The Usage of Cohesive Devices by High-Achieving EFL Students in Writing Argumentative Essays

Andri Saputra(1*), M. Arif Rahman Hakim(2)
(1) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu
(2) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.24256/itj.v2i1.1227


This study aims to investigate types of cohesive devices frequently used in writing argumentative essays by high-achieving college students in Indonesia and to analyse their awareness of usage of these. Participants were asked to write an essay on a pre-determined topic; analysis was then conducted to investigate the most frequent cohesive devices used. Data on the second study question, understanding of the usage of cohesive devices, were gathered though semi-structured interviews. The data indicate that students effectively used various types of grammatical cohesive devices, particularly reference devices. However, some claimed not to know that they were using other cohesive devices. They believed that conjunctions were the only type that functions to connect ideas across sentences and paragraphs, and did not realise that this, that, the, and other reference devices are cohesive devices. In terms of the use of lexical cohesive devices, participants used synonyms more than other sub-types of lexical cohesive devices. The most frequently used device was the, which functions both as a cohesive device and an article. All participants agreed that though links or cohesive devices are necessary to achieve coherence, two claimed that these are not determining factors in producing good writing quality. They argued that high-quality writing needs to contain linguistic features related to sophisticated language and text difficulty. The first suggestion is that focused programs should be adopted to teach the writing of argumentative essays to help lower-achieving students attain the same writing level as high-achieving students. Second, a teaching programme integrating the use of sophisticated grammar, lexical diversity and cohesive devices should be a curriculum priority. 



Alarcon, J., (2013). Lexical cohesion in students argumentative essay among a select group of Filipino college students. i-Manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), p.43.

Alarcon, J.B. & Morales, K.N.S., (2011). Grammatical cohesion in students argumentative essay. International Journal of English and Literature, 2(5), pp.114-127.

Ariyati, L.M., (2008). The influence of English on Indonesian Lexis in IT (Information Technology) (Doctoral dissertation, Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya).

Axelrod, R.B. & Cooper, Ch. R., (1988). The St. Martin’s guide to writing. New York: St. Martin‟s Press.

Azzouz, B., (2009). A discourse analysis of grammatical cohesion in student's writing.

Berg, E.C., (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of second language writing, 8(3), pp.215-241.

Carson, J.G. & Nelson, G.L., (1996). Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of second language writing, 5(1), pp.1-19.

Castro, C.D., (2004). Cohesion and the social construction of meaning in the essays of Filipino college students writing in L2 English. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(2), pp.215-225.

Caruso, J. M. (1994). The effects of extensive reading on reading comprehension and writing proficiency in foreign language learning. Unpublished dissertation. UMI AAT 9543412.

Celce-Murcia, M. & Olshtain, E., (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teachers. Ernst KlettSprachen.

Connor, U., (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 17(3), pp.301-316.

Dastjerdi, H.V. & Samian, S.H., (2011). Quality of Iranian EFL learners’ argumentative essays: Cohesive devices in focus. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), pp.65-76.

Enkvist, N.E., (1990). Seven problems in the study of coherence and interpretability. Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives, pp.9-28.

Fulkerson, R., (1996). Teaching the Argument in Writing. National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096.

Ghasemi, M., (2013).An investigation into the use of cohesive devices in second language writings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), p.1615.

Green, C.F., Christopher, E.R. & Mei, J.L.K., (2000). The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: A corpus-based enquiry. English for Specific Purposes, 19(2), pp.99-113.

Gu, Q. & Maley, A., (2008). Changing places: A study of Chinese students in the UK. Language and Intercultural Communication, 8(4), pp.224-245.

Halliday, M.A., (1994). Functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A., (2004). Revised by Matthiessen. CMIM An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Arnold: London.

Halliday, M.A. and Hasan, R., (1976). Cohesion in. English, Longman, London.

Hasan, R., (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language and the structure of prose, 181219.

Heaton, J.B., Harmer, J., Kingsbury, R. and Parkins, D., (1988). Writing English language tests (Vol. 1, pp. 1-13). New York: Longman.

Hedgcock, J. & Lefkowitz, N., (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of second language writing, 1(3), pp.255-276.

Hinkel, E., (2001). Matters of cohesion in L2 academic texts. Applied Language Learning, 12(2), pp.111-132.

Hoey, M., (1991).Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jafarpur, A., (1991). Cohesiveness as a basis for evaluating compositions. System, 19(4), pp.459-465.

Johnson, P., (1992). Cohesion and coherence in compositions in Malay and English. RELC journal, 23(2), pp.1-17.

