Kronotop dan Sinkretisme: Kajian Dialogis Budaya dan Agama pada Upacara Rambu Solo Masyarakat Tana Toraja.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/pal.v10i1.6720Abstract
This article aims to analyze the phenomenon of syncretism in the Rambu Solo ceremony in Tana Toraja, focusing on the chronotope of communication in the syncretism process bound by the dimensions of space and time. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a communication ethnography design, which involves data collection through participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions (FGD). The data obtained were analyzed using thematic and narrative analysis techniques to identify the main themes that emerged in the social and cultural interactions of the Toraja people. This approach allowsresearchers to explore in depth the meaning and process of symbol negotiation in the Rambu Solo ritual. The results of this study, Chronotope plays an important role as a concept that binds space and time in the Rambu Solo ceremony, a death ritual that becomes a dialogical arena combining various aspects of social and religious life. This shows a real manifestation of kinship ties that arebound in space and time with ancestors that are passed down from generation to generation, as well as religious ties to divine power, both of which encourage cultural and religious syncretism. The syncretism that occurs is dynamic and dialogical, not a meaningless unification, but rather a process of interaction that maintains cultural identity rooted in the local religion of aluk todolo in dialectic with religious teachings as the official discourse of the state. This study emphasizes the importance of a dialogical and interdisciplinary approach in understanding complex cultural phenomena, especially those involving the dimensions of space, time, and religiosity in the contextof indigenous communities.
Keywords: Chronotope, Syncretism, Dialogue, Rambu Solo
References
Baturante, Nurdin. Toraja Tongkonan Dan Kerukunan. Jogyakarta: Pustaka Al- Zikra, 2019. 107-179
Croucher, Stephen M., and Daniel Cronn-Mills. Understanding Communication Research Methods: A Theoretical and Practical Approach, Fourth Edition. Understanding Communication Research Methods: A Theoretical and Practical Approach, Fourth Edition, 2024. 133-154 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003432173.
Eyitayo Adewale Adelakun, Adegbola Thomas, and and Abiodun Omolara Adelakun. “Intercultural Competence As A Veritable Tool For Promoting Intercultural Dialogue In Contemporary Nigeria.” African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research 8 (2025): 32–40.
Fajar, Handika, Adrianus Nero, and F.X Armada Riyanto. “Pengaruh Dialog Interreligius Dalam Mencegah Konflik Sosial Antar Umat Beragama Di Karang Besuki Malang.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 6, no. 1 (2023): 51–59. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v6i1.46927.
Garrido, Norman. “The Method Of James Spradley In Qualitative Research.” Enfermería: Cuidados Humanizados, 2017. https://doi.org/10.22235/ech.v6iespecial.1450.
Gurevitch, Zali. “Dialectical Dialogue: The Struggle for Speech, Repressive Silence, and the Shift to Multiplicity.” British Journal of Sociology, (2001), 87-104 . https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020023046.
———. “Plurality in Dialogue: A Comment on Bakhtin.” Sociology, 2000. Cambridge University Press, Sociology, (May 2002) 243-263
Klyashev, Alexander, and Ranus Sadikov. “Syncretism and Identity: The Integration of Lutheranism among the Mari People of Bashkortostan, Russia.” Journal of Contemporary Rituals and Traditions 2, no. 2 (2024): 109–38. https://doi.org/10.15575/jcrt.373.
Lawson, James. “Chronotope, Story, and Historical Geography: Mikhail Bakhtin and the Space-Time of Narratives.” Antipode, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00853.x.
Michael Holquist. Dialogism. Second Edition. London and New York: Routledge, 2002. 1-242
Norman K. Denzin, Yvonna S. Lincoln. Handbook Of Qualitative Research. California, USA: Sage Publications, Inc, 2009.
Sandarupa, Stanislaus. “Kebudayaan Toraja Modal Bangsa, Milik Dunia.” Sosiohumaniora 16, no. 1 (2014), 1-9
Vermeersch, S. “Syncretism, Harmonization, and Mutual Appropriation between Buddhism and Confucianism in Pre-Joseon Korea.” Religions, (2020), 2-14 https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11050231.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurhakki, Tuti Bahfiarty, Syamsuddin Azis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.