Is It According to Plan? Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Vocational High School English Programme

Authors

  • Dewi Satria Elmiana University of Mataram, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Shiyi Shen Warner School of Education University of Rochester, USA., United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v4i1.2431

Abstract

Some critics have argued that the quality of the teaching and learning process tends to be inappropriate; that it does not relate to industry needs, current technology, or innovation, and generates inadequate basic skills among students, particularly in learning English (Himpun, 2015; OECD, 2015; Serdyukov,2017). Grounded in the CIPP evaluation model proposed by Daniel L. Stufflebeam, this study evaluates the effectiveness of an aspect of the English study programme that has rarely been examined. The results suggest that the goal achievement of goals in the English programme is significantly affected by teachers’ and students’ activities; by teaching and learning materials; and by the school environment. However, school facilities – one of the pivotal elements - have not significant effect on English programme, even when they are not used properly to support the teaching and learning process. Thus, the implications of this study would be of interest not only to educational practitioners, but also to education policy makers in implementing English- medium education in vocational school.

Keywords:CIPP model; English programme; evaluation study; teaching and learning; vocational high school

Author Biographies

Dewi Satria Elmiana, University of Mataram, Indonesia

Dewi Satria Elmiana has a Doctorate Degree in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) at Queen’s University Belfast – United Kingdom. Her research interests are in the areas of English materials development, critical pedagogy, multicultural education, and visual literacy.

 

Shiyi Shen, Warner School of Education University of Rochester, USA.

Shiyi Shen is currently a Ph.D candidiate in department of teaching and curriculum, Warner School of Education, University of Rochester, USA.

References

Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Bland, J.M. (1997). Statistics note: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ, 314-572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Naional Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun2007, tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Nasional untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Depdiknas. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Naional Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2008, tentang Standar Sarana dan Prasarana Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan/Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan (SMK/MAK).

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed). London: Pearson Education, Inc.

Himpun, P. (2015). Problematic approach to English learning and teaching: A case in Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 8(3), 35–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n3p35

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1989). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press: Great Britain.

Irambona, A., & Kumaidi. (2015). The effectiveness of English teaching program in senior high school: A case study. Research and evaluation in education, 1(2), 114-128. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/6666/6592

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks. Sage Publications.

Lauder, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of key factors. Makara Social Humaniora, 12(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v12i1.128

Leung, C., & Teadale, A. (1998). ESL teacher competence: professionalism in a social market. Prospect, 13(1), 4-23. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.89591

Liu, J. (1999). Nonnative-English-Speaking Professionals in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588192

OECD (2015). Innovating to Learn, Learning to Innovate. OECD: Paris, France.

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it?. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007

Simatupang, M. (1999). Bahasa Inggris: Variasi yang mana? suatu tinjauan ulang tentang status Bahasa Inggris di Indonesia. In B.K. Purwo (Ed). PELLBA 12 (Pertemuan Lembaga Bahasa Atma Jaya: Kedua Belas), 63-84. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian dan Budaya Unika Atmajaya.

Stronge, J. H. (2007). Qualities of effective teachers (2nd ed). Alexandria: ASCD Publishers.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Wati, H. (2011). The effectiveness of Indonesian English teachers training programs in improving confidence and motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 4(1),79-104. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/59780

Yurekli, A. (2012). An analysis of curriculum renewal in EAP context. International journal of instruction, 5 (1), 50-68. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/59751

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-03-28

Citation Check