The Pro Bono Legal Aid in Religious Courts and the Constitutional Right to Equality Before the Law: Toward Collective Accountability of Law Enforcement Officers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/jiis.v5i1.11344Keywords:
pro bono legal aid, equality before the law, Religious Courts, access to justice, collective responsibilityAbstract
Access to justice in Indonesia’s Religious Courts remains structurally constrained, particularly for low-income litigants who frequently navigate divorce, child custody, and inheritance disputes without adequate legal representation. Despite a comprehensive normative framework grounded in Articles 27(1) and 28D (1) of the 1945 Constitution, Law Number 16 of 2011 on Legal Aid, Law Number 50 of 2009 on Religious Courts, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2014 concerning Legal Aid Posts (Posbakum), the substantive realization of the constitutional right to equality before the law remains limited in practice. This study examines the constitutional urgency of pro bono legal aid provision in Religious Courts and analyzes how the collective responsibility of law enforcement officers should be conceptualized to ensure its effective implementation. This study employed a normative juridical method using statute and conceptual approaches, supported by primary legal materials, regulatory documents, and scholarly literature. The findings reveal three main points. First, pro bono legal aid constitutes a constitutional obligation rather than a discretionary service, as substantive equality before the law requires the removal of economic, geographic, and informational barriers to justice. Second, the implementation gap in Religious Courts is primarily caused by fragmented institutional responsibility, limited budget allocation, uneven distribution of accredited legal aid institutions, and weak accountability mechanisms. Third, effective legal aid provision requires an integrated collective responsibility framework involving judges, advocates, legal aid institutions, and court registrars as interdependent actors in ensuring access to justice. This study contributes to the literature by reframing pro bono legal aid in Religious Courts as a constitutionally mandated collective responsibility essential to fulfilling equality before the law.
References
Alfitri, A. (2012). Legal reform project, access to justice and gender equity in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 9(2), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol9.2.348
Azifah, C. (2021). Pro bono legal aid by advocates: Guarantee of justice for the poor. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 3(4), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v3i4.48281
Bedner, A. (2010). An elementary approach to the rule of law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2(1), 48–74.
Budiarti, A. I., Arianto, G. N., Warneri, M. R., & Wicaksana, D. A. (2023). Kebutuhan anggaran bantuan hukum yang berperspektif kelompok rentan. Indonesia Judicial Research Society.
Caplan, L., & Liebman, L. (Eds.). (2019). Access to justice. American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Cappelletti, M., & Garth, B. (1978). Access to justice: A world survey. Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
Galanter, M. (1974). Why the “haves” come out ahead. Law and Society Review, 9(1), 95–160.
Huda, C. (2014). Analisis mekanisme layanan Pos Bantuan Hukum (Posbakum) di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 3(1), 1–10.
Iksan, M., Kurnianingsih, M., Kuntoro, C., & Sartanto, A. (2023). Urgensi Pos Bantuan Hukum dalam pemenuhan hak terdakwa. Risalah Hukum, 19, 21–31.
Jitmau, S., Naim, S., & Sj, M. A. (2025). Implementation of the principle of equality before the law in the dynamics of Indonesian law. Justisi, 11(2), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i2.4088
Lev, D. S. (2000). Legal evolution and political authority in Indonesia. Kluwer Law International.
Lindsey, T. (2012). Islam, law and the state in Southeast Asia. Journal of Islamic Studies, 23(2), 231–238.
Marzuki, I. (2024). The rule of law and the principle of equality before the law. Jurnal Idea Hukum, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2024.10.1.495
Mauro Cappelletti. (1994). Access to justice and welfare state policies. International Journal of Sociology of Law, 22(1), 1–17.
Muflikh, A. A. M. (2025). Bantuan hukum pro bono sebagai pilar strategis dalam penegakan HAM. Madani Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 91–99.
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2001). Law and society in transition. Transaction Publishers.
Putra, I. K. E. C., Dewi, A. A. S., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2022). Implementasi Pos Bantuan Hukum di PTUN Denpasar. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 4(1), 55–61.
Putri, H. R. (2022). Implementation of free legal aid (pro bono) for the poor in Indonesia. The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence, 3(2), 173–202. https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v3i2.66012
Salam, S., Suhartono, R., Karim, L., Anisa, S., & Mayanti, S. (2022). Legal assistance through legal aid postal service at Religious Court. Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum, 2(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.22219/jdh.v2i2.22914
Simanjuntak, T. E., Situmeang, J. O. M., Riyadi, A. P., & Sipayung, N. H. (2025). Envisioning inclusive justice. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(6), 4215–4226.
Siska, D., Rosadi, O., & Mulyawan, F. (2025). Penyelenggaraan bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma bagi masyarakat miskin. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 9(3), 520–528. https://doi.org/10.31933/21k9gz68
Sumner, C., & Lindsey, T. (2011). Courting reform: Indonesia’s Islamic courts and justice for the poor. International Journal for Court Administration, 4(1), 1–14.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
Ulva, Y., Arif, M. F., & Luthfi, A. (2022). Peran Pos Bantuan Hukum dalam layanan bantuan hukum di Pengadilan Agama. Siyasah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 5(2), 33–54.
Wahyuningsih, S. E., Casum, & Mashdurohatun, A. (2023). Reconstruction of provision regulations on legal assistance for poor communities. International Journal of Current Science, 13(1), 888–897.
World Bank. (2012). Striving for justice: Expansion of legal aid program for the poor in Indonesia.
Zubaidah, S. (2020). Access to justice in religious courts and legal aid in Indonesia. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 20(2), 201–220.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nikyta Tsabita Khansa, Syaghaf Muhammad Sa’ad, Maulana Iqbal, Musleh Harry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies agree to the following terms:
- Authors have retained full articles copyright and grant the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see also deposit policy and archiving on page journal).
