An Acoustic Analysis of Word Stress Production by Indonesian Learners of English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v5i2.4167Keywords:
, Acoustic analysis, Praat, Word stress, Intensity, EFL studentsAbstract
:   Although word stress is a crucial aspect of English speaking, it is not given much emphasis in Indonesia's EFL instruction. Students, consequently, lack the theoretical understanding of how to properly stress syllables in English words. This study uses a program named Praat to examine the acoustic parameters of word stress produced by EFL students in terms of its intensity level. These parameters can indicate whether the students pronounce two-syllable words of nouns and verbs accurately. The subjects of this research were the third-year students of English Education Department who were selected purposively based on the students’ results of EF SET (Standardized English Test). The findings revealed that the students produced more inaccurate word stress when pronouncing nouns than they did when pronouncing verbs. Moreover, the inaccurate word stress produced by the students was divided into three categories: equation stress, no-stress placement, and reverse stress. Among the three categories, equation stress is the most common error found in this study. This study provides insight into the features of word stress and the acoustic measurement of word stress produced by Indonesian learners of English. It implies that there is a need to integrate explicit instruction on word stress. This could involve dedicated lessons on stress placement, incorporating practical exercises and feedback mechanisms to help students develop a theoretical understanding and practical skills in pronouncing English words accurately. The study also encourages future research in related areas, suggesting a focus on other pronunciation problems like intonation. This broader approach to research can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges Indonesian learners face in mastering English pronunciation that can provide a foundation for curriculum development and instructional strategies aimed at enhancing English language proficiency in Indonesia.    Â
References
Ahmad, W. (2012). Instrumental phonetic study of the rhythm of Malay. Unpublished Thesis. Newcastle University.
Al-Kubaisy, O.S.E. (2018). Placement of stress in English and its effect on meaning. Unpublished Thesis. University of Anbar.
Alkhuli, M. (2002). English phonetics and phonology. Dar Alfalah, Jordan.
Baixone, B.C. (2015). English syllable – phonetic and phonology. Mozambique: Department of Language Sciences, Communication and Arts.
Crane, L. B. (1981). An Introduction to Linguistics. Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational Research. Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. London: Pearson Education.
Cruttenden, A. (2001). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. 6th ed. London: Arnold.
Gordon, M., & Ladefoged, P. (2001). Phonation types: a cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0147
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Longman.
Harrington, J., Beckman, M. E. Fletcher, J., & Palethorpe, S. (1998). An electropalatographic, kinematic, and acoustic analysis of supralaryngeal correlates of word and utterance-level prominence contrasts in English. In Proceedings of the 1998 international conference on spoken language processing (vol. 1854, pp.1851–1854). Sydney, Australia.
Indrayani, L. M., & Rizki, V. (2019). The Production of word stress patterns in English noun to verb conversion words by adult EFL learners in Indonesia: A Phonological Study. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 4(6), 1940-1945. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijels.46.49
Jones, D., Roach, Peter., Setter, J., & Esling, J. (2011), English pronouncing dictionary (18th Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Karjo, C. H. (2016). Accounting for learner’s errors in word stress placement. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1344
Krisdianata, Y. Y., & Bram, B. (2022). Word stress errors made by English education master’s program students. Academic Journal PERSPECTIVE: Language, Education and Literature, 10(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v10i1.6763
Laia, Y. E. (2022). Analysis of voice level comparison through pitch and formant value identification. International Journal of Forensic Linguistic, 3(1), 90-97. https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/ijfl/article/view/4614
Lasut, P. A. (2015). Word stress contribution in second language acquisition. Phenomena, 15(2), 163-167. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v15i2.200
Lieberman, P. (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32(4), 451–454. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1121/1.1908095
Lieshout, P. V. (2003). PRAAT short tutorial: A basic introduction. University of Toronto, Graduate Department of SpeechLanguage Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oral Dynamics Lab. https://web.stanford.edu/dept/linguistics/corpora/material/PRAAT_workshop_manual_v421.pdf
Margareth, R. S. (2020). An analysis of word stress pronounced by the seventh semester students at English department of FKIP UIR. Thesis. Universitas Islam Riau Pekan Baru. https://repository.uir.ac.id/10840/1/166310913.pdf
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. and Saldana, J. (2014) Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. London: SAGE.
Pope, C. and Mays, N. (1995) Qualitative research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal, 311, 42-45. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42
Rana, G. S. (2016). Acoustic analysis of the speech: Role in improved speaking skills through intrusive insight in language classroom discourse speech behavior. International Journal of Science, Technology, and Management, 5(11), 147-158. http://www.ijstm.com/images/short_pdf/1479566133_145ijstm.pdf
Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suciati, S. (2021). Suprasegmental features of Indonesian students’ English pronunciation and the pedagogical implication. SAGA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2020.21.62
Underhill, A (1994). The teacher development series: Sound foundations living phonology. Great Britain: The Bath Press.
Widagsa, R., Wiyanah, S., & Wahyuni, P. (2019). The influence of Indonesian prosodic features on English word stress production. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1647
Widayanti, M. N. C. (2022). Measurement of the highest vowel pitch and formant using PRAAT. International Journal of Forensic Linguistic, 3(1), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.22225/ijfl.3.1.4775.75-80
Yana, W. K. (2017). An analysis of L2 stress patterns of polysyllabic academic vocabulary of Indonesian students. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 10(2), 358-375. https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/ENGEDU
Zanten, E. V., & Goedemans, R. (2009). Prominence in Indonesian stress, phrases, and boundaries. Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 11(2), 197-225. https://doi.org/10.17510/wjhi.v11i2.158
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
