An Investor Protection in Cases of Sharia-Labeled Bogus Investments: A Study of Sharia Economic Law and Financial Services Authority

Authors

  • Aeky Rezkiah Fattah Mashuddin Sharia Economic Law, Sharia Faculty, Palopo State Islamic University, Indonesia
  • Meriska Sharia Economic Law, Sharia Faculty, Palopo State Islamic University, Indonesia

Keywords:

Legal Protection, Sharia Fraudulent Investment, Islamic Economic Law , Financial Services Authority (OJK)

Abstract

Purpose  –  This study aims to analyze the legal protection mechanisms for victims of bogus investments labeled as sharia from the perspective of Islamic Economic Law and to assess the effectiveness of regulations issued by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in preventing and addressing illegal investment practices. The novelty of this research lies in its cross-case comparative analysis including PT CSI, Dream for Freedom (D4F), Abu Tours, GTIS, First Travel, and Pandawa which demonstrates that sharia-labeled bogus investments are not random incidents but constitute a systematic pattern of deception exploiting sharia attributes, low literacy levels, and regulatory gaps. This comparative approach has rarely been applied in previous studies, thereby providing a deeper understanding of the structural nature of bogus investment schemes operating under a sharia label.

Method   This study employs a qualitative method with an empirical approach to provide an in-depth description of the legal protection mechanisms for victims of bogus investments labeled as sharia-based. Primary data were obtained through in-depth interviews with OJK officials, law enforcement officers, academics, and victims, while secondary data were collected through document analysis of relevant regulations. The data were analyzed to identify patterns of legal protection, the effectiveness of OJK’s supervisory framework.

Result The findings of the research indicate that bogus investments labeled as sharia-compliant fundamentally violate the principles of Islamic Economic Law because they contain elements of gharar (uncertainty), maysir (speculation), and tadlis (deception), while also exploiting the low level of financial and sharia literacy within society. The study also found that regulations and oversight by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) including education, literacy programs, legality verification, and enforcement through the Investment Alert Task Force have played a role in providing both preventive and repressive legal protection.

 Implication As a practical implication, the effectiveness of these protections remains limited by regulatory gaps, OJK’s restricted authority over illegal entities, and the increasing complexity of bogus schemes. In addition, interview results show that synergy between OJK, the police, and the Sharia Supervisory Board still needs to be strengthened to maximize the restoration of victims’ rights and prevent similar cases in the future.

References

Antonius, K., Bediona, A., Rafly, M., & Herliansyah, F. (2024). Analisis Teori Perlindungan Hukum Menurut Philipus M Hadjon Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pemberian Hukuman Kebiri Terhadap Pelaku Kejahatan Seksual. 2023, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx

Anwar, S., & Ali, A. M. H. (n.d.). ANNS-BASED EARLY WARNING SYSTEM FOR INDONESIAN ISLAMIC BANKS.

Ayu, C., Maharani, D., Faricha, S., Adkha, A., Rohmah, A., & Ariani, D. V. (2024). Jurnal PEDAMAS ( Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat ) Volume 2 , Nomor 3 , Mei 2024 ISSN : 2986-7819 COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT FOR OVERCOMING THE RISE OF ILLEGAL ONLINE Pendahuluan. 2, 855–867.

Dalam, P., & Bodong, I. (2017). Al-Amwal : Journal of Islamic Economic Law Maret 2017,Vol. 2 No. 1 https://ejournal.iainpalopo.ac.id/index.php/alamwal/index. 2(1), 85–95.

Fadlia, D. H., & . Y. (2015). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Ojk) Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Investor Atas Dugaan Investasi Fiktif. Law Reform, 11(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v11i2.15768

Gustiana, D., Pranata, E. O., & Fadhilah, N. (2025). Analisis Kebijakan Perlindungan Korban Penipuan Investasi Bodong Melalui Aplikasi XFA AI. 11(1), 18–33.

Huda, N., Salah, S., Syarat, S., Memperoleh, U., Magister, G., Magister, P., Hukum, I., & Jambi, U. B. (2020). YOPPY ARIANSYAH PROGRAM MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM. Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara, 2(1), 133–146.

Investasi, M., Bodong, I., Hukum, P.-P., & Syariah, E. (2025). Legal reasoning hakim dalam kasus penipuan dengan modus investasi ( investasi bodong ) berdasarkan prinsip- prinsip hukum ekonomi syariah (Issue 55).

Isnaini, S. (2024). Legal Protection of Sharia Investors in Indonesia : A Maqā ṣ id -Based Critique and Comparative Study of Malaysia ’ s System. 16(2).

Jamaluddin, F., Faisal, F., & Kahfi, M. A. (2023). Investasi Asing Dan Alih Teknologi. Veritas, 8(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v8i1.1749

Khasanah, U. (2022). Pengaturan Dan Peran Pengawasan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Screening Saham Pasar Modal Syariah. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 6(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.37253/jlpt.v6i2.4952

Kirana, K. M., Hukum, F., & Udayana, U. (2022). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENIPUAN INVESTASI ONLINE. 11(1).

