ISTINBATH AND TATHWIR TECHNIQUES IN CONSTRUCTIVISM-BASED MUHAWARAH LEARNING: A CASE STUDY OF THE RAMADHAN DAURAH INTENSIVE PROGRAM

Authors

  • Abdurrahman Ahmad Agil Universitas Islam Internasional Darullughah Wadda'wah, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/jale.v9i1.10159

Keywords:

Arabic language learning, muhawarah, istinbath, tathwir, constructivism

Abstract

Arabic language learning, particularly speaking skills, is still dominated by a memorization-based approach that does not support active language production. This study aims to analyze the implementation of istinbath (inductive) and tathwir (creative development) techniques in muhawarah learning and explain the process from a constructivist perspective. This research used a qualitative approach with a case study design in the intensive Daurah Ramadhan program. Data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The results show that learning occurs through three main stages: (1) istinbath as a process of constructing language knowledge through inductive pattern discovery, (2) tathwir as a mechanism for developing speaking skills through modification and expansion of expressions, and (3) dialogic classroom interactions as a scaffolding-based learning ecosystem. The integration of these three aspects encourages the transformation of students’ language skills from passive to active. This study contributes by offering an Arabic language learning model based on the integration of inductive and productive techniques within a constructivist framework. This research is applicable in practice to provide a guideline to educators in creating more communicative and context-based learning.

References

Alfares, N. (2024). Does applying inductive methods based on system thinking improve EFL grammar learning? Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 4, 339. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-07-2024-0032

Atkinson, D., Mejía-Laguna, J., Ribeiro, A. C., Cappellini, M., Kayi-Aydar, H., & Lowie, W. (2025). Relationality, interconnectedness, and identity: A process-focused approach to second language acquisition and teaching (SLA/T). The Modern Language Journal, 109(S1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12982

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2015). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

Gerakopoulou, O. (2011). Scaffolding oral interaction in a CLIL context: A qualitative study. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/46311

Holovko, О. (2023). THE ROLE OF SOME COMMUNICATIVE METHODS IN DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ FOREIGN LANGUAGE GRAMMATICAL COMPETENCE. Humanities Science Current Issues, 1(66), 226–229. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/66-1-36

Hue Nguyen, M. (2013). EFL Students’ Reflections on Peer Scaffolding in Making a Collaborative Oral Presentation. English Language Teaching, 6(4), p64. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n4p64

Ibrahim, K. A. A.-A., Cuba Carbajal, N., Zuta, M. E. C., & Bayat, S. (2023). Collaborative learning, scaffolding-based instruction, and self-assessment: Impacts on intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension, motivation, and anxiety. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00229-1

Karimi, M. N., & Ashkani, P. (2023). Situation-model representations of conflicting textual information in L2 readers: The effects of prior beliefs and L2 proficiency. Language Awareness, 32(2), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2091583

Krüger, M. (2023). Theory of Second Language Acquisition. In M. Krüger (Ed.), Media-Related Out-of-School Contact with English in Germany and Switzerland: Frequency, Forms and the Effect on Language Learning (pp. 51–93). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42408-4_4

Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. OUP Oxford.

Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557

Mahan, K. R. (2022). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE.

Motulsky, S. L. (2021). Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research? Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000215

Nguyen, C.-D. (2024). Scaffolding student engagement with written corrective feedback: Transforming feedback sessions into learning affordances. Language Teaching Research, 28(5), 1918–1939. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211040904

Ní Dhiorbháin, A. (2023). A Sociocultural Rationale for an Explicit-Inductive Approach to Grammar Teaching in L2 Teacher Education. Teaching Education, 34(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2022.2118703

Sarmiento-Campos, N.-V., Lázaro-Guillermo, J. C., Silvera-Alarcón, E.-N., Cuellar-Quispe, S., Huamán-Romaní, Y.-L., Apaza, O. A., & Sorkheh, A. (2022). A Look at Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory (SCT): The Effectiveness of Scaffolding Method on EFL Learners’ Speaking Achievement. Education Research International, 2022, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3514892

Shahini, A. (2025). Constructivism in Language Learning. In A. Shahini (Ed.), Language Learning Theories: A Student’s Guide (pp. 41–63). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92210-7_4

Tong, Z., An, F., & Cui, Y. (2024). Exploring teacher discourse patterns: Comparative insights from novice and expert teachers in junior high school EFL contexts. Heliyon, 10(16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36435

Zohrevandi, K., Ahmadi, H., & Khalaji, H. (2023). Improving EFL Learners Writing Accuracy and Fluency through Task-based Collaborative Output Activities and Scaffolding Techniques. Research in English Language Pedagogy, (Online First). https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2023.1988366.1468

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Ahmad Agil, A. (2026). ISTINBATH AND TATHWIR TECHNIQUES IN CONSTRUCTIVISM-BASED MUHAWARAH LEARNING: A CASE STUDY OF THE RAMADHAN DAURAH INTENSIVE PROGRAM. Al Ibrah: Journal of Arabic Language Education, 9(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.24256/jale.v9i1.10159

Citation Check