ISTINBATH AND TATHWIR TECHNIQUES IN CONSTRUCTIVISM-BASED MUHAWARAH LEARNING: A CASE STUDY OF THE RAMADHAN DAURAH INTENSIVE PROGRAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/jale.v9i1.10159Keywords:
Arabic language learning, muhawarah, istinbath, tathwir, constructivismAbstract
Arabic language learning, particularly speaking skills, is still dominated by a memorization-based approach that does not support active language production. This study aims to analyze the implementation of istinbath (inductive) and tathwir (creative development) techniques in muhawarah learning and explain the process from a constructivist perspective. This research used a qualitative approach with a case study design in the intensive Daurah Ramadhan program. Data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The results show that learning occurs through three main stages: (1) istinbath as a process of constructing language knowledge through inductive pattern discovery, (2) tathwir as a mechanism for developing speaking skills through modification and expansion of expressions, and (3) dialogic classroom interactions as a scaffolding-based learning ecosystem. The integration of these three aspects encourages the transformation of students’ language skills from passive to active. This study contributes by offering an Arabic language learning model based on the integration of inductive and productive techniques within a constructivist framework. This research is applicable in practice to provide a guideline to educators in creating more communicative and context-based learning.
References
Alfares, N. (2024). Does applying inductive methods based on system thinking improve EFL grammar learning? Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 4, 339. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-07-2024-0032
Atkinson, D., Mejía-Laguna, J., Ribeiro, A. C., Cappellini, M., Kayi-Aydar, H., & Lowie, W. (2025). Relationality, interconnectedness, and identity: A process-focused approach to second language acquisition and teaching (SLA/T). The Modern Language Journal, 109(S1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12982
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2015). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Gerakopoulou, O. (2011). Scaffolding oral interaction in a CLIL context: A qualitative study. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/46311
Holovko, О. (2023). THE ROLE OF SOME COMMUNICATIVE METHODS IN DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ FOREIGN LANGUAGE GRAMMATICAL COMPETENCE. Humanities Science Current Issues, 1(66), 226–229. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/66-1-36
Hue Nguyen, M. (2013). EFL Students’ Reflections on Peer Scaffolding in Making a Collaborative Oral Presentation. English Language Teaching, 6(4), p64. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n4p64
Ibrahim, K. A. A.-A., Cuba Carbajal, N., Zuta, M. E. C., & Bayat, S. (2023). Collaborative learning, scaffolding-based instruction, and self-assessment: Impacts on intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension, motivation, and anxiety. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00229-1
Karimi, M. N., & Ashkani, P. (2023). Situation-model representations of conflicting textual information in L2 readers: The effects of prior beliefs and L2 proficiency. Language Awareness, 32(2), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2091583
Krüger, M. (2023). Theory of Second Language Acquisition. In M. Krüger (Ed.), Media-Related Out-of-School Contact with English in Germany and Switzerland: Frequency, Forms and the Effect on Language Learning (pp. 51–93). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42408-4_4
Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. OUP Oxford.
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
Mahan, K. R. (2022). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE.
Motulsky, S. L. (2021). Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research? Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000215
Nguyen, C.-D. (2024). Scaffolding student engagement with written corrective feedback: Transforming feedback sessions into learning affordances. Language Teaching Research, 28(5), 1918–1939. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211040904
Ní Dhiorbháin, A. (2023). A Sociocultural Rationale for an Explicit-Inductive Approach to Grammar Teaching in L2 Teacher Education. Teaching Education, 34(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2022.2118703
Sarmiento-Campos, N.-V., Lázaro-Guillermo, J. C., Silvera-Alarcón, E.-N., Cuellar-Quispe, S., Huamán-Romaní, Y.-L., Apaza, O. A., & Sorkheh, A. (2022). A Look at Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory (SCT): The Effectiveness of Scaffolding Method on EFL Learners’ Speaking Achievement. Education Research International, 2022, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3514892
Shahini, A. (2025). Constructivism in Language Learning. In A. Shahini (Ed.), Language Learning Theories: A Student’s Guide (pp. 41–63). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92210-7_4
Tong, Z., An, F., & Cui, Y. (2024). Exploring teacher discourse patterns: Comparative insights from novice and expert teachers in junior high school EFL contexts. Heliyon, 10(16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36435
Zohrevandi, K., Ahmadi, H., & Khalaji, H. (2023). Improving EFL Learners Writing Accuracy and Fluency through Task-based Collaborative Output Activities and Scaffolding Techniques. Research in English Language Pedagogy, (Online First). https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2023.1988366.1468
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdurrahman Ahmad Agil

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

