PILIHAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH: KONSEP MELALUI LITIGASI Dan NON LITIGASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/alw.v6i2.1794Keywords:
Disputes, Economics, Sharia, Litigation, NonlitigationAbstract
This study aims to reveal the comparative norms of sharia economic dispute resolution through litigation and non-litigation, both in terms of settlement time, costs, procedures, settlement institutions, enforcement of rights, and justice.research (Library Library Research Research) Thisuses documentation data collection techniques with data analysis, namely comparative analysis. The results showed that both litigation and non-litigation attempt to apply legal justice in resolving cases. While the differences exist in terms of the relatively long settlement time through litigation, the cost of cases through litigation is relatively expensive, procedures through formal litigation while informal non-litigation, there is only one litigation settlement institution, namely the court, while non-litigation has more variations in deliberation, consultation, mediation, conciliation or assessment of experts and arbitrator, litigation is the enforcement of rights, while non-litigation is not, and through litigation feels less justice, while non-litigation prioritizes the agreement of both parties.
References
Ah. Azharuddin Lathif dan Diana Mutia Habibaty. “Disparitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Jalur Litigasi Pada Polis Asuransi Syariah Dan Putusan Pengadilan.†Αγαη 8, no. 5 (2019): 55.
Al-Hakim, Atang Abd Hakim Sofyan. “kerangka penyelesaian sengketa bisnis syariah Atang Abd Hakim Sofyan Al-Hakim Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum UIN Bandung,†2004, 33–49.
Azma, Ummi. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Bekasi.†Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat 17, no. 2 (2018): 219–34. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v17i2.1845.
Hakim, Ikhsan Al. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama.†Pandecta: Research Law Journal 9, no. 2 (2014): 273. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v9i2.3580.
Hariyanto, Erie. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia.†IQTISHADIA: Jurnal Ekonomi & Perbankan Syariah 1, no. 1 (2014): 42. https://doi.org/10.19105/iqtishadia.v1i1.365.
Indriati Amarini. “penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif dan efisien melalui optimalisasi mediasi di pengadilan.†Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 110, no. 9 (2017): 1689–99.
Komarudin, Parman. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Jalur Non Ligitasi.†Ekonomi Syariah Dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Volume 1 N (2014): 87–105. https://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/index.php/IQT/article/view/138.
Mukaromah, Lisa Aminatul. “Penyelesaian Perkara Ekonomi Syariah Dengan Gugatan Acara Sederhana Dan Acara Biasa Di Indonesia (Studi Komparasi Antara Perma Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 Dengan Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 )†7, no. 1 (2018): 109–24.
Mukarromah, Safitri. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syari ’ Ah Di Lembaga Keuangan Syari ’ Ah Kabupaten Banyumas.†Jurnal ISLAMADINA Vol 20, no. 1 (2019).
Rinanda, Riski Riski. “Penyelsaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasioanl (BASYARNAS).†Pactum Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2018): 145–54.
