Weight Deductions in Smallholder Rubber Transactions in Talang Jembatan: A Sharia Economic Law Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/jiis.v6i1.12791Keywords:
weight deduction, rubber trade, gharar, 'urf, Sharia economic lawAbstract
Weight deductions are a routine part of smallholder rubber trading, yet the way collectors reduce the measured weight is rarely examined from the standpoint of Islamic commercial law. This study examines how weight deductions are determined and communicated in rubber transactions in Talang Jembatan Village, Abung Kunang District, North Lampung Regency, and assesses the practice under Sharia economic law. It is qualitative field research using an empirical (socio-legal) approach. Data were collected in 2025 through semi-structured interviews with four rubber farmers and two collectors, analysed thematically, compared across the two groups, and tested against the criteria of gharar, mutual consent ('an tarāḍin), and valid custom ('urf ṣaḥīḥ). The findings show that weighing takes place in front of the farmers, so the gross weight is open, but the deduction, commonly around 10 percent and ranging from 5 to 25 percent, is set by the collector through visual estimation of water content and impurities without any measuring device. Farmers are told the reason for the deduction but not how it is calculated, and they learn its amount only after weighing. Farmers also acknowledged that their rubber sometimes contains dirt. The study concludes that a deduction reflecting actual moisture and contaminant content is not prohibited, because it adjusts the measured weight to the real quantity of rubber sold. However, because the rate is fixed unilaterally, cannot be verified, and is disclosed only after weighing, it creates contractual uncertainty (gharar) beyond the tolerable level and weakens informed consent. Announcing the deduction rate and its basis before weighing, recording gross and net weights, and agreeing on a simple moisture check would bring the practice into line with Sharia economic law.
References
Al-Saati, A. R. (2003). The permissible gharar (risk) in classical Islamic jurisprudence. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 16(2), 3–19.
Aziz, M. A., Athoillah, M. A., & Awaludin, L. (2025). Thematic analysis of the hadith innamā al-bay' 'an tarāḍin on vending machine transactions within the framework of hadith al-aḥkām. Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 10(1), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v10i1.52963
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik karet Indonesia 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Fatimah, N., Kamaruddin, K., & Supriadi, S. (2025). Gharar in sharia financial products: Forms, implications, and prevention measures. AHKAM, 4(3), 809–820. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v4i3.6702
Kopp, T., & Brümmer, B. (2017). Traders' market power along Indonesian rubber value chains. China Agricultural Economic Review, 9(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-07-2015-0080
Kopp, T., & Sexton, R. J. (2021). Farmers, traders, and processors: Buyer market power and double marginalization in Indonesia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103(2), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12149
Kuznetsova, A., & Tenberga, I. (2022). Purchase and sale and prohibition of uncertainty (gharar) in the Islamic tradition. Pravovedenie, 66(2), 162–192. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2022.203
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.
Menteri Pertanian Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor 38/Permentan/OT.140/8/2008 tentang Pedoman Pengolahan dan Pemasaran Bahan Olah Karet (Bokar).
Ritonga, M., Hasibuan, Z. E., & Siregar, S. (2022). Praktik jual beli getah karet. El-Thawalib, 3(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v3i1.5082
Rosdiana, & Sayuti, A. R. (2023). Praktik potongan timbangan jual beli karet di Desa Petanang Kecamatan Kumpeh Kabupaten Muaro Jambi ditinjau dari perspektif hukum Islam. Wasatiyah: Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.70338/wasatiyah.v3i2.117
Saprida, S. (2017). Tinjauan fiqh muamalah terhadap timbangan jual beli karet di Desa Betung Kecamatan Lubuk Keliat Kabupaten Ogan Ilir. Islamic Banking: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Perbankan Syariah, 3(1), 11–26.
Sudarto, A., & Imtihanah, A. N. (2025). Relevansi 'urf terhadap adat jual beli singkong pada masyarakat Muslim Lampung. El Hisbah, 5(1), 98–109.
Tarly, M., & Nasution, A. I. (2024). Implementasi etika bisnis Islam dalam proses jual beli buah sawit: Studi kasus kalangan petani dan toke di Desa Sungai Mentawa Kabupaten Lamandau. El-Iqtishod: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 8(2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.70136/el-iqtishod.v8i2.488
Umar, Z., Mukharrom, M., & Putri, L. (2025). Tinjauan hukum Islam terhadap pelaksanaan jual beli buah di Jorong Talago Laweh Nagari Sulit Air Solok Sumatera Barat. Al Barakat: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.59270/jab.v5i2.310
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agif Adam Malik, Muhammad Zaki, Herlina Kurniati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies agree to the following terms:
- Authors have retained full articles copyright and grant the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see also deposit policy and archiving on page journal).




