Peningkatan Kelancaran Membaca melalui Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) pada Siswa dengan Kesulitan Membaca di Sekolah Inklusif

Authors

  • Nor Ismayah Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Luar Biasa, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Pujaningsih Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Luar Biasa, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/tunascendekia.v9i2.12082

Keywords:

Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS), kelancaran membaca, WCPM, sekolah inklusif

Abstract

Kemampuan membaca merupakan keterampilan dasar yang menentukan keberhasilan peserta didik dalam mengikuti pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Hasil asesmen awal pada siswa kelas IV SD Negeri Sei Telang menunjukkan masih adanya siswa yang mengalami kesulitan membaca, ditandai dengan rendahnya Words Correct Per Minute (WCPM), akurasi membaca, fluency, dan prosodi sehingga berdampak pada rendahnya pemahaman bacaan. Meskipun Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) telah terbukti efektif meningkatkan kemampuan membaca, penerapannya pada siswa dengan kesulitan membaca di sekolah dasar inklusif masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan meningkatkan kelancaran membaca melalui penerapan PALS. Penelitian menggunakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) model Kemmis dan McTaggart yang dilaksanakan dalam dua siklus. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas empat siswa kelas IV, dengan dua siswa sebagai subjek utama (tutee) dan dua siswa sebagai tutor sebaya. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes kelancaran membaca, observasi, dokumentasi, dan catatan lapangan. Kelancaran membaca diukur berdasarkan indikator WCPM, akurasi membaca, fluency, dan prosodi, kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PALS meningkatkan kelancaran membaca secara bertahap pada setiap siklus. Subjek EDW mengalami peningkatan WCPM dari 45 menjadi 50 kata benar per menit, akurasi membaca dari 84,9% menjadi 94,3%, fluency dari 66,7% menjadi 91,7%, dan prosodi dari 58,3% menjadi 91,7%. Subjek RJ mengalami peningkatan WCPM dari 47 menjadi 51 kata benar per menit, akurasi membaca dari 88,7% menjadi 96,2%, fluency dari 66,7% menjadi 91,7%, dan prosodi dari 66,7% menjadi 91,7%. Keterlaksanaan pembelajaran meningkat dari 77% menjadi 93% dan partisipasi siswa juga mengalami peningkatan. Disimpulkan bahwa PALS efektif meningkatkan kelancaran membaca melalui latihan membaca berulang, pemodelan oleh tutor sebaya, umpan balik langsung, dan interaksi kolaboratif yang mendukung otomatisasi pengenalan kata pada siswa dengan kesulitan membaca di sekolah dasar inklusif.

References

Ahmed, Y., Miciak, J., Taylor, W. P., & Francis, D. J. (2022). Structure altering effects of a multicomponent reading intervention, an application of the Direct and Inferential Mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in upper elementary grades. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219421995904

Al Otaiba, S., McMaster, K., Wanzek, J., & Zaru, M. W. (2023). What we know and need to know about literacy interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties and disabilities, including dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.458

Boucher, A. N., Bhat, B. H., Clemens, N. H., Vaughn, S., & O’Donnell, K. (2024). Reading interventions for students in grades 3 to 12 with significant word reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194231207556

Chung, W. L. (2022). Oral reading prosody and the relation with reading abilities, a comparison of two rating scales. Reading and Writing, 37(4), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10322-1

Chung, W. L., & Bidelman, G. M. (2022). Acoustic features of oral reading prosody and the relation with reading fluency and reading comprehension in Taiwanese children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(1), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00252

Didion, L., & Toste, J. R. (2021). Data mountain, self-monitoring, goal setting, and positive attributions to enhance the oral reading fluency of elementary students with or at-risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194211043482

Filderman, M. J., Austin, C. R., Boucher, A. N., O’Donnell, K., & Swanson, E. A. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of reading comprehension interventions on the reading comprehension outcomes of struggling readers in third through 12th grades. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211050860

Filderman, M. J., & Toste, J. R. (2022). Effects of varying levels of data use to intensify a multisyllabic word reading intervention for upper elementary students with or at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(5), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194211048405

Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies, promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390010401

Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Svenson, E., Yen, L., Al Otaiba, S., Yang, N., McMaster, K. L., Prentice, K., Kazdan, S., & Saenz, L. (2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading, extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200103

Hall, C., Dahl-Leonard, K., Cho, E., Solari, E. J., Capin, P., Conner, C. L., Henry, A. R., Cook, L., Hayes, L., Vargas, I., Richmond, C. L., & Kehoe, K. F. (2023). Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58, 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.477

Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms, a valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.7.3

Hasnani, H., & Ismail, A. (2020). Enhancing students’ reading ability through Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS). Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 23(2), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2020v23n2i6

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Nese, J. F. T. (2022). Comparing the growth and predictive performance of a traditional oral reading fluency measure with an experimental novel measure. AERA Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211071112

Rasinski, T. (2020). The fluent reader: Oral and silent reading strategies for building fluency, word recognition, and comprehension. Scholastic.

Sanches-Ferreira, M., Martins, H., Valquaresma, A., & Alves, S. (2022). Implementing an online peer tutoring intervention to promote reading skills of elementary students, effects on fluency and accuracy. Frontiers in Education, 7, 983332. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.983332

Steinle, P. K., Stevens, E., & Vaughn, S. (2022). Fluency interventions for struggling readers in grades 6 to 12, a research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219421991249

Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading, a meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250040801

VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Solomon, B. G. (2023). Valid outcomes for