Exploring Students’ Problem-Solving Skills Reviewed from Gender Perspective in Elementary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/pijies.v9i1.9456Keywords:
Elementary School, Gender Perspective, Mathematics Education, Problem-Solving Skill, StudentsAbstract
Mathematics education serves a fundamental role in developing students’ 21st-century competencies, particularly in fostering reasoning, communication, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. However, instructional practices in elementary schools still tend to emphasize routine and procedural tasks, resulting in students’ limited exposure to non-routine problems that require higher-order thinking strategies. This study aims to explore elementary school students’ mathematical problem-solving skills reviewed from gender perspective. A qualitative research approach was employed. The data were collected through problem-solving skill tests, observations, interviews, and documentation, and subsequently analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model. The findings indicate that students with high problem-solving skill are able to carry out problem-solving steps in a coherent and systematic manner, although reinforcement is still needed in terms of accuracy and verification. In contrast, students with low problem-solving skill experience difficulties at almost all stages of the problem-solving process. These difficulties are characterized by insufficient conceptual understanding, inability to organize information, lack of proficiency in performing mathematical operations, and the absence of habits related to checking calculation results. Both male and female students demonstrate adequate basic problem-solving abilities. However, female students exhibit more structured, systematic, and detail-oriented thinking processes at each stage. In contrast, male students tend to be less consistent in utilizing all available information, rely more heavily on visual approaches, and show less accuracy in verifying their solutions. These findings highlight the necessity of designing mathematics instruction that prioritizes the development of problem-solving skills while incorporating an awareness of gender-based variations in students’ cognitive processing.
References
Abimanyu, S. A., & Pratama, F. W. (2023). Analisis pemecahan masalah matematika pada mahasiswa calon guru dengan tipe kecerdasan linguistik dan logis-matematis. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 10(3), 673–683. https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v10i3.1716
Aufin, M. (2012). Komunikasi dan pemecahan masalah dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Psikologi, 1(2), 2.2-1–2.2-6.
Berutu, N. A., & Juliani, S. F. (2024). Implementasi teori Polya terhadap pemecahan masalah materi bilangan cacah pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 1753–1757. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v8i1.12644
Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM, 51(6), 955-965.
Cahya, A. R. H., Syamsuri, & Santosa, C. A. H. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan Polya ditinjau dari kemampuan representasi matematis. GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.30656/gauss.v5i1.4016
Diputra, K. S., Suarjana, I. M., & Japa, I. G. N. (2019). Investigating the mathematical literacy of primary school students in curriculum 2013. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 65–67.
Glock, S., & Kleen, H. (2017). Gender and student misbehavior: Evidence from implicit and explicit measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.015
Isna Aulia, L., & Murtiyasa, B. (2024). Analisis profil metakognisi siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematis ditinjau dari gender pada pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i2.2302
Juliarti, I., Susanto, H. A., & Astutiningtyas, E. L. (2024). Pemecahan masalah menurut teori Polya, Dewey, Krulick, dan Rudnick berdasarkan kecerdasan logis matematis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v15i2.189
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Silabus mata pelajaran sekolah dasar/madrasah ibtidaiyah (SD/MI). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kumar, R., Karabenick, S. A., & Burgoon, J. N. (2015). Teachers’ implicit attitudes, explicit beliefs, and the mediating role of respect and cultural responsibility on mastery and performance-focused instructional practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 533.
Lestanti, M. M. (2015). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari karakteristik cara berpikir siswa dalam model problem based learning.
Lubis, J. N., Panjaitan, A., Edi, S., & Syahputra, E. (2017). Analysis mathematical problem solving skills of student of the grade VIII-2 junior high school Bilah Hulu Labuhan Batu. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 4(2).
Malikah, S. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada barisan dan deret aritmetika berdasarkan teori Polya. Primatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.30872/primatika.v12i2.2579
Maulia Putri, M., & Andriani, P. (2023). Gender differences in mathematics learning: A study of problem solving errors based on Newmann error analysis. Journal of Math Tadris, 3(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.55099/jmt.v3i1.71
Nicolaidou, M., & Philippou, G. (2003). Attitudes towards mathematics, self-efficacy and achievement in problem solving. European research in mathematics education III, 1(11), 1-12.
Nufus, H., & Mursalin, M. (2020). Improving students' problem solving ability and mathematical communication through the application of problem based learning. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology, 1(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v1i1.8
Phonapichat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An analysis of elementary school students’ difficulties in mathematical problem solving. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 116, 3169-3174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.728
Piatak, J., & Mohr, Z. (2019). More gender bias in academia? Examining the influence of gender and formalization on student worker rule following. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.22.76
Reinhold, F., Hofer, S., Berkowitz, M., Strohmaier, A., Scheuerer, S., Loch, F., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Reiss, K. (2020). The role of spatial, verbal, numerical, and general reasoning abilities in complex word problem solving for young female and male adults. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00331-0
Riyadi, R., Syarifah, T. J., & Nikmaturrohmah, P. (2021). Profile of students’ problem-solving skills viewed from Polya's four-steps approach and elementary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1625-1638.
Riyanto, B. (2025). Bridging Mathematics and Communication: Implementing Realistic Mathematics Education Principles for Skill Development. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 729-752.
Rohid, N., & Rusmawati, R. D. (2019). Students' Mathematical Communication Skills (MCS) in Solving Mathematics Problems: A Case in Indonesian Context. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 19-30.
Saedi, M., Mokat, S., & Herianto, H. (2011). Teori pemecahan masalah Polya dalam pembelajaran matematika. SIGMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.26618/sigma.v3i1.7201
Schweinle, A., & Mims, G. A. (2009). Mathematics self-efficacy: Stereotype threat versus resilience. Social Psychology of Education, 12(4), 501-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-009-9094-2
Siregar, B. H., Turnip, L., Simanjuntak, R. A. P., Lubis, N. I., Tanjung, J. Y., Manurung, H. C., & Munthe, T. M. (2024). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam pemecahan masalah sistem persamaan dua variabel: Perspektif teori Polya. JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v4i4.946
Siswanti, R. E., & Khabibah, S. (2016). Penalaran siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari perbedaan jenis kelamin. MATHEdunesa, 2(5).
Soenarjadi, G. (2020). Profil pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri ditinjau dari perbedaan jenis kelamin dan gaya belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v3n2.p78-91
Stewart, S. (2023). Stereotype Threat: A Proposed Process Model on the Impact of Stereotype Threat on Self-Efficacy and Minority Performance.
Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability, 12(23), 10113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113
Trisniawati. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa tingkat sekolah dasar di Kotamadya Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi, 3(1).
Yuan, S. (2013). Incorporating Polya’s problem solving method in remedial math. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 3(1).
Yuniawatika. (2015). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. Dalam Proceeding Scientific Forum Faculty of Education Department of Science Education.
Zefania, D., Pangastuti, P. R., Novita, D., & Riswari, L. A. (2024). Efektivitas teori Polya dalam pemecahan masalah matematis kelas IV SD 4 Kaliwungu. Laplace: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31537/laplace.v7i2.2057
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Laely Farokhah, Dessy Norma Juita, Venna Puspita Sari, Muhammad Zulfadhli, Apit Dulyapit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
This is an open access article under the 