Kennedy, M.L., (1985). The composing process of college students writing from sources. Written Communication, 2(4), pp.434-456.

Krashen, S.D., (1996). The case for narrow listening. System, 24(1), pp.97-100.

Lai, E. F. K., (1993). Effect of extensive reading on English learning in Hong Kong. CUHK Education Journal, 21(1), 23-36.

Leki, I., (1990). Coaching from the margins: issues in written response. In Kroll, B., editor, Second language writing: research insights for the classroom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–68.

Liu, M. & Braine, G., (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33(4), pp.623-636.

Lopez-Fernandez, O. & Molina-Azorin, J.F., (2011). The use of mixed methods research in interdisciplinary educational journals. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(2), pp.269-283.

McCulley, G.A., (1985). Writing quality, coherence, and cohesion. Research in the Teaching of English, pp.269-282.

McNamara, D.S., Crossley, S.A. & McCarthy, P.M., (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27(1), pp.57-86.

Meisuo, Z., (2000). Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities. RELC journal, 31(1), pp.61-95.

Munsell, P & Clough, M., (1984). A practical guide for advanced writers in English as a second language. Macmillan publishing company, New York.

Nordquist, R., (2016). Cohesion Strategies: Repeating Key Words and Structures. [online] Available at: [Accessed 19 August 2017].

National Education Association of the United States. Research Division, (2003). Status of the American Public-school Teacher. National Education Association of the United States, Research Division.

Omaggio, A. C., (1986). Teaching Language in Context. Heinle&Heinle, Boston.

Parsons, G., (1991). Cohesion coherence: Scientific texts. Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses, 55, p.415.

Paulus, T.M., (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of second language writing, 8(3), pp.265-289.

Patriana, A.W., Rachmajanti, S. and Mukminatien, N., (2016). STUDENTS’ABILITY IN USING DISCOURSE MARKERS TO BUILD COHERENCE IN COMPOSITIONS. TEFLIN Journal, 27(2), pp.203-216.

Plakans, L., (2009). The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), pp.252-266.

Podis, J.M & Podis, L.A., (1996). Rethinking writing. Boston, Allyn and Bacon.

Raimes, A., (2002). Keys for Writers: A Brief Handbook 3rd. Haughton Mifflin, Boston.

Reid, J., (1992). A computer text analysis of four cohesion devices in English discourse by native and nonnative writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2), pp.79-107.

Reynolds, D.W., (1995). Repetition in nonnative speaker writing: More than quantity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(2), pp.185-209.

Reynolds, C.R., Livingston, R.B., Willson, V.L. & Willson, V., (2010). Measurement and assessment in education. Pearson Education International.

Rohim, A., (2010). Cohesion analysis on The Jakarta Post's editorial.

Seeley, J., (1998). The Oxford guide to writing and speaking. Oxford University press, Oxford.

Song, M. & Xia, W., (2002). Combination of textual cohesive ties and textual teaching for the teaching of English writing—a statistical analysis of the good and poor compositions written by non-English major freshmen. Foreign Language World, 6, 40–44.

Spivey, N.N. & King, J.R., (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, pp.7-26.

Stanley, J. (1992): Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing 1: 217–33.

Swales, J., (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. eds., (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage.

Tate, G., Corbett, E., & Myers, N., (1994). The writing teacher’s sourcebook. Oxford University Press, New York.

Todd, R.W., Khongput, S. & Darasawang, P., (2007).Coherence, cohesion and comments on students’ academic essays. Assessing Writing, 12(1), pp.10-25.

Tsui, A.B. & Ng, M., (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?. Journal of second language writing, 9(2), pp.147-170.

Villamil, O.S. & De Guerrero, M.C., (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), pp.51-75.

Wahiba, K., (2017). The Use of Cohesive Devices in Paragraph Writing Case study: Second Year LMD students at Biskra University (Doctoral dissertation).

Watanabe, Y., (2001). Read-to-write tasks for the assessment of second language academic writing skills: Investigating text features and rater reactions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa).

Witte, S.P. & Faigley, L., (1981). Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality. College composition and communication, 32(2), pp.189-204.

Yang, W. and Sun, Y., (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), pp.31-48.

Zha, P., Walczyk, J.J., Griffith-Ross, D.A., Tobacyk, J.J. and Walczyk, D.F., (2006). The impact of culture and individualism–collectivism on the creative potential and achievement of American and Chinese adults. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), pp.355-366.

Zhang, S., (1999). Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.321-326.

Article Statistic

Abstract view : 428 times
PDF views : 121 times

The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off

Full Text: PDF

How To Cite This :


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Andri Saputra, M. Arif Rahman Hakim

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.