Reinterpreting Presidential Educational Requirements in Indonesia: Constitutional Court Decision No. 87/PUU-XXIII/2025 from the Perspective of Siyasah Dusturiyah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/jiis.v5i2.10684Keywords:
Constitutional Court Decision, Open Legal Policy, Presidential Educational Requirement, Siyasah Dusturiyah, Maslahah ‘AmmahAbstract
Constitutional Court Decision Number 87/PUU-XXIII/2025 concerning the minimum educational requirements for presidential and vice-presidential candidates has generated constitutional debate regarding the balance between democratic inclusiveness and leadership competency in Indonesia’s constitutional system. The decision rejected the petition seeking reinterpretation of Article 169 letter r of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, which requires candidates to possess at least a senior high school diploma or its equivalent. This study aims to analyze the juridical foundation of the Constitutional Court’s reasoning within the doctrine of open legal policy, examine its implications for constitutional loss and judicial review access, and evaluate the relevance of the minimum educational requirement from the perspective of siyasah dusturiyah. This research employs normative juridical methods with statute and conceptual approaches using constitutional regulations, court decisions, and Islamic political thought as primary analytical sources. The findings reveal that the Constitutional Court reaffirmed the doctrine of open legal policy and judicial restraint by emphasizing that the determination of educational qualifications for presidential candidates belongs to legislative authority as long as constitutional principles are preserved. The decision also strengthens the Court’s restrictive interpretation of constitutional loss by limiting judicial review access to applicants who can demonstrate direct constitutional injury. From the perspective of siyasah dusturiyah, however, the minimum educational requirement of senior high school graduation is considered substantively inadequate because it does not fully reflect the principle of kifayah ‘ilmiyyah emphasized by Al-Mawardi and may potentially undermine maslahah ‘ammah in contemporary governance. This study argues that leadership competency should be positioned as an important component of constitutional morality and public welfare within Indonesia’s constitutional democracy.
References
Adji, A. B., Mau, H. A., & Candra, M. (2024). Konstitusionalitas perubahan usia calon presiden dan calon wakil presiden dalam negara hukum demokrasi. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v3i1.2116
An-Na’im, A. A. (2008). Islam and the secular state: Negotiating the future of Shari‘a. Harvard University Press.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Bisariyadi. (2016). Penafsiran konsep kerugian konstitusional terhadap standing to sue dalam perkara pengujian undang-undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1311
Bhatia, G. (2014). The transformative constitution: A radical biography in nine acts. HarperCollins India.
Bruckmeyer, F. (2025). Educational attainment and crisis leadership performance during COVID-19. Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12891
Butt, S. (2015). The constitutional court and democracy in Indonesia. Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004250598
Butt, S. (2018). Religious conservatism, Islamic criminal law and the judiciary in Indonesia: A tale of three courts. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 50(3), 402–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1532025
Dixon, R. (2007). Creating dialogue about socioeconomic rights: Strong-form versus weak-form judicial review revisited. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(3), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mom021
Dyzenhaus, D. (2006). The constitution of law: Legality in a time of emergency. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619498
Eddyono, L. W. (2017). Independence of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in norms and practices. Constitutional Review, 3(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev314
Faiz, P. M. (2016). Dimensi judicial activism dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(2), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1328
Hosen, N. (2005). Religion and the Indonesian Constitution: A recent debate. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 36(3), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463405000238
Kamali, M. H. (1998). Freedom, equality and justice in Islam. Islamic Texts Society.
Lindsey, T., & Butt, S. (2018). Indonesian constitutional reform: Muddling towards democracy. In D. Bourchier & J. Legge (Eds.), Democracy in Indonesia (pp. 23–45). Monash University Publishing.
March, A. F. (2009). Political Islam theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153444
Muttaqin, L., Omara, A., Atmoredjo, S., & AR, M. F. (2025). Is the legislator in the Constitutional Court? Examining the tension between judiciary and democracy in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v10i1.13494
Pelzl, P., & Poelhekke, S. (2023). Political leaders’ education and economic development. European Journal of Political Economy, 78, 102382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102382
Pompe, S. (2005). The Indonesian Supreme Court: A study of institutional collapse. Cornell Southeast Asia Program.
Al-Mawardi. (n.d.). Al-ahkam al-sultaniyyah wa al-wilayat al-diniyyah. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Republik Indonesia. (1945). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. (2017). Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2025). Constitutional Court Decision Number 87/PUU-XXIII/2025.
Susanti, B. (2017). The Constitutional Court and democracy in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 53(1), 97–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1239310
Wiratraman, H. P. (2018). Constitutional Court and democracy in Indonesia, by Simon Butt. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 174(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17401005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anissa Rizqi Syafitri, Bobang Noorisnan Pelita, Ridwan Eko Prasetyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies agree to the following terms:
- Authors have retained full articles copyright and grant the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see also deposit policy and archiving on page journal).
