Reorienting Bloom’s Taxonomy: Toward a Tawhid-Based Paradigm of Islamic Educational Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/jiis.v5i1.12275Keywords:
Bloom``s Taxonomy, Islamic Religious Education, Educational Evaluation, Tawhid-Based EvaluationAbstract
The widespread use of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Islamic Religious Education (IRE) evaluation provides a systematic framework for measuring cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning outcomes. However, its application remains predominantly oriented toward measurable competencies and does not fully represent the spiritual and moral dimensions that constitute the broader aims of Islamic education. This study aims to critically examine the limitations of Bloom’s Taxonomy in IRE evaluation and reconstruct its paradigm based on tawhid as the fundamental orientation of educational evaluation. In this reconstruction, tawhid is understood not merely as a dimension of faith, but as an epistemological and axiological foundation that integrates knowledge, values, practice, and character within a unified conception of human development. This study employs a qualitative approach using library research. Data were obtained from relevant scholarly literature on Bloom’s Taxonomy, educational assessment, Islamic Religious Education, Islamic educational objectives, and value-based education, supplemented by the Qur’an and Hadith as normative sources. Data were analyzed through content analysis involving reduction, categorization, comparison, interpretation, and conceptual synthesis. The findings indicate that the main limitation of Bloom’s Taxonomy does not lie in its cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, but in the tendency to position competency attainment as the endpoint of evaluation. From a tawhid perspective, educational evaluation should integrate intellectual, spiritual, moral, and practical dimensions within a unified framework. The proposed reconstruction repositions iman (faith) as the orienting foundation, ‘ilm (knowledge) as the epistemic basis, internalization of values as the affective process, ‘amal (practice) as the actualization of learning, and akhlak (character) as the integrative manifestation of educational transformation. Tawhid thus functions as the unifying principle connecting knowledge, belief, internalization, practice, and character formation. This reconstruction shifts IRE evaluation from competency measurement toward holistic personality transformation while retaining the pedagogical strengths of Bloom’s Taxonomy.
References
Abdullah, S., Mufid, M., Ju’subaidi, J., & Purwanto, P. (2024). Religious confusion and emptiness: Evaluating the impact of online Islamic learning among Indonesian Muslim adolescents. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V80I1.9510;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl Peter W Airasian, D. R., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). Taxonomy for Assessing a Revision 0F Bl00M’S Tax0N0My 0F Educati0Nal Objectives. https://books.google.com/books/about/A_Taxonomy_for_Learning_Teaching_and_Ass.html?hl=id&id=EMQlAQAAIAAJ
Apriansyah, A., & Razzaq, A. (2024). URGENSI ADAB DALAM MENUNTUT ILMU: PEMIKIRAN NAQUIB AL-ATTAS. Jurnal Genta Mulia, 15(2), 92–98. https://ejournal.uncm.ac.id/index.php/gm/article/view/1156
Aprilliyah, F., Febian, C., Indrawati, S., & Rohmah, D. (2024). Teori Belajar Taksonomi Bloom dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pengembangan Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 1(3), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.61692/JPEP.V1I3.370
Azizah, K. (2025). Teori Taxonomi Bloom Dan Implementasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Pelita: Jurnal Studi Islam Mahasiswa UII Dalwa, 2(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.38073/pelita.v2i2.2531
Batubara, A. U., & Matsum, H. (2025). Assessment Patterns in Islamic Education Learning on Fiqh Material: Pola Penilaian dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam pada Materi Fiqih. Halaqa: Islamic Education Journal, 9(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.21070/HALAQA.V9I1.1733
Bloom, B. S. (1956). TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES The Classification of Educational Goals. Longmans Green.
Firaudhatil Jannah, A., & Istikomah, I. (2024). Evaluasi Pembelajaran PAI pada Kurikulum Merdeka Tinjauan Manajemen. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(1), 630–644. https://doi.org/10.35931/AQ.V18I1.2706
Hanafi, S. shakhiba albira nanda, Fadhila, A. S., & Bashith, A. (2025). Pendekatan Penilaian Autentik dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI). EDUCAN : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ISLAM, 9(2), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.21111/EDUCAN.V9I2.14679
Hasanah, I., Sumarna, E., & Anwar, S. (2025). Adaptive Assessment in Islamic Religious Education for Promoting Inclusive Learning in Junior High Schools for Students with Special Needs. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 28(2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.24252/LP.2025V28N2I2
Humaira, & Ansor. (2026). Penilaian Proses dan Hasil Belajar PAI Kurikulum Merdeka Berbasis Taksonomi Bloom Revisi (2024). Malewa: Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 4(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.61683/JOME.V4I1.295
Jaya, M. T., Rafin, M., Nurrohman, M. M., & Ghofur, A. A. (2025). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN PAI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL TAKSONOMI BLOOM. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN KEGURUAN, 3(1), 106–113. https://jutepe-joln.net/index.php/JURPERU/article/view/817
Kartini, N. E., Nurdin, E. S., Hakam, K. A., & Syihabuddin, S. (2022). Telaah Revisi Teori Domain Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom dan Keterkaitannya dalam Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 7292–7302. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3478
Khansya Asyafa, M., Naofal, A., Nugraha, E., Tarbiyah, F., Keguruan, D., Islam, U., Sultan, N., & Hasanuddin Banten, M. (2025). Implementation of Bloom’s Taxonomy in the preparation of Islamic Religious Education Learning Evaluations. TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 4(8), 4754–4764. https://doi.org/10.61445/TOFEDU.V4I8.1118
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision Of Bloom’s Taxonomy Of Educational ObKrathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision Of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Theory into Practice, 41, 302. http://www.citeulike.org/user/mapto/article/961573%5Cnhttp://www.mendeley.com/research/a-taxonomy-for-learning-teaching-and-assessing-a-revision-of-blooms-taxonomy-of-educational-objectives-abridged-edition-1/%5Cnhttp://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Mahrus, M., & Sugeng, S. (2025). Asesmen Berbasis Nilai Islami Sebagai Strategi Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Yang Berkarakter. Instruktur, 5(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.51192/INSTRUKTUR.V5I1.2365
Miftahul, T., Syahidah, B., Pratiwi, N., Zuhri, S., Hidayat, W., Miftahul, T., Syahidah, B., Pratiwi, N., Zuhri, S., & Hidayat, W. (2024). IDENTIFIKASI HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILLS (HOTS) PADA SOAL ASESMEN SUMATIF AKHIR SEMESTER MATA PELAJARAN PAI DAN BUDI PEKERTI DI TINGKAT SMA. Seroja : Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(3), 130–139. https://jurnal.anfa.co.id/index.php/seroja/article/view/2468
Mohd, R. F., Zulkifli, H., Asiah, N., & Muhamad, F. (2023). The Need for Cognitive Domain in Islamic Education Subjects. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i4/19434
Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/HUM.V21I2.29252
Nirmala, Z., Remiswal, & Khadijah. (2024a). Analisis Soal Asesmen Sumatif Pembelajaran Fiqih Ditinjau Berdasarkan Tipe HOTS Menggunakan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 14(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.23887/JPEPI.V14I1.3709
Nirmala, Z., Remiswal, & Khadijah. (2024b). Analisis Soal Asesmen Sumatif Pembelajaran Fiqih Ditinjau Berdasarkan Tipe Hots Menggunakan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 14(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.23887/JPEPI.V14I1.3709
Putra, R. P. (2024). OBJEK EVALUASI HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM ANALISIS TAKSONOMI BLOOM (KOGNITIF, AFEKTIF, PSIKOMOTORIK) | Edu Global : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. Edu Global: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 18–26. https://jurnal.stain-madina.ac.id/index.php/eduglobal/article/view/1590
Putra, R. P., Yaqin, M. A., & Saputra, A. (2024). Objek Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam: Analisis Taksonomi Bloom (Kognitif, Afektif, Psikomotorik). AL-KARIM: Journal of Islamic and Educational Research, 2(1), 149–158. https://journal.institercom-edu.org/index.php/alkarim/article/view/236
Ramadhani, N. R., Rohmatunni`mah, Yuliani, R. D., Hafizh, R. T., & Hanif, M. (2026). ANALISIS RELEVANSI TEORI TAKSONOMI BLOOM DALAM TUJUAN PEMBELAJARAN PAI FASE F. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(02), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.23969/JP.V11I02.52506
Zulkifli, H., Ismail, A. M., Muhamad, N. A. F., Hussin, N. H., & Zamri, H. Z. (2025). Challenges in teaching Islamic education and requirements of the development of Islamic cognitive domains. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 14(5), 3534–3545. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i5.33565
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yusron Nur Hadi, Nurul Laely Mahmudah, Shodiq Abdullah, Agus Sutiyono, Karnadi Hasan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies agree to the following terms:
- Authors have retained full articles copyright and grant the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see also deposit policy and archiving on page journal).





