Transformation of Hadits Transmission in The Tadwin Era: Epistemological Analysis and Its Implications on Hadits Studies

Muhammad Rijal Mushthofa; Muhid

doi:10.24256/jiis.v6i1.11655

Authors

Muhammad Rijal Mushthofa UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
Muhid UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/jiis.v6i1.11655

Keywords:

hadits tadwin, transmission methodology, hadits epistemology

Abstract

This study analyzes the transformation of hadits transmission methodology during the tadwin (systematic codification) era and its implications for hadits studies. The focus includes changes in verification mechanisms from the pre-tadwin period to the tadwin era, as well as their impact on the epistemological framework. Using a qualitative library research approach, the study examines classical sources and relevant academic literature. The findings reveal that the tadwin era marked not only the codification of hadits but also a fundamental transformation in transmission verification. In the pre-tadwin period, transmission largely depended on memorization and personal authority of narrators. In contrast, the tadwin era introduced a more structured approach through the central role of isnad, standardization of transmission practices, and application of hadits criticism. This development led to the emergence of key methodological tools such as ‘ilm rijal al-hadits and al-jarh wa al-ta‘dil, which enable objective assessment of narrators and transmitted reports. Furthermore, these methodological changes contributed to the formation of an epistemological structure grounded in verification, objectivity, and accountability. The principles of tahqiq and tabayyun demonstrate the relevance of hadits methodology in addressing contemporary challenges, particularly the spread of disinformation in the digital era. Academically, this study contributes to the discourse on hadith studies by providing a comprehensive analysis of the methodological transformation during the tadwin era and highlighting its significance for the development of contemporary epistemological approaches to hadith scholarship.

References

ʿItr, N. al-D. (1981). Manhaj al-naqd fī ʿulūm al-ḥadīth. Dār al-Fikr.

Al Faruq, U., Kirana, A. C., Salma, W. A., & Arifin, I. B. (2024). Eksplorasi fenomena tasyri’ dalam periode tadwin dan kodifikasi: Tinjauan historis terhadap periode tadwin dalam hukum Islam. Relinesia: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Multikulturalisme Indonesia, 3(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.572349/relinesia.v3i2.1893

Al-Fasawī, Y. ibn S. (1981). Al-maʿrifah wa al-tārīkh. Muʾassasat al-Risālah.

Al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī, A. ibn ʿA. (1996). Al-jāmiʿ li akhlāq al-rāwī wa ādāb al-sāmiʿ. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Al-Khatib, M. ʿA. (1980). Al-sunnah qabla al-tadwīn. Dār al-Fikr.

Al-Zahrani, M. M. (1996). Tadwīn al-sunnah al-nabawiyyah. Dār al-Hijrah.

Ali, M. (2019). Kajian sanad. Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis, 6(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.24252/tahdis.v6i2.7177

Bistara, R. (2020). Perkembangan ilmu Hadis periode keempat dan kelima. KACA, 10(1), 76–86.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brown, J. A. C. (2008). How we know early ḥadīth critics did matn criticism and why it’s so hard to find. Islamic Law and Society, 15(2), 143–184. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851908X290574

Brown, J. A. C. (2012). The rules of matn criticism: There are no rules. Islamic Law and Society, 19(4), 356–396. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851912X639923

Brown, J. A. C. (2017). Hadith: Muhammad’s legacy in the medieval and modern world (2nd ed.). Oneworld.

Dainori. (2020). Kodifikasi Hadith secara resmi: Hadits pada masa Tabi’i al-Tabi’in. Jurnal Keislaman Terateks, 5(1), 1–7.

Dickinson, E. (2001). The development of early Sunnite Hadith criticism: The Taqdima of Ibn Abī Ḥātim al-Rāzī. Brill.

Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr. (1994). Jāmiʿ bayān al-ʿilm wa faḍlih. Dār Ibn al-Jawzī.

Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī. (1984). Al-nukat ʿalā kitāb Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ. Islamic University of Madinah.

Junaid, M., Nasruddin, A., & Ismail, M. (2024). Historitas perkembangan Hadis (dari periode klasik hingga kontemporer). Carita: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya, 2(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.35905/carita.v2i2.7135

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Al-Qur’an dan terjemahannya. Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an.

Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018

Lucas, S. C. (2004). Constructive critics, Ḥadīth literature, and the articulation of Sunnī Islam: The legacy of the generation of Ibn Saʿd, Ibn Maʿīn, and Ibn Ḥanbal. Brill.

Malik ibn Anas. (2004). Al-Muwaṭṭaʾ: Riwayat Yaḥyā ibn Yaḥyā al-Laythī. Muʾassasat Zāyid ibn Sulṭān Āl Nahyān.

Motzki, H. (1991). The Muṣannaf of ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Ṣanʿānī as a source of authentic aḥādīth of the first century A.H. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 50(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/373461

Motzki, H., Boekhoff-van der Voort, N., & Anthony, S. W. (Eds.). (2010). Analysing Muslim traditions: Studies in legal, exegetical and maghāzī Hadith. Brill.

Musaddad, E. (2021). Ulumul Hadis. Media Madani.

Nizar, M. (2019). Tadwin al-Hadith: Kontribusinya sebagai penyempurna hukum Islam kedua. Jurnal Al-Tsiqoh, 4(1), 18–30.

Setyaningsih, N. R. C., & Imawan, D. H. (2025). Kodifikasi Hadis sebagai fondasi hukum Islam pada era Umar bin Abdul Aziz, Daulah Umayyah di Damaskus 717–720 M. Batuthah: Jurnal Sejarah Peradaban Islam, 4(2), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.38073/batuthah.v4i2.3331

Schoeler, G. (2006). The oral and the written in early Islam (U. Vagelpohl, Trans.; J. E. Montgomery, Ed.). Routledge.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Tufail, M. N. F., Asrullah, M., Palangkey, R. D., & Miro, A. B. (2023). Teknik periwayatan Hadits. Iqra: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 96–107.

Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020). Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: Using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication, 37(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1716500

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe.

Yuslem, N. (2001). Ulumul Hadis. Mutiara Sumber Widya.

Zagzebski, L. T. (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174763

Zagzebski, L. T. (2012). Epistemic authority: A theory of trust, authority, and autonomy in belief. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936472.001.0001