami maslahah. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 17(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v17i2.1475
Diva, Y. (2025). Dampak Putusan MK, Wamen Otto Hasibuan Harus Mundur dari Ketua Peradi. IDN times. https://www.idntimes.com/news/indonesia/dampak-putusan-mk-wamen-otto-hasibuan-harus-mundur-dari-ketua-peradi-00-jkxzp-x0t0qt
Dressel, B., & Inoue, T. (2018). Judicial independence and accountability in contemporary Asia. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1324–1354. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12341
Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial review in new democracies: Constitutional courts in Asian cases. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511185
Handoko, B., Tisnanta, H. S., & Amrullah, R. (2025). Urgensi reformasi sistem pengawasan advokat untuk mewujudkan akuntabilitas profesi. Jurnal Hukum, 12(2), 6610–6619.
Hirschl, R. (2004). The political origins of judicial empowerment. Comparative Politics, 36(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150133
Hukum Online. (2025a). MK larang Rangkap Jabatan Pimpinan Organisasi Advokat Dengan Pejabat Negara. hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mk-larang-rangkap-jabatan-pimpinan-organisasi-advokat-dan-pejabat-negara-lt688a0a6684a91/
Hukum Online. (2025b). Pemerintah Tegaskan Tak ada larangan Pejabat Negara Pimpin Organisasi Advokat. hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pemerintah-tegaskan-tak-ada-larangan-pejabat-negara-pimpin-organisasi-advokat-lt683ecfdcbc5ca/?page=all
Ibnu Taimiyah. (2019). As-Siyasah Asy-Syar’iyyah. Dar Al-Kutub Al-`ilmiyyah.
Ija, S. (2025). Mahkamah Konstitusi Perlu Diberi Kepastian Peran. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/07/02/09562321/mahkamah-konstitusi-perlu-diberi-kepastian-peran
Japansen, S. (2024). Profesionalitas dan integritas advokat dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 141–151.
Jasser, A. (2019). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. IIIT.
Jimly, A. (2020). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Kartika, M. (2025). Kerugian Konstitusional Akibat Ketiadaan Larangan Pimpinan Organisasi Advokat Rangkap Jabatan. Mahkamah Konstitusi. https://www.mkri.id/berita/kerugian-konstitusional-akibat-ketiadaan-larangan-pimpinan-organisasi-advokat-rangkap-jabatan-23053
Kementrian Agama RI. (2013). Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya. CV Diponogoro.
Kosař, D. (2016). Perils of judicial self-government in transitional societies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316480638
Lubis, F., et al. (2025). Fungsi dan peran advokat dalam sistem penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(2), 36662–36669.
Malleson, K. (2006). Judicial independence and accountability: The role of constitutional norms. Modern Law Review, 69(4), 594–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00621.x
McCrudden, C. (2008). Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 655–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043
Peters, A. (2013). The rule of law dimensions of judicial independence. European Constitutional Law Review, 9(3), 403–431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019612001232
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.183/PUU-XXII/2024 (2024).
Putusan Nomor 183/PUU-XXII/2024, 110 (2024).
Ramadhan, R. A. (2024). Standar Etika Dan Tantangan Profesi Hukum Advokat Di Era Digital. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 5(6), 7654-7666.
Samuel Saut Martua, S. (2017). Organisasi Advokat dan Urgensi Peran Pemerintah dalam Profesi Advokat. jurnal konstitusi, 14(3), 511–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1433
Sandi Yoga, P. (2025). Kontestasi yudisial dan independensi profesi dalam pembekuan sumpah advokat. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 1(1), 65–80.
Shapiro, M. (1981). Courts: A comparative and political analysis. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226161347.001.0001
Solehuddin. (2011). Qua Vadis Independensi Advokat dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. jurnal perspektif, 16(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v16i2.73
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004). On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812374
Wabbah Azzuhaili. (n.d.). Ushul Fiqh al-Islami. Dar al-Fikr.
Yusdianto. (2020). Konflik kepentingan dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 9(1), 1–15.
Zakaria, M. (2018). Peradilan dalam Politik Islam (Al Qadhaiyyah fi Siyasah Assyar’iyyah). Hukumah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 1(1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Rafi Sulistio, Muhammad Amin, Lutfi Fahrul Rizal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies agree to the following terms:
- Authors have retained full articles copyright and grant the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see also deposit policy and archiving on page journal).
