The Role of Online Resources in Developing Autonomous Learning Metacognitive Skills Among First-Year University Students of English: A Mixed Methods Study

Authors

  • Yahya Bouhafa Binghamton University, USA, United States
  • Shelby R. Hochberg Columbia University, New York, USA, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v4i1.2567

Abstract

This mixed methods study examines the way online resources can be effective in developing the learning autonomy metacognitive skills of planning, monitoring, and self-evaluation among undergraduate students at the Facultyof Letters and Humanities Fes-Agdal, which is representative of the socio-cultural and higher education system of Morocco. The sample consisted of an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group consisted of 120 students who were exposed to three main online tools (Newsela.com, mrnussbaum.com, and rewordify.com), with virtual meetings and instruction provided through Facebook. The Facebook groups were kept secret, with only participants joining. The control group consisted of 120 students that benefited only from the university’s regular reading courses. The experimental intervention period was followed by interviews with a sample of 25 students from both groups, providing a qualitative perspective. The overall results suggest that online resources have a positive effect on the development of metacognitive skills. Students tend to appreciate the inclusion of online resources in the classroom without devaluing the role of their EFL teacher – the students did not expect online resources to fully replace the role of their teachers.

Keywords: EFL online learning autonomy; learning autonomy; online resources; teaching and learning in higher education

References

Alonazi, S. M. (2017). The Role of Teachers in Promoting Learner Autonomy in Secondary Schools in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p183

Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Alberta, CA: Athabasca University Press.

Ariza, A., & Sánchez, M. S. (2013). Effectiveness of the integration of ICT tools and activities to foster awareness as the first stage to reach learning autonomy. Gist: Education and Learning Research Journal, 23(7), 154-172. https://doi.org/10.1277/1692-5777

Benson, P. (2001) Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman.

Benson, P. (2001). Autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman

Benson, P., & Voller, P. (2014). Autonomy and independence in language learning. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.

Bernard, R. M., Brauer, A., Abrami, P. C., & Surkes, M. (2004). The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement. Distance Education, 25(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791042000212440

Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2019). Language learner autonomy in a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817725759

Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research: An introduction to the theory and practice of second language research for graduate/master’s students in TESOL and applied linguistics, and others. UK: Oxford University Press.

Brown, R. (1988). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. UK: Basil Blackwell.

Bryman, A. (2008). Of methods and methodology. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640810900568

Bustamante, C., Hurlbut, S., and Moeller, A. (2012) Web 2.0 and language learners: Moving from consumers to creators. Faculty Publications: Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education Nebraska, 15(2), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.10236/10325680815910774

Castle, S. R., & McGuire, C. J. (2010). An analysis of student self-assessment of online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments: Implications for sustainable education delivery. International Education Studies, 3(3), 36-40. https://doi.org/19.139020/502656809259108846.

Chang, M. M. (2007). Enhancing webâ€based language learning through selfâ€monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 187-196. doi.org/10.1080/1750895959013.836201

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge Falmer.

Colman, A. M. (Ed.). (2019). Companion encyclopedia of psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.

Cotterall, S., & Murray, G. (2009). Enhancing metacognitive knowledge: Structure, affordances and self. System, 37(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.08.003

Crabbe, D., Elgort, I., & Gu, P. (2013). Autonomy in a networked world. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.836201

Dang, T. T., & Robertson, M. (2010). Impacts of learning management system on learner autonomy in EFL learning. International Education Studies, 3(3), 3-11. DOI.org/1045548/888499.6201

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Goodman, N. D., & Stuhlmüller, A. (2013). Knowledge and implicature: Modeling language understanding as social cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(1), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12007

Han, L. (2014). Teacher’s role in developing learner autonomy: A literature review. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v1n2p21

Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Facilitating collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 7-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i1.1769

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Council of Europe, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

Kauffman, D. F., Zhao, R., & Yang, Y. S. (2011). Effects of online note taking formats and self-monitoring prompts on learning from online text: Using technology to enhance self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 313-322. https://doi.org/12.56659/jhd.45899622

Kim, S. (2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 20-35. https://doi.org/19.137023/9108846

Li, Y. (2016). Empirical research on college students’ English autonomous learning ability and self-efficacy]. Modern Foreign Language (Bimonthly), 39(2), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n11p76

Little, D. (1991). Varieties of social explanation. Boulder: Westview Press.

