KEDUDUKAN BANK SEBAGAI KREDITOR SEPARATIS DALAM PENGURUSAN DAN PEMBERESAN HARTA PAILIT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/alw.v3i1.200Keywords:
Bank, Secured Creditor, Bankruptcy SettlementAbstract
There are two purpose of this research 1) to know and analyze bank’s role as secured creditor in executing collaterals. This is cause by the uncertainty of the execution rights as a result of the inconsistencies of regulations mention to Article 55, Article 56 and Article 59 of The Republic of Indonesia Number 37 of 2004 regarding Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment Obligation. 2) to know and examine the legal protection for secure banks in bankruptcy settlement. This research is a normative legal research that is supported by interview. Secondary data is taken from primary, secondary and tertiary legal resource. Data collection method is documentary study and library research. Data analysis is a qualitative analysis.
Based on the result and discussion, bank as a secured creditor has the right to execute collateral that is pledged by debtor, as if bankruptcy does not take place (pursuant to Article 55 paragraph 1)The bankruptcy law has ruled the creditor’s right on the collateral, but there is uncertainty of execution right. This is caused by the inconsistency of regulations of Article 55, Article 56 and Article 59 of The Republic of Indonesia Number 37 of 2004 regarding Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment Obligation. Article 56 and Article 59 are limit the creditor’s rights. The current law does not strongly enforced, thus the bank is seeking right by auction or hidden transactionReferences
Anisah, Siti, 2008, Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia, Total Media, Yogyakarta.
Fuady, Munir, 2005, Hukum Pailit dalam teori dan praktek, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Hasbullah, Frieda Husni, 2009, Hukum Kebendaan Perdata Hak-Hak Yang Memberi Jaminan, Indo Hill-Co, Jakarta.
Hermasyah, 2008, Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia, Prenada Media Group.
Manan, Bagir, 2001, Mengenal Perpu Kepailitan, Penyelesaian Utang-Piutang, Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Alumni, Bandung.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2005, Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Mulyadi, Kartini, 2005, Kreditor Preferen dan Kreditor Separatis dalam Kepailitan, Pusat Pengkajian Hukum, Jakarta.
Nating, Imran, 2004, Peranan dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Puspa, Yan Pramadya, 2009, Kamus Hukum Edisi Lengkap Bahasa Belanda, Indonesia, Inggris, Aneka Imu, Semarang.
Sastrawidjaja, H. Man S, 2010, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, PT. Alumni, Bandung.
Shubban, M. Hadi, 2008, Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma, dan praktik di Peradilan, Kencana Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.
Sianturi, Purnama Tioria,2013, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Barang Jaminan Tidak Bergerak Melalui Lelang, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy, 2009, Hukum Kepailitan; Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan, PT. Pustaka Utama Grafiti, Jakarta.
Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih, 2009, Hak Kreditor Separatis Dalam Mengeksekusi Benda Jaminan Debitor Pailit, Laksbang Pressindo, Yogyakarta.
Sutedi, Adrian, 2009, Hukum Kepailitan, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.
Wijayanta, Tata, 2016, Undang-Undang dan Praktik Kepailitan, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Yani, Ahmad dan Gunawan Widjaja, 2004, Seri Hukum Bisnis Kepailitan, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Sri Redjeki Slamet, Perlindungan Hukum Dan Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Dalam Hal Terjadi Kepailitan Terhadap Debitor, Forum Ilmiah, Volume 13, Nomor 1, Januari, 2016, hlm. 52-59
Anonim, 2016, Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Dalam Mengeksekusi Barang Jaminan, Wawancara, Ambon, 29 Agustus.
Anonim, 2016, Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Dalam Mengeksekusi Barang Jaminan, Wawancara, Ambon, 19 September.
Anonim, 2016, Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Dalam Mengeksekusi Barang Jaminan, Wawancara, Ambon, 29 September
