Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis tentang Model Argument-Driven Inquiry dan Dampaknya terhadap Argumentasi Ilmiah Murid

Authors

  • Indah Timur Wati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Winarto Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Laifa Rahmawati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/tunascendekia.v9i1.12832

Keywords:

Argument-Driven Inquiry, argumentasi, sains, berpikir kritis, literasi, SLR

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan memetakan tren penelitian tentang penerapan Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam pembelajaran sains serta dampak yang dilaporkan terhadap keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah murid. Kajian menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan mengacu pada pedoman PRISMA 2020. Penelusuran dilakukan pada basis data Scopus dengan kombinasi kata kunci “Argument-Driven Inquiry”, “ADI”, “Scientific Argumentation”, dan “Scientific Argument” pada judul, abstrak, dan kata kunci. Dari 388 rekaman yang teridentifikasi, 32 artikel memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Jumlah publikasi per tahun kecil (2–5 artikel), sehingga belum menunjukkan tren yang dapat disimpulkan secara kuat. Indonesia (8 artikel) dan Turki (7 artikel) menjadi negara dengan publikasi terbanyak. Mixed methods merupakan pendekatan yang paling banyak digunakan (13 artikel), dan jenjang SMP/SMA mendominasi subjek penelitian (17 artikel). Variabel yang paling sering dikaji adalah keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah, diikuti berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep. Studi yang dianalisis umumnya melaporkan dampak positif ADI terhadap kemampuan murid menyusun klaim, menggunakan bukti, dan membangun penalaran, tetapi kesimpulan ini perlu ditafsirkan hati-hati karena kajian tidak menilai kualitas studi maupun ukuran efek. Tantangan implementasi yang dilaporkan meliputi keterbatasan waktu, kesiapan murid, dan kompetensi guru dalam memfasilitasi diskusi ilmiah.

References

Bossér, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students’ positioning in the classroom: A study of teacher–student interactions in a socioscientific issue context. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9627-1

Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J.-Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998–2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1

Erenler, S., Cetin, P. S., & Eymur, G. (2025). Impact of Argument-Driven Inquiry activities on pre-service science teachers’ views of the nature of scientific inquiry in the context of climate change education. Science & Education, 34(4), 2251–2281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00512-4

Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2018). A critical review of scientific argumentation in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353

Hendratmoko, A. F., Fauziah, A. N. M., Susiyawati, E., Astriani, D., Nurita, T., Martini, Erman, Septaria, K., Fi’aunillah, T. K., & Boey, A. (2026). Integrating ChatGPT-driven self-assessment and Debate Based on Inquiry Learning (DBOIL) to enhance students’ argumentation skills: Leveraging AI for quality science learning aligned with SDG 4. E3S Web of Conferences, 696, Article 02005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669602005

Kaçar, S., & Balım, A. G. (2021). Investigating the effects of Argument-Driven Inquiry method in science course on secondary school students’ levels of conceptual understanding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 816–845. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.105

Lenkauskaitė, J., Colomer, J., & Bubnys, R. (2020). Students’ social construction of knowledge through cooperative learning. Sustainability, 12(22), Article 9606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229606

McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Supporting grade 5–8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence, and reasoning framework for talk and writing. Pearson.

Melta, D., Azhar, M., Yohandri, Y., Arsih, F., & Razak, A. (2024). Argument-Driven Inquiry learning model to improve students’ argumentation skills in science learning: Systematic literature review. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v12i1.5843

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Ping, I. L. L., & Osman, K. (2019). Laboratory-modified Argument Driven Inquiry (Lab-MADI) module: Content validity process. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.16867

Rapanta, C. (2021). Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curriculum? Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, Article 103404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103404

Salsabila, C. T., Muttaqiin, A., & Putri, R. E. (2025). The effect of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) model on students’ argumentation skills in science learning. ISER (Indonesian Science Education Research), 7(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.24114/iser.v7i1.68079

Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421

Sampson, V., & Walker, J. P. (2012). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help undergraduate students write to learn by learning to write in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1443–1485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667581

Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-06

How to Cite

Timur Wati, I., Winarto, & Rahmawati, L. (2026). Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis tentang Model Argument-Driven Inquiry dan Dampaknya terhadap Argumentasi Ilmiah Murid. Tunas Cendekia : Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 9(1), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.24256/tunascendekia.v9i1.12832

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Tunas Cendekia : Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Indah Timur Wati, Winarto, Laifa Rahmawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Please find the rights and licenses in Tunas Cedekia. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.

1. License

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

2. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

Tunas Cedekia's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Tunas Cedekia permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Tunas Cedekia on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Tunas Cedekia will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Tunas Cedekia will only communicate with the corresponding author.

5. Miscellaneous

Tunas Cedekia will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Tunas Cedekia's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.

 

Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.

Tunas Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)