Japanese students' interaction using smartphone apps: a study of young learners in a private high school

Authors

  • Jason Somerville Kyorin University, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v1i2.836

Keywords:

Applications, Learner Collaboration, Smartphone, Student-student Interaction

Abstract

The widespread use of mobile devices plays a significant role in our everyday lives and has changed the way we communicate and interact. Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) offers numerous opportunities for learning inside the classroom with mobile devices no longer seen as only social and gaming devices. Research shows that mobile device applications (apps) are now valuable tools which are used for education and language learning, in particular for promoting learner collaboration and social interaction. The purpose of this study is to discover how smartphones and apps can support greater student interaction. With an increased number of educational institutions, namely private junior and senior high schools in Japan embracing mobile technology into classroom pedagogy, this study investigates which smartphone repurposed apps are useful for encouraging interaction between students. The significance of this research is beneficial for learners, teacher-educators and app developers in advancing the benefits of social interaction in second language acquisition (SLA) utilising mobile devices. Through qualitative structured observation of participants in a Tokyo high school classroom, this study explores which smartphone apps are the most successful in encouraging interaction measured by frequency counts. The quantitative data reveal which apps are the most suitable for supporting greater social interaction and collaboration between learners. The implications derived from the findings support the argument that smartphones provide increased student-student interaction and collaboration.

Author Biography

Jason Somerville, Kyorin University

Director, Kyorin Writing Center

Special Lecturer, Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Studies

References

Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., (Eds.) (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn and Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group)

Bales, R. F. (1951). Interactional Process Analysis. Cambridge, Addison Wesley.

Beaver, A. (2016). Social interaction and design in an online multiliteracy center (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University Of Colorado at Boulder.

Bellack, A. A. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Bicen, H., and Kocakoyun, S. (2013). The evaluation of the most used mobile devices applications by students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 756-760.

Bloom, B.S. and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. NY, NY: Longmans, Green.

Brett, P. (2011). Students' experiences and engagement with SMS for learning in higher education. Innovations in Edu. and Teaching Int.,48(2), 137-147.

Brown, J. D. (2014). Mixed methods research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Burnett, C. (2010). Technology and literacy in early childhood educational settings: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 247–270.

Burrows, C. (2008). Socio-cultural barriers facing TBL in Japan. The Language Teacher, (32)8, 15-19.

Burston, J. (2014). The reality of MALL project implementations: Still on the fringes. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 43–65.

Bygate, M. 2005. Structuring learning within the flux of communication: A role for constructive repetition in oral language pedagogy. In New dimensions in the teaching of oral communication, ed. J. A. Foley, 70–90. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Caballe, S., Xhada, F., Baroli, L. (2010). Using mobile devices to support online collaborative learning. Mobile Information Systems, 6, 27–47.

Caldwell, K., and Atwal, A. (2005). Non-participant observation: Using video tapes to collect data in nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 13(2), 42-54.

Chang, S.E., and Vera Pa, Y.H. (2011). Exploring factors influencing mobile users' intention to adopt multimedia messaging service. Behav.Inf. Technol, 30(5), 659–672.

Chik, A. (2015). English Language Teaching Apps: Reconceptualizing Learners, Parents, and Teachers. In: Dixon, E and Thomas, M. (eds) Researching Language Learner Interactions Online: From Social Media to MOOCs. CALICO Monograph Series (13), 29 - 44.

Chung, C. W., Lee, C. C., and Liu, C. C. (2013). Investigating face-to-face peer interaction patterns in a collaborative Web discovery task: The benefits of a shared display. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 188–206.

Cochrane, R. (2015). Activities and reflection for influencing beliefs about learning with smartphones. Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy, 138–143.

Copland, F., and Garton, S. (2014). Editor’s choice: Key themes and future directions in teaching English to young learners: Introduction to the Special Issue. ELT Journal, 68(3), 223–230.

Croll, P. (1986). Systematic classroom observation. London: Falmer Press.

Dashtestani, R. (2015). Moving bravely towards mobile learning: Iranian students' use of mobile devices for learning English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-18.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research 33–56. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Educational Testing Service. 2014. Test content. TOEIC. Retrieved August, 2019 from www.ets.org/toeic/speaking_writing/about/content.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Flanders, N. A. (1970) PEPBL: Methodology working paper 6: Flanders Interactional Analysis. Retrieved August, 2016 from the World Wide Web:www.hebes.mds.ac.uk

Frymier, A. B. (2005). Students’ classroom communication effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 53, 197–212.

