Principals' Digital Leadership in Developing a Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI)-Based Learning Ecosystem in Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/pijies.v9i2.11071Keywords:
Academic Honesty, Digital Leadership, Enabling Leadership, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Learning EcosystemAbstract
The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) in the Society 5.0 era has brought significant disruption to the global education landscape. At the elementary school level, institutional leaders often face gaps in official regulations that trigger restrictive rather than enabling policies. This study aims to analyze the role and digital leadership strategies of elementary school principals, identify systemic challenges and emerging supporting factors, and develop a conceptual framework for developing a safe, ethical, and innovative Gen-AI-based learning ecosystem. Using a descriptive qualitative approach with a single case study design, data collection was conducted at BINUS SCHOOL Semarang through triangulation techniques that included in-depth interviews with eight key informants (consisting of the principal, technology coordinator, four class teachers, and two parent representatives), passive participant observation, and analysis of formal school documents. The study results indicate that the digital leadership implemented in this school displays an adaptive profile (Enabling Leadership) through synchronization of the institution's vision, provision of ICT infrastructure based on content filtering, facilitation of digital pedagogical competency training, and regular updates to academic honesty guidelines. Furthermore, interactions within this ecosystem have resulted in the "BINUS Digital-Pedagogical Framework" model, which seeks to balance strategic alignment, streamline teacher administrative workloads (professional co-piloting), and limit the use of AI during the initial ideation stage (cognitive encapsulation) to protect students' original critical thinking. These findings are contextual to the characteristics of the schools studied. As a practical recommendation, elementary school principals can gradually adapt the principles of this framework through redesigning conceptual assessment tasks (AI-Resistant Tasks) and developing local SOPs with school committees to build a relevant and ethical digital citizenship curriculum.
References
Ahmad, S. (2025). Digital leadership in secondary education: Opportunities and challenges of AI integration. International Journal of Educational Management, 39(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM.
Chiu, T. K. F. (2026). Digital leadership and teacher readiness for artificial intelligence in primary schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 74(2), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423.
Fitriani, A. (2025). Adopsi mandiri generative AI oleh guru sekolah dasar: Studi kasus fenomena "underground AI usage". Jurnal Elemen Pendidikan Dasar, 11(1), 78–92.
Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Handayani, T., & Purwanto, A. (2025). Analisis kesiapan guru sekolah dasar dalam memanfaatkan ChatGPT untuk penyusunan modul ajar Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Basicedu, 9(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.
Hidayat, R., & Utami, P. (2023). Kesiapan kepemimpinan digital kepala sekolah dalam manajemen berbasis sekolah di era digital. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.
Holmes, W. (2023). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(3), 501–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593.
Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2025). Restrictive vs. enabling digital leadership: How school principals respond to generative AI. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.
Lestari, S. (2024). Tantangan etis penggunaan artificial intelligence di sekolah dasar: Perspektif kepala sekolah dan guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 9(2), 201–215.
Livingstone, S., & Stoilova, M. (2021). Children’s rights in the digital environment: A critical review. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2751–2768. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211008073.
Luckin, R. (2024). AI in education: Shaping the future of learning. Routledge.
Luckin, R. (2025). Ethical AI for the next generation: Reimagining classrooms. Oxford University Press.
Moleong L. J. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyasa, E. (2023). Manajemen dan kepemimpinan kepala sekolah abad 21. Bumi Aksara.
Ng, D. T. K. (2024). Generative AI in primary education: School teachers' perceptions and initial practices. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.
Pratama, M. R., & Wijaya, A. (2024). Kompetensi kepemimpinan digital kepala sekolah dalam menghadapi disrupsi teknologi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 8(2), 189–204.
Rahmah, S., & Santoso, B. (2024). Kesenjangan digital dan tantangan kepemimpinan konvensional di tingkat pendidikan dasar. Jurnal Management Pendidikan Indonesia, 16(3), 310–325.
Romero, M. (2024). Cognitive protection of primary school students in the age of generative AI: A pedagogical framework. Computers & Education, 210, 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.
Rusdiana, A. (2024). Kebijakan dan kepemimpinan pendidikan di era disrupsi digital. Pustaka Setia.
Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Senge, P. M. (2015). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
Sheninger, E. (2022). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.
Smith, J. (2024). Technological transformations in higher education: The role of digital leaders. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(2), 112–128. https://www.j-ets.net/.
Suryadi, E. (2024). Menanamkan berpikir kritis sejak dini: Peran pendidikan dasar dalam ekosistem digital masyarakat 5.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 10(1), 15–32.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing.
Wahyudi, I. (2025). Model kepemimpinan digital kepala sekolah dalam mengembangkan budaya inovasi TIK di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 13(1), 44–58.
Weng, C., & Chen, L. (2025). Policy lag and technological acceleration: School administrators’ dilemma in the age of generative AI. Educational Administration Quarterly, 61(2), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X.
Williamson, B. (2024). Digital pedagogies and the threat of technological determinism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.
World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs and learning report 2025. WEF Geneva.
Zawacki-Richter, O. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agustin Hanivia Cindy, Nur Rina Priyani Mirsa, Alpendi Alpendi, Achmad Sya’dulla, Kaidah Yunia Wati, Zhou Ruguang, Hamdan Said

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Copyright Retention & First Publication: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. (2) Post-Publication Distribution: Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. (3) Pre-print & Online Posting: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This is an open access article under the