The Relationship Between Understanding and Use of Sundanese Speech Levels (Undak-Usuk Basa) Among Elementary School Students

Authors

  • Ranu Sudarmansyah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Asep Rudi Nurjaman Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Deden Pradeka Teknik Komputer, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • M. Ridwan Sutisna Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nurul Hidayah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Uus Kusnadi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Muh. Husen Arifin Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Diki Somantri Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Yulia Nuraeni Pebriani Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/pijies.v9i3.12416

Keywords:

Undak-Usuk Basa, Speech Levels, Sundanese Language, Elementary School, SDGs

Abstract

Quality education (SDG 4) requires the internalization of cultural values as the foundation for character development among elementary school students. This study aims to analyze the relationship between students’ cognitive understanding of Sundanese language levels and their contextual written production. The research method used was a quantitative correlational study with a saturated sample of 20 fifth-grade students at SDN Gunungwangi, Majalengka Regency. Data were collected through an objective multiple-choice test for conceptual understanding and a structured written production test for language application, both validated through expert judgment. Descriptive results indicated a mean score of 78.00 for understanding and 76.00 for written production. Inferential analysis yielded a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.794 (p < 0.001) with a coefficient of determination of r2 = 0.630, falling into the strong category based on standard correlation criteria (Guilford), indicating a strong and significant positive relationship between the level of understanding and the written application of Sundanese speech levels. These findings are consistent with initiatives supporting cultural heritage preservation (SDG 11.4), although item-level analysis revealed a pronounced drop in complex honorific registers (55% accuracy). Constrained by a small sample size (N = 20), a single-school site, and written assessment measures, these results imply a critical pedagogical need to focus instruction on complex honorific vocabulary to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical competence.

References

Adela, D., & Al-Akmam, M. (2024). Upaya pelestarian budaya Sunda di sekolah dasar. Jurnal BELAINDIKA (Pembelajaran dan Inovasi Pendidikan), 6(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.52005/belaindika.v6i2.153

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451001

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2011). Kewarganegaraan, suku bangsa, agama, dan bahasa sehari-hari penduduk Indonesia: Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2010. Badan Pusat Statistik RI.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Potret sensus penduduk 2020 menuju satu data kependudukan Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik RI.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Chintawidy, P. A., & Sartini, N. (2022). A cross-cultural pragmatics study of request strategies and politeness in Javanese and Sundanese. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 4(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v4i2.152-166

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (edisi ke-5). SAGE Publications.

Djajasudarma, T. F., Idik, S., & Sudaryat, Y. (1997). Tata krama basa Sunda. Pustaka Setia.

Faturohman, O., Sudrajat, A., & Ghoer, H. F. (2022). Manajemen kurikulum pembelajaran muatan lokal bahasa daerah untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berbahasa Sunda. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(4), 1233–1245. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i4.551

Fauziah, D., & Afdhal, A. (2025). Negotiating language policy and local practice: Multilingual challenges in a Sundanese classroom in Indonesia. Jurnal Tahuri, 22(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.30598/tahurivol22issue1page52-67

Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (edisi ke-3). McGraw-Hill.

Hidayatullah, A., Anshori, D. S., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2025). Sundanese cultural values in paribasa as a guide to language politeness: An ethnopragmapedagogy approach. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(3), 1120–1138. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i3.41872

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. Dalam J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (hlm. 269–293). Penguin Books.

Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell Publishing.

Kulsum, U., Darnis, A. D., & Asdari, A. (2023). Language shift and endangerment of Sundanese Banten dialect in South Tangerang. Insaniyat: Journal of Islam and Humanities, 7(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.15408/insaniyat.v7i2.28905

Kuswari, U., Koswara, D., & Haerudin, D. (2024). Pendidikan dan pelatihan model penilaian keterampilan berbahasa Sunda bagi guru bahasa Sunda. Dimasatra: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.17509/dm.v4i2.72632

Prasetyo, T., Humaira, M. A., Maryani, N., & Nurazizah, R. (2022). Model Narasikom: Meningkatkan keterampilan berbicara bahasa Sunda siswa kelas rendah. DIDAKTIKA TAUHIDI: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 9(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.30997/dt.v9i2.6910

Salsa, S. B. A. Z., Abdullah, M. N. A., Morimoto, E., & Wilodati, W. (2025). Undak usuk basa as a reflection of social hierarchy in Sundanese communication. AL MA'ARIEF: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Budaya, 7(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.35905/almaarief.v7i2.13092

Sudaryat, Y., Prawirasumantri, A., & Yudibrata, K. (2007). Tata basa Sunda kiwari. Yrama Widya.

Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional intervention relies on cognitive and sociolinguistic theories. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263

UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO.

Published

2026-10-22

How to Cite

Sudarmansyah, R., Rudi Nurjaman, A., Pradeka, D., Sutisna, M. R., Hidayah, N., Kusnadi, U., … Pebriani, Y. N. (2026). The Relationship Between Understanding and Use of Sundanese Speech Levels (Undak-Usuk Basa) Among Elementary School Students. Pedagogik Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 9(3), 909–926. https://doi.org/10.24256/pijies.v9i3.12416

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.