Reconceptualizing Arabic Language Learning in Madrasahs in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/pijies.v5i2.4207Keywords:
arabic language learning, madrasah, artificial intelligence, generative ai, islamic educationAbstract
The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming how languages are taught and learned, yet Arabic language instruction in Indonesian madrasahs remains largely organized around grammar memorization, textual decoding, and teacher-centered delivery. This article reconceptualizes Arabic language learning in madrasahs in the age of AI. Employing a library research design, it synthesizes peer-reviewed studies, policy documents, and authoritative books on AI in education, computer-assisted language learning, Arabic pedagogy, Arabic natural language processing, and Islamic educational thought. The data were analyzed through content analysis and thematic analysis. The findings reveal four interrelated shifts: (1) from an instrumental view of Arabic to a human-centered purpose that joins communicative competence, Islamic textual literacy, and AI literacy; (2) from a standard-only, fragmented content model to a layered, usage-oriented one that recognizes diglossia and classical heritage texts; (3) from transmission-based teaching to dialogic, human–AI collaborative pedagogy grounded in scaffolding, interaction, and formative feedback; and (4) from technical adoption to accountable governance that embeds verification (tabayyun), data protection, academic integrity, and equity. The article proposes the HUDA framework (Human-centered, Usage-oriented, Dialogic, Accountable), in which the teacher acts as learning designer and moral exemplar. It concludes that AI can enrich Arabic learning in madrasahs only when its integration is pedagogically purposeful, linguistically critical, and ethically bounded.
References
Abdel Haleem, M. A. S. (Trans.). (2004). The Qur’an. Oxford University Press.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1980). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia.
Al-Batal, M. (Ed.). (2018). Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum. Georgetown University Press.
Antoun, W., Baly, F., & Hajj, H. (2020). AraBERT: Transformer-based model for Arabic language understanding. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Processing Tools (pp. 9–15). European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2020.osact-1.2
Ardiansyah, A. A., & Muhammad, A. (2020). Implementation of integrative Arabic grammar (Nahwu & Sharaf) curriculum in Islamic boarding school. Izdihar: Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v3i3.13264
Azra, A. (2004). The origins of Islamic reformism in Southeast Asia: Networks of Malay-Indonesian and Middle Eastern ʿulamaʾ in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Allen & Unwin; University of Hawai’i Press.
Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi. (2020). Strategi nasional kecerdasan artifisial Indonesia 2020–2045 [Indonesia’s national strategy for artificial intelligence 2020–2045].
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). MIT Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., ... Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901). Curran Associates.
Darwish, K., Habash, N., Abbas, M., Al-Khalifa, H., Al-Natsheh, H. T., Bouamor, H., Bouzoubaa, K., Cavalli-Sforza, V., El-Beltagy, S. R., El-Hajj, W., Jarrar, M., & Mubarak, H. (2021). A panoramic survey of natural language processing in the Arab world. Communications of the ACM, 64(4), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447735
Effendy, A. F. (2005). Metodologi pengajaran bahasa Arab. Misykat.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Farghaly, A., & Shaalan, K. (2009). Arabic natural language processing: Challenges and solutions. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, 8(4), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1145/1644879.1644881
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Habash, N. Y. (2010). Introduction to Arabic natural language processing. Morgan & Claypool. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00277ED1V01Y201008HLT010
Halstead, J. M. (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284510
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hefner, R. W. (Ed.). (2009). Making modern Muslims: The politics of Islamic education in Southeast Asia. University of Hawai’i Press.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Keputusan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia Nomor 183 Tahun 2019 tentang Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Bahasa Arab pada Madrasah [Decree of the Minister of Religious Affairs No. 183 of 2019 on the Islamic religious education and Arabic curriculum in madrasahs].
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2022). Keputusan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia Nomor 347 Tahun 2022 tentang Pedoman Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka pada Madrasah [Decree of the Minister of Religious Affairs No. 347 of 2022 on guidelines for implementing the Independent Curriculum in madrasahs].
Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264516
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315581420
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, J. (2007). Arabic diglossia: Teaching only the standard variety is a disservice. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, 14, 111–122.
Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi [Law No. 27 of 2022 on personal data protection].
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryding, K. C. (2013). Teaching and learning Arabic as a foreign language: A guide for teachers. Georgetown University Press.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
van Bruinessen, M. (1995). Kitab kuning, pesantren dan tarekat: Tradisi-tradisi Islam di Indonesia. Mizan.
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008). Curran Associates.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P.-S., Cheng, M., Glaese, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., Kenton, Z., Brown, S., Hawkins, W., Stepleton, T., Biles, C., Birhane, A., Haas, J., Rimell, L., Hendricks, L. A., ... Gabriel, I. (2021). Ethical and social risks of harm from language models (arXiv:2112.04359). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.04359
Yang, H., & Kyun, S. (2022). The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 180–210. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7492
Younes, M. (2015). The integrated approach to Arabic instruction. Routledge.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zed, M. (2004). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kartini Kartini

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Copyright Retention & First Publication: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. (2) Post-Publication Distribution: Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. (3) Pre-print & Online Posting: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This is an open access article under the