The Methodology of Tafsir Ishari and a Critical Analysis from the Perspective of Qur’anic Exegesis Studies

Authors

  • Mansur Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, NTB, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/jiis.v5i2.12073

Keywords:

tafsir ishari, Qur'anic exegesis, Sufi interpretation, Islamic epistemology, Qur'anic hermeneutics

Abstract

Tafsir ishari represents one of the distinctive traditions within Qur'anic exegesis that seeks to uncover the inner spiritual meanings of Qur'anic verses beyond their apparent textual expressions. Although this interpretive approach has significantly contributed to the development of Islamic spirituality and Sufi thought, its methodological validity continues to generate scholarly debate due to concerns regarding subjectivity, epistemological legitimacy, and the absence of standardized interpretive procedures. This study aims to examine the conceptual foundations, methodological characteristics, and critical issues surrounding tafsir ishari from the perspective of contemporary Qur'anic exegesis studies. Employing a qualitative library research design with descriptive-analytical and critical approaches, the study analyzes classical and contemporary literature concerning Sufi exegesis, Qur'anic interpretation, and Islamic epistemology. The findings indicate that tafsir ishari functions primarily as an epistemological orientation that complements rather than replaces the outward (zahir) interpretation of the Qur'an. Its interpretive process is characterized by reliance on spiritual inspiration (ilham), symbolic interpretation, and ethical contemplation while maintaining consistency with the literal meaning of the text. Nevertheless, the study identifies three major methodological challenges, namely the absence of a standardized interpretive framework, the epistemological limitations of inspiration as a source of knowledge, and tensions between symbolic interpretation and established principles of Arabic linguistics. The study concludes that tafsir ishari should be understood as a valuable spiritual-hermeneutical tradition whose academic legitimacy depends upon maintaining methodological transparency, linguistic coherence, and epistemological accountability. This research contributes to contemporary Qur'anic exegesis by proposing a balanced analytical framework that integrates the spiritual richness of Sufi interpretation with the methodological rigor required in modern Qur'anic studies.

References

Abdul Basit. (2018). Metodologi tafsir sufistik dalam tradisi Islam. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Abdussalam al-Muhtasib, Abdul Majid. (1997). Visi dan Paradigma Tafsir Al-Qur’an Kontemporer (terj. Moh. Maghfur Wachid). Bangil: Al-Izzah.

Amaliatussolihah, dkk. (2024). Mengulik sejarah perkembangan tafsir isyari dan pandangan ulama. Ar-Rosyad: Jurnal Keislaman dan Sosial Humaniora, 2(2). Diakses 21 Oktober 2025.

Al-Alūsī, M. S. (1994). Rūḥ al-Maʿānī fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm wa al-Sabʿ al-Mathānī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Al-Ghazālī, A. Ḥ. M. (2005). Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah.

Al-Naisaburi, Hasan. (1962). Gharaib al-Qur’an wa Raghaib al-Furqan Juz I. Kairo: Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi.

Al-Qaththan, Mannā’. (2006). Pengantar Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar.

Al-Qushayrī, A. Q. (2000). Laṭāʾif al-Ishārāt. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Al-Suyūṭī, J. (2008). Al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Al-Ṭabarī, M. J. (2001). Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān. Cairo: Dār Hijr.

Al-Zarkashī, B. (2006). Al-Burhān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

As-Shalih, Subhi. (1995). Membahas Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an (terj. Tim Pustaka Firdaus). Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus.

Ash-Shiddieqy, Teungku Muhammad Hasbi. (1994). Sejarah dan Pengantar Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Ash-Shiddieqy, Teungku Muhammad Hasbi. (2009). Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an. Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Utama.

As-Suyuthi, Jalaluddin. (2006). Samudera Ulumul Qur’an (terj. Farikh Marzuqi A., Wafi M. A., Imam Fauzi J.). Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

Basit, Abdul, & Nawawi, Fuad. (2019). Epistemologi tafsir isyari. Jurnal Al-Fath, 13(1), 68–87. Diakses 23 Oktober 2025.

Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. (1989). Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya. Surabaya: Mahkota.

Djalal, Abdul. (2011). Ulumul Qur’an. Surabaya: Dunia Ilmu.

Fahmi Salim. (2010). Kritik terhadap Studi Al-Qur’an Kaum Liberal. Depok: Perspektif.

Godlas, A. (2017). Ṣūfism. In A. Rippin & J. Mojaddedi (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Qur'an (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118964873.ch27

Hashim, M. (2019). Tafsir Sufi al-Isyari and its comparison with Tafsir al-Batiniah, Tafsir Sufi of Philosophy and Tafsir Scientific Ishari. Ulum Islamiyyah, 27(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol27no1.132

Hermansyah. (2022). Sejarah perkembangan munculnya tafsir isyari dan contoh-contoh penafsirannya. El-Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 17(8), 102–125. Diakses 25 Oktober 2025.

Holtzman, L. (2021). Seeing God in Sufi Qurʾan Commentaries: Crossings Between This World and the Otherworld. Ilahiyat Studies, 12(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2021.122.229

Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. (1996). Madārij al-Sālikīn. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī.

Ibn Kathīr, I. (1999). Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm. Riyadh: Dār Ṭayyibah.

Ibn ʿArabī, M. (2004). Al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyyah. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir.

Ibnu Katsir. (2012). Keajaiban dan Keistimewaan Al-Qur’an (terj. Ahmad Hapid & Mukhlish Abu al-Mugni). Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam.

Mahrani, Nana. (2017). Tafsir al-isyari. Jurnal Hikmah, 14(1). Diakses 25 Oktober 2025.

Maulana, Luthfi. (2018). Studi tafsir sufi: Tafsir Latha’if al-Isyarat Imam al-Qusyairi. Hermeneutik: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 12(1), 1–19. Diakses 25 Oktober 2025.

Midrar Sa’dina, Ahmad, & Zaelani, Agung Ahmad. (2023). Pro dan kontra dalam tafsir sufi. Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas, 3(1), 1–10. Diakses 25 Oktober 2025.

Nurfauzia, Fiqria, dkk. (2022). Memahami pesan Al-Qur’an dan pendekatan tafsir isyari. Al-Akbar: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 8(1). Diakses 23 Oktober 2025.

Quraish Shihab, M. (2013). Kaidah Tafsir. Tangerang: Lentera Hati.

Quraish Shihab, M. (2017). Membumikan Al-Qur'an (Rev. ed.). Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Quraish Shihab, M. (2019). Tafsir Al-Mishbah (Vols. 1–15). Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Saifuddin, A. (2017). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sak, H. İ. (2026). An assessment of the distinction between Ishārī Tafsīr and Taṣawwufī Tafsīr. Al-Shajarah, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v31i1.2337

Suma, Moh. Amin. (2001). Pengantar Tafsir Ahkam. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Supriyanto, S. (2025). Sufi Isyari Exegesis and Its Implications for Contemporary Qur’anic Interpretation. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(4), 3283–3292. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i4.1477

Syauky, A., & Syabuddin, S. (2025). Significance of Tafsir Isyari Values in the Modern Era. Al-Shamela: Journal of Quranic and Hadith Studies, 3(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.61994/alshamela.v3i1.731

Wahid, Abd. (2010). Tafsir isyari dalam pandangan Imam al-Ghazali. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 16(2), 123–135. Diakses 25 Oktober 2025.

Yudistira, T., & Syarifuddin, M. A. (2025). Epistemologi penafsiran esoterik Al-Qur'an: Diskursus tafsir dan takwil dalam tradisi sufistik. Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/refleksi.v25.i1.48636

Zarqānī, M. A. (2001). Manāhil al-ʿIrfān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Zulki, Ahmad. (2017). Komparasi Tafsir Isyari antara Ahlussunnah dan Syi’ah. Jakarta: Institut PTIQ.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-03

How to Cite

Mansur. (2026). The Methodology of Tafsir Ishari and a Critical Analysis from the Perspective of Qur’anic Exegesis Studies. Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies, 5(2), 908–923. https://doi.org/10.24256/jiis.v5i2.12073

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.