The Role of Generative AI in Enhancing Second Language Writing Fluency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v6i2.9552Keywords:
Academic integrity; Feedback literacy; Generative AI; Learner autonomy; Writing fluencyAbstract
This mixed-methods quasi-experimental study evaluated the efficacy of generative AI-assisted feedback in improving EFL students' academic writing in comparison to traditional instructor feedback. Thirty-two sixth-semester students enrolled in an academic writing course were allocated to either an AI-assisted experimental group (n = 16) or a teacher-feedback control group (n = 16). Students submitted pre- and post-test argumentative essays assessed for fluency (total word count; average sentence length), correctness (errors per 100 words), and coherence (discourse markers; cohesion index). A questionnaire and semi-structured interviews elicited perceptions and ethical apprehensions. The AI group had superior advancements in fluency and coherence, although accuracy enhanced in both groups. Students appreciated immediacy and specificity, while acknowledged the dangers of excessive dependence and ambiguity in writing. Research indicates that AI can enhance instructor feedback by providing additional revision chances and fostering autonomy within integrity-centered advice in EFL academic writing.
References
Adel, A., Ahsan, A., & Davison, C. (2024). ChatGPT promises and challenges in education: Computational and ethical perspectives. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080814
Aljasser, A. (2025). Investigating EFL students' perceptions of feedback: a comparative study of instructor and ChatGPT-generated responses in academic writing. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13649-8
Asad, M. M., Shahzad, S., Shah, S. H. A., Sherwani, F., & Almusharraf, N. M. (2024). ChatGPT as artificial intelligence-based generative multimedia for English writing pedagogy: challenges and opportunities from an educator’s perspective. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(5), 490-506. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2024-0021
Bandi, A., Adapa, P. V. S. R., & Kuchi, Y. E. V. P. K. (2023). The power of generative ai: A review of requirements, models, input–output formats, evaluation metrics, and challenges. Future Internet. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15080260
Bray, A., Girvan, C., & Chorcora, E. N. (2023). Students' perceptions of pedagogy for 21st century learning instrument (S-POP-21): Concept, validation, and initial results. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101319
Chang, C. H., & Kidman, G. (2023). The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) language models-challenges and opportunities for geographical and environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 32(2), 85-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2023.2194036
Chen, S. Y., Chen, W. C., & Lai, C. F. (2025). Generative AI as a reflective scaffold in a UAV-based STEM project: A mixed-methods study on students' higher-order thinking and cognitive transformation. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13758-4
Cotos, E. (2023). Automated feedback on writing. In Digital writing technologies in higher education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 347-364). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36033-6_22
Ge, Z. G. (2026). The mechanisms of AI feedback's influence on college students' learning engagement in human-AI collaborative learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2026.2620543
Hirschi, K., Kang, O., Yang, M., Hansen, J. H., & Beloin, K. (2025). Artificial Intelligence‐Generated Feedback for Second Language Intelligibility: An Exploratory Intervention Study on Effects and Perceptions. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12719
Huawei, S. & Aryadoust, V. (2023). A systematic review of automated writing evaluation systems. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11200-7
Hwang, H., Chang, X., & Sun, J. (2025). Generative AI is useful for second language writing, but when, why, and for how long do learners use it?. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101230
Jamshed, M., Albedah, F., Ansari, M. S., & Banu, S. (2025). Assessing the Efficacy of AI-Driven Corrective Feedback via WhatsApp Application to Improve ESL Learners' Writing Skills: An Experimental Study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v19i07.52709
Jiang, Z., Xu, Z., Pan, Z., He, J., & Xie, K. (2023). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in facilitating assessment of writing performance in second language learning. Languages. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040247
Karagoz, I. (2025). AI-generated feedback in English writing instruction for EFL/ESL learners: A systematic review (2024–2025). The Reading Matrix.
Kurt, G., & Kurt, Y. (2024). Enhancing L2 writing skills: ChatGPT as an automated feedback tool. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23.
Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174
Li, B., Lowell, V. L., Wang, C., & Li, X. (2024). A systematic review of the first year of publications on ChatGPT and language education: Examining research on ChatGPT’s use in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100266.
Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 605-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323
Lu, Q., Zhu, X., Zhu, S., & Yao, Y. (2024). Effects of writing feedback literacies on feedback engagement and writing performance: A cross-linguistic perspective. Assessing Writing, 62, 100889.
Lu, Q., Zhu, X., Zhu, S., & Yao, Y. (2024). Effects of writing feedback literacies on feedback engagement and writing performance: A cross-linguistic perspective. Assessing Writing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100889
Mao, Z., Lee, I., & Li, S. (2024). Written corrective feedback in second language writing: A synthesis of naturalistic classroom studies. Language Teaching.
Mekheimer, M. (2025). Generative AI-assisted feedback and EFL writing: a study on proficiency, revision frequency and writing quality. Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00602-7
Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Schiller, R., Liebenow, L. W., Steinbach, M., Horbach, A., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024). Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students’ text revision, motivation, and positive emotions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100199.
Peckham, O., Raines, J., Bulsink, E., Goudswaard, M., Gopsill, J., Barton, D., ... & Hicks, B. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Generative Design: A Structured Review of Trends and Opportunities in Techniques and Applications. Designs, 9(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs9040079
Qu, K. & Wu, X. (2024). ChatGPT as a CALL tool in language education: A study of hedonic motivation adoption models in English learning environments. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12598-y
Rahimi, M., Fathi, J., & Zou, D. (2025). Exploring the impact of automated written corrective feedback on the academic writing skills of EFL learners: An activity theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12896-5
Tam, A. C. F. (2025). Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2374485
Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners' perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270
Wang, C. & Tian, Z. (2025). Rethinking Writing Education in the Age of Generative AI. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003426936
Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Suwanwihok, K., Jinowat, N., & Muenjanchoey, R. (2024). Synergizing collaborative writing and AI feedback: An investigation into enhancing L2 writing proficiency in wiki-based environments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100228
Yeung, S. (2025). University students' engagement with generative AI-supported automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101203
Yeung, S. (2025). University students’ engagement with generative AI-supported automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 68, 101203.
Yin, J., Hao, X., Xing, G., & Xu, M. (2025). The effects of ChatGPT-driven blended teaching model on nursing rounds: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104545
Zadorozhnyy, A. & Lai, W. Y. W. (2023). ChatGPT and L2 written communication: A game-changer or just another tool?. Languages. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9010005
Zhan, Y. & Yan, Z. (2025). Students' engagement with ChatGPT feedback: Implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2471821
Zhang, K., Li, S., & Huang, Y. (2026). Generative AI-driven feedback in higher education: a scoping review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2617157
Zhang, Y. & Dong, C. (2024). Exploring the digital transformation of generative ai-assisted foreign language education: A socio-technical systems perspective based on mixed-methods. Systems. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110462
Zhuang, Y., Zhao, R., Xie, Z., & Yu, P. L. (2025). Enhancing language learning through generative AI feedback on picture-cued writing tasks. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100450
Zou, B., Wang, C., He, H., Li, C., Purwanto, E., & Wang, P. (2025). Enhancing EFL writing with visualised GenAI feedback: A cognitive affective theory of learning perspective on revision quality, emotional response, and human-computer interaction. Learning and Motivation, 91, 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102158
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rusdiana Junai, Affan Ramadhana, Nur Qalbi Rustan, Suci Putri Damayanti, Muh. Hardiansyah Pateha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)