Fujimoto, C. (2012). Perceptions of mobile language learning in Australia: How ready are learners to study on the move? JALT CALL Journal, 8(3), 165–195.

Fukuzawa, R. and LeTendre, G. (2001). Intense Years: How Japanese Adolescents Balance School, Family and Friends. New York: Routledge.

Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., and Johnson, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: The first decade and beyond. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 10, 13–48. New York, NY: Routledge.

Gray, D. (2014). Doing research in the real world (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Gutiérrez, G. A. (2006). Sociocultural theory and its application to CALL: A study of the computer and its relevance as a mediational tool in the process of collaborative activity. ReCALL, 18(02), 230-250.

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Kim, H., and Kwon, Y. (2012). Exploring smartphone applications for effective mobile-assisted language learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 15(1), 31–57.

Knoch, U., Rouhshad, A., Oon, S. P., and Storch, N. (2015). What happens to ESL students’ writing after three years of study at an English medium university? Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 39-52.

Mobile phone users in Japan 2013-2020 | Statistics. (2016, June 10). Retrieved August 30, 2019, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/274672/forecast-of-mobile-phone-users-in-japan/

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCall, 21(2), 157-165.

Kukulska-Hulme, A and Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20, 271-289.

Kuo, I. C. V. (2011). Student perceptions of student interaction in a British EFL setting. ELT Journal, 65(3), 281–290.

Lantolf, J. and Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. In. B. van Patten and J. Williams (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. 201-224. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lockley, T., and Promnitz-Hayashi, L. (2012). Japanese university students’ CALL attitudes, aspirations and motivations. CALL-EJ Online, 13(1), 1-16.

Long, M. (1983). ‘Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom’, in M. Clarke and J. Handscombe (eds), On TESOL 82: Pacific perspectives on language and teaching. Washington, DC: TESOL.

Long, M. (1996). ‘The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition’, in W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds). Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press, 413-468.

Marchionini, G. (2006). Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49, 41–46.

Mavrou, K., Lewis, A., and Douglas, G. (2010). Researching computer-based collaborative learning in inclusive classrooms in Cyprus: The role of the computer in pupils’ interaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 486–501.

Mitchell, R., Myles, F., and Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories. New York: Routledge.

Nation, P. (1989). Improving speaking fluency. System, 17, 377–384.

Parcha, J. M. (2014). Accommodating Twitter: Communication Accommodation Theory and Classroom Interactions. Communication Teacher, 28(4), 229–235.

Philp, J., Adams, R. J., and Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction and second language learning. Oxon: Routledge.

Pollard, A. (2015). Increasing Awareness and Talk Time through Free Messaging Apps. English Teaching Form, 25–32.

Poulou, M. S. (2009). Classroom interactions: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Research in Education, 82, 103–106.

Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Robson, C. (2012). Real world research. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.

Robson, C., and McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.

Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge Introductions to Language and Linguistics.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 3–32. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Siskin, C. (n.d.). Language Learning Applications for Smartphones, or Small Can Be Beautiful. Retrieved August 30, 2016, from http://www.edvista.com/claire/pres/smartphones/

Stuart, S., Brown, M. I., and Draper, S. W. (2004). Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures : one practitioner’s application, (i), 95–102.

Swain, M. (1997) Collaborative dialogue: Its contribution to second language learning. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 34, 115–132.

Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In: Bygate, M., Skehan, P., and Swain, M. (eds.) Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. London: Longman, 99–18.

Takahashi, T. (2008). Japanese young people, media and everyday life, towards the internationalizing of media studies. In K. Drotner and S. Livingstone (Eds.), International Handbook of children, media and culture, 413-430. London: Sage.

Thomas, G. (2013). How to do your research project: A guide for students in education and applied social sciences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Thornbury, S. 2005. Uncovering grammar: How to help grammar emerge. Oxford: Macmillan Education.

Ting, Y. (2013). Using mobile technologies to create interwoven learning interactions: An intuitive design and its evaluation. Computers and Education, 60(1), 1-13.

Troussas, C., Virvou, M., and Alepis, E. (2014). Collaborative Learning: Group Interaction in an Intelligent Mobile-Assisted Multiple Language Learning System. Informatics in Education InfEdu, 13(2), 279-292.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Yoshida, R. (2008). Learners’ perception of corrective feedback in pair work. Foreign Language Annals, 41(3), 525–541.

Zurita, G., and Nussbaum, M. (2004). A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 235–243.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-01

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Indonesian TESOL Journal (October)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)