Komunikasi, J., Perguruan, A., & Agama, T. (2024). 211| Kordinat |. XXIII(2), 211–222.

Kusnawirawan, I., Syarkani, Y., & Waluyo, I. (2025). Safeguarding Investor Rights : OJK ’ s Regulatory Framework Including Management and Challenges in Indonesia ’ s Capital Market. 4(3), 193–201.

Maningkas, P. S., & Dkk. (2025). Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Di Sektor Jasa Keuangan Ilegal Menurut. Lex Pravatum, 15(3).

Meri Yanti, Efni Anita, & Aztyara Ismadharliani. (2023). Persepsi Terhadap Investasi Sebagai Respon Kasus Investasi Bodong Pada Mahasiswa Febi Uin Sts Jambi. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Ekonomi Kreatif, 1(2), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.59024/jumek.v1i2.76

Natalia Lorien, T. (2022). HUKUM PIDANA Natalia Lorien , Tantimin e-Journal Komunikasi Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha imbalan kepada pengelola sesuai masyarakat lebih banyak melakukan. Ejournal.Undiksha.Ac.Id, 5(8), 356–366.

Natanael, L., Lauren, C. C., Kristina, D., & Ruchimat, T. (2021). Pengaturan Hukum Positif Indonesia Tentang Investasi Bodong (Forex Ilegal). Prosiding SENAPENMAS, 1119. https://doi.org/10.24912/psenapenmas.v0i0.15147

Nugraha, N. S., & Alfarizky, H. M. (2025). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan ( OJK ) Dalam Pengawasan Bank Digital Untuk Mencegah Praktik Investasi Ilegal. 3(2), 540–549.

Purwendah, E. K. (2020). Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Vol. 8 No. 1 (Februari, 2020). Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 8(1), 35–46.

Putri, A. J. (2025). Optimalisasi Regulasi dan Perlindungan Investor Terhadap Investasi Bodong di Pasar Modal Syariah. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Published by Yayasan Daarul Huda Krueng Mane, 2(6), 200–205.

Rahmadani, F., Prananingtyas, P., & Mahmudah, S. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Hal Terjadi Investasi Ilegal (Studi Kasus Pt Golden Traders Indonesia Syariah). Diponegoro Law Review, 5(2), 1–13.

Rahmadhani, F., & Arif, N. (2025). Audit Syariah Indonesia : Tinjauan atas Peluang dan Tantangan Perkembangan. 1(2), 144–150.

Regen, R., Bustami, A. W., Wahyu, W. D., & Novianto, W. (2025). Penyuluhan Investasi Bodong : Meningkatkan Kewaspadaan Masyarakat terhadap Penipuan Berkedok Investasi Di Kecamatan Siulak Kabupaten Kerinci. 05(01), 49–54.

Sadiawati, D., Dirkareshza, R., & Fauzan, M. (2023). Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Investasi Bodong: Studi Komparasi Indonesia dan Amerika Reconstruction of Legal Protection for Victims of Investment Fraud: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and America. 7(2), 179–197.

Setiawan, I., & Fitrianingsih, S. E. (2022). Urgensi dan Optimalisasi Peran Dewan Pengawas Syariah ( DPS ) dalam Aktivitas Pasar Modal Syariah di Indonesia Abstrak : Kata Kunci : Pendahuluan Ekonomi Islam atau ekonomi syariah dibangun atas dasar agama Islam karena ekonomi merupakan bagian yang tidak. 4(2), 196–212.

Sulaeman, A. H. A., Sw, O. F., & Mada, U. G. (2025). AL-AFKAR : Journal for Islamic Studies Perspektif Hukum Islam Terhadap Saham Syariah Di Pasar Modal Sebagai Alternatif Investasi Untuk Investor. 8(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i4.1805.Islamic

Suroadji, K. A. (2024). Praktik Skema Ponzi sebagai Investasi Bodong di Indonesia: Tinjauan Pustaka. Indonesian Scholar Journal of Business Economic & Management Science (ISJBEMS), 01(01), 21–26.

Syariah, F., Islam, U., & Raden, N. (2021). ANALISIS HUKUM ISLAM TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN QUICK RESPONSE INDONESIAN STANDARD DALAM QUICK RESPONSE INDONESIAN STANDARD DALAM.

Vaudina, N. (2025). Pengawasan Pemerintah Terhadap Investasi Bodong. 9(1), 105–121.

Yusri, A. Z. dan D. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Investor Dalam Pasar Modal. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 809–820.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-05

How to Cite

Mashuddin, A. R. F., & Meriska. (2025). An Investor Protection in Cases of Sharia-Labeled Bogus Investments: A Study of Sharia Economic Law and Financial Services Authority. Al-Amwal : Journal of Islamic Economic Law, 10(1), 80–96. Retrieved from https://ejournal.iainpalopo.ac.id/index.php/alamwal/article/view/8489

Citation Check