The concept of “Kampus Merdeka†in the current policy of Indonesian higher education: ELT lecturers’ perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v4i1.2440Abstract
This study aims to advance global readers’ understanding of current Indonesian higher education policy associated with students’ rights.  The researcher conducted document analysis on official regulations and interviewed lecturers to gain data about their response on the policy. The most obvious findings to emerge from this study that the Indonesian government tries to address the global challenges of higher education by transforming the paradigm of learning limited not to only classroom activities, instead providing flexibility for students to learn outside the classroom. Students should have flexibility to explore their competences by applying directly to either the societies or workplaces. Students should realise that experience is the best life-teacher to lead them to be independent and strong individuals. Learning should not always take place in the classroom; however, every place can be a medium for learning, since nature is the source of learning. Regardless the participants’ views on the current policy as the impacts neoliberal ideology, this transformation is supposed to provides positive impacts not only on students’ personal but also social, academic, and ethical domains by balancing their academic and social lives. In addition, the current policy is also intended to prepare students to respond global competitiveness and rapidly transforming societies, workplaces, and environments by mastering demanding competencies in the 21st century. Therefore, rapidly curriculum adjustment is always needed in responding any social phenomena that may significantly affect the policy making of educational system, as contextualised by the present study from Indonesian context dealing with the demands to conduct ELT curriculum adjustment as the response on the current policy. The implications of the findings are further discussed.
Keywords: Higher education; Indonesian higher education policy; Kampus Merdeka; Students’ rights
References
Astin, A. W., Sax, L. J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39, 251-263. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=slcehighered
Azra, A. (2008). Indonesian higher education: From public good to privatization. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1(2), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516230802094411
Bacevic, J. (2019). Knowing Neoliberalism. Social Epistemology 33(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1638990
Ball, S. J. (2015). Living the Neo-Liberal University. European Journal of Education, 50(3), 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12132
Beattie, J. W., Thornton, B., & Laden, R. (2013). 21st century challenges in higher education: Strategic changes and unintended consequences. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(1), 62-71. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1012986.pdf
Bourn, D. (2016). Global citizenship and youth participation in Europe. London: University College London.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bravo, V. Â. A., Dos Santos, L. C., Cyrino, E. G., Cyrino, A. P. P., Villardi, M. L., & Pinto, T. R. (2018). Producing research, training, health, and education in the teaching-service-community integration. Interface: Communication, Health, Education, 22(1), 1481-1491. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-57622017.0440
Brennan, J. (2002). Transformation or peproduction?. In: Enders, J., Fulton, O. (eds) Higher Education in a Globalising World. Higher Education Dynamics, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0579-1_5
Brian, T. (2016). Navigating the tides of globalisation and neoliberalism: A critical approach to 21st century tertiary education. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 13(2), 134-146. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v13i2.83
Butterworth, J., Thwaites, J., & Thwaites, G. (2008). Thinking skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.5070/L462005216
Chand, V. S., & Deshmukh, K. S. (2019). Addressing the undergraduate internship challenge in developing countries: A “learning-by-going†project based online internship model. Education and Training, 61(9), 1064-1077. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2018-0254
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th eds). London: Routledge.
Cress, C. M., Astin, H. S., Zimmerman-Oster, K., & Burkhardt, J. C. (2001). Developmental outcomes of college students’ involvement in leadership activities. Journal of College Student Development, 42(1), 15-26. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/developmental-outcomes-college-students/docview/195181299/se-2
Davidson, R. A. (2002). Community-based education and problem solving: The community health scholar program at the University of Florida. Teaching and Learning Medicine, 14(3), 178-181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1403_8
Dörnyei, Z. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 55-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587805
Dörnyei, Z. and Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.51997005
Ennis R. H. (2015) Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.) The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fox, E. (2019). Mobile technology: A tool to increase global competency among higher education students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 242-259. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.3961
Ghannam, M. T. (2007). Integration of teaching and research with community service for engineering programs. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790601116717
Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s War on Higher Education. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Goren, H., & Yemini, M. (2017). Citizenship education redefined – A systematic review of empirical studies on global citizenship education. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.02.004
Hess, N. (2001). Teaching large multilevel classes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hogan, B. E., & Trotter, L. D. (2013). Academic freedom in Canadian higher education: Universities, colleges, and institutes were not created equal. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(2), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v43i2.2427
Hooghe, M. (2003). Participation in voluntary associations and value indicators: The effect of current and previous participation experiences. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764003251198
