Moralitas Diskursus Dan Otoritas Wacana Keagamaan Di Media Sosial

Authors

  • Abdulloh Hanif Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Fithrah Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Saifur Rahman Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo
  • Masmuddin Masmuddin Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia
  • Windiyani Windiyani Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia
  • Alifah Alifah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/pal.v8i1.3773

Keywords:

Khaled Aboue el Fadl, Morality of Discourse, Social Media

Abstract

The progress of the digital world influences the structure of religious discourse. The development of religious discourse in digital space, especially social media, has run wild without control. One-sided truth claims are getting stronger. So Khaled Abou el-Fadl's offer deserves consideration, namely the morality of discourse as the authority for religious discourse on social media. This research focuses on how the morality of discourse can be used as a basis for the power of religious discourse on social media. This research is descriptive-qualitative, which is a conceptual study using library data. Through a holistic approach, the reference data is analyzed through data reduction and data presentation. The data presented are adapted to relevant perspectives, interpreted based on theories, classified into concepts, and narrated in a new understanding of the phenomenon under study. As a result, discourse morality procedures in the authority structure of religious discourse on social media need to be upheld so that belief in God as the highest authority is not replaced by unilateral claims. In addition, the morality of discourse can also be the basis for government policies to regulate and limit religious discourse discussed on social media.

Author Biography

Masmuddin Masmuddin, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo

â 

References

Abou El Fadl, Khaled. Atas Nama Tuhan. Penerbit Serambi, 2004.

______, Islam Dan Tantangan Demokrasi, 2004.

______, The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists. New York, 2005.

______, Melawan Tentara Tuhan, Yang Berwenang Dan Yang Sewenang-Wenang Dalam Islam. Translated by Kurniawan Abdullah. Jakarta: Serambi, 2003.

Alfajri, Ahmad, dan Abdul Haris Pito. “Regresi Moderasi Dan Narasi Keagamaan Di Sosial Media.†Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan 9, no. 2 (2021): 136–53.

Fakhruroji, Moch, Ridwan Rustandi, and Busro Busro. “Bahasa Agama Di Media Sosial: Analisis Framing Pada Media Sosial Islam Populer.†Jurnal Bimas Islam 13, no. 2 (2020): 203–34.

Habermas, Jurgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press, 1991.

Halimatusa’diyah, Iim. “Beragama Di Dunia Maya: Media Sosial Dan Pandangan Keagamaan Di Indonesia.†PPIM UIN Jakarta & MERIT Indonesia, 2020.

Hardiman, F. Budi, Demokrasi Deliberatif: Menimbang Negara Hukum Dan Ruang Publik Dalam Teori Diskursus Habermas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2009.

_______, Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1993

Heryanto, Ariel. Identitas Dan Kenikmatan. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 2015.

Katadata Insight Center. “Status Literasi Digital Indonesia 2020: Hasil Survei Di 34 Provinsi.â€

Kementerian Komunikasi Dan Informatika, 2020.

Mustofa, Saiful. “Berebut Wacana: Hilangnya Etika Komunikasi Di Ruang Publik Dunia Maya.†Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Masyarakat 15, no. 1 (2019): 58–

Nichols, Tom, Matinya Kepakaran: Perlawanan Terhadap Pengetahuan Yang Telah Mapan Dan Mudaratnya. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2018.

Noor, Irfan. “Identitas Agama, Ruang Publik Dan Post-Sekularisme: Perspektif Diskursus Jurgen Habermas.†Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin 11, no. 1 (2016): 61–87.

Wekke, Ismail Suardi, Metode Penelitian Sosial, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Gawe Buku, 2019.

Yusuf, A. Muri. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Prenada Media, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-18

Citation Check