Little, D. (1996). Freedom to learn and compulsion to interact: promoting learner autonomy through the use of information systems and information technologies. Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning, 1, 203-218. https://doi.org/19.2568/1871730708

Marzban, A. (2011). Improvement of reading comprehension through computer-assisted language learning in Iranian intermediate EFL students. Procedia Computer Science, 3(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.003

Moubtassime, M. & Bouhafa, Y. (2017). An examination of Motivation and Anxiety Among Moroccan First Year Students of English at Dhar Mehraz University. Publications du Pôle de recherche : Langues, Communication & Arts (LCA), 2(2), 25-34 https://doi.org/19.145962/547899108846

Mynard, J. (2017). Book review: Language learner autonomy: Theory, practice and research by David Little, Leni Dam and Lienhard Legenhausen. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 8(4), 362-370. https://doi.org/10.37237/080408

Oliver, M. (2000). An introduction to the evaluation of learning technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(4), 20-30. https://doi.org/19.84560/509108778

Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace. Network-based language teaching: Concepts and Practice, 12(2), 59-86. https://doi.org/5487942/32648974

Porte, G. K. (2010). Appraising research in second language learning: A practical approach to critical analysis of quantitative research. London: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.28

Ramírez-Correa, P. E., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Rondán-Cataluña, F. J. (2015). Gender and acceptance of e-learning: a multi-group analysis based on a structural equation model among college students in Chile and Spain. PloS one, 10(10), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140460

Reinders, H. (2018). Technology and autonomy. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 5(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0433

Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/189746/55415915489

Rogers, D & A. B., Wolff (2000). Developing a technology-based distance education intermediate Spanish course. Journal of General Education, 49(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/1989520/558879

Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Overt bias in observational studies. New York, NY: Springer

Sanprasert, N. (2010). The application of a course management system to enhance autonomy in learning English as a foreign language. System, 38(1), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/89200912010

Schwienhorst, K. (2012). Learner autonomy and CALL environments. London: Routledge.

Seliger, H. W., Seliger, H., Shohamy, E., & Shohamy, E. G. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sojisirikul, P., & Intratat, C. (2008). Initial step to autonomous learning: A case study from the Self-evaluation of KMUTT Students. KMUTT Research and Development Journal, 31(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215609230

Szőcs, K. (2017). Teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about language learning autonomy and its implications in the classroom: A mixed method study. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, 11(1), 14-31 https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201708233542

Ushioda, Ema (2011) A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In: Z. Dörnyei , E. Ushioda (eds.) Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Second language acquisition (pp. 215-228). Buffalo, N.Y: Multilingual Matters

Vieira, F., Barbosa, I., Paiva, M., & Fernandes, I. S. (2008). Teacher education towards teacher (and learner) autonomy. Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses, 217(1), 236-246 https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.1.18vie

Warschauer, M., & Healy, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: an overview. Warschauer, 15(2), 516-549 https://doi.org/19.139020/5023265

Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 515-537. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515

White, L. (2003) On the nature of interlanguage representation: Universal grammar in the second language. In C. J. Doughty and M.H. Long (eds.). The Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 19-42). Oxford: Blackwell.

Yang, M. N. (2007). Language learning strategies for junior college students in Taiwan: Investigating ethnicity and proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 35-57. https://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0505.05

Zhang, L.X. & Li X.X. (2004). A comparative study on learner autonomy between Chinese students and west European students. Foreign Language World, 4(1), 15-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.41821

Downloads

Published

2022-03-30

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Indonesian TESOL Journal (March)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)