Joseph, M., Stone, G. W., Grantham, K., Harmancioglu, N., & Ibrahim, E. (2007). An exploratory study on the value of services learning projects and their impact on community service involvement and critical thinking. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(3), 318-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880710773192
Khasanzyanova, A. (2017). How volunteering helps students to develop soft skills. International Review of Education, 63(3), 363-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-017-9645-2
Khlaisang, J., & Songkram, N. (2019). Designing a virtual learning environment system for teaching twenty-first century skills to higher education students in ASEAN. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(1), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9310-7
Kivunja, C. (2014). Innovative pedagogies in higher education to become effective teachers of 21st century skills: Unpacking the learning and innovations skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p37
Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). English as an international language beyond the ELT classroom. ELT Journal: English Language Teaching Journal, 73(4), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz018
Leuci, M. S., Hodge, S., & Tharp, S. (2014). Global leadership education: Developing emerging young leaders for community service in Missouri and Thailand. Community Development, 45(1), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2013.862559
McCafferty, S., Jacobs, G. & DaSilva Iddings, A.C. (Eds). (2006). Cooperative learning and second language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCrae, N. (2011). Nurturing critical thinking and academic freedom in the 21st century university. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 128-134. https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE915.pdf
Morris, M., & Maxey, S. (2014). The importance of English language competency in the academic success of international accounting students. Journal of Education for Business, 89(4), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2013.819315
Nokes, K. M., Nickitas, D. M., Keida, R., & Neville, S. (2005). Does service-learning increase cultural competency, critical thinking, and civic engagement. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(2), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20050201-05
O’Leary, Z. (2017). The essential guide to doing your research project (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
OECD (2016). Global competency for an inclusive world. Paris: OECD.
Olssen, M. (2016). Neoliberal competition in higher education today: Research, accountability and impact. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1100530
Oxfam. (2015). Global citizenship in the classroom: a guide for teachers. Oxford: Oxfam GB.
Panero, S. M., & Yu, M. H. (2014). English as an international language in Asia: Implications for language education. ELT Journal: English Language Teaching Journal, 68(4), 474-477. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu049
Ren, K. & Li, J. (2013). Academic freedom and university autonomy: Higher education policy perspective. Higher Education Policy, 26(4), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2013.31
Riadi, A. (2019). An empirical study on Indonesian English-curriculum changes: Opportunities and constraints in an underdeveloped region. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 1(2), 39-52. http://ejournal.iainpalopo.ac.id/index.php/ITJ/article/view/835
Sandy, W. & Shen, H. (2019). Publish to earn incentives: how do Indonesian professors respond to the new policy? Higher Education, 77(2), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0271-0
Schrecker, E. (2010). The lost soul of higher education: Corporatization, the assault on academic freedom, and the end of the American university. New York: The New Press.
Scott, G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534549
Seider, S. C., Rabinowicz, S. A., Gillmor, S. C. (2011). Changing American college students’ conceptions of poverty through community service learning. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11, 105-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01224.x
Solikhah, I. & Budiharso, T. (2019). Investigating the learning outcomes of an INQF-based English language teaching curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 153-175. https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/1090
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
Tan, K. H., Farashaiyan, A., & Sahragard, R. (2020). Implications of English as an international language for language pedagogy. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p22
Teferra, D. & Altbachl, P. G. (2004). African higher education: Challenges for the 21st century. Higher Education, 47(1), 21-50. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000009822.49980.30
Tilstra, D. (2008). Leadership development in higher education: What the research shows is working and why. The Journal of Applied Christian Leadership, 2(2), 18-25. https://www.andrews.edu/services/jacl/article_archive/2_2_summer_2008/2-ls-dev-in-higher-e.pdf
Tyndall, D. E., Kosko, D. A., Forbis, K. M., & Sullivan, W. B. (2020). Mutual benefits of a service-learning community – academic partnership. Journal of Nursing Education, 59(2), 93-96. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20200122-07
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waghid, Y. (2002). Knowledge production and higher education transformation in South Africa: Towards reflexivity in university teaching, research and community service. Higher Education, 43(4), 457-488. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015211718131
Williams, R. L. (2006). Academic freedom in higher education within a conservative sociopolitical culture. Innovative Higher Education, 31(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9005-9
Yuwono, U. (2019). Ideologies underpinning the Indonesian National Qualification Framework (IQF) for higher education website text. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3):668-677. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15271
Zain-Al-Dien, M. M. (2016). Student academic freedom in Egypt: Perceptions of university education students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 432-444. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040218
Zepke, N. (2012). What of the future for academic freedom in higher education in Aotearoa New Zealand? Policy Futures in Education, 10(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.2.155
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
