AL-AMWAL PEER REVIEW PROCESS

The Al-Amwal: Journal of Islamic Economic Law implements a rigorous peer review mechanism to uphold the scholarly quality and credibility of its published works. Employing a double-blind review model, the process safeguards the anonymity of both authors and reviewers. Manuscripts are evaluated by subject-matter experts based on their scientific contribution, originality, and alignment with the journal’s thematic scope.

1. Initial Screening
   Each submission undergoes a preliminary evaluation by the editorial team to determine its relevance to the journal’s focus and adherence to publication standards. Manuscripts exhibiting over 20% similarity with existing literature or failing to meet basic formatting and citation requirements are promptly rejected or returned for revision. Only those meeting the criteria advance to the peer review phase.
2. Reviewer Assignment
   The editorial board appoints a minimum of two independent reviewers with demonstrated expertise in the manuscript’s domain. To maintain objectivity, reviewers are selected from institutions other than those of the authors and are screened for potential conflicts of interest. The selection process aims to be completed within four weeks.
3. Manuscript Evaluation
   Reviewers critically assess the manuscript’s methodological soundness, novelty, and relevance to the field. Feedback is provided within approximately two weeks, including recommendations for acceptance, revision, or rejection, accompanied by constructive comments to guide the authors.
4. Editorial Decision-Making
   Based on reviewer input and conformity with editorial standards, the editor-in-chief determines the manuscript’s outcome—acceptance, revision, or rejection. In cases of divergent reviewer opinions, an additional expert may be consulted. Authors receive the decision along with anonymized reviewer feedback, with the initial verdict typically issued within one month. Accepted manuscripts are scheduled for publication within 4 (four) to 8 (eight) weeks post-acceptance.
5. Revision and Resubmission
   Authors required to revise their manuscripts must address reviewer comments thoroughly, submit a revised version with highlighted changes, and include a response letter. The revision timeline is two weeks for minor edits and four weeks for substantial revisions. Major revisions are subject to re-evaluation by the original reviewers to ensure adequacy of the improvements.
6. Finalization for Publication
   Once accepted, manuscripts must be submitted in their final format for copyediting and layout preparation prior to publication.

Through this meticulous peer review framework, The Al-Amwal: Journal of Islamic Economic Law affirms its commitment to publishing research that exemplifies academic excellence and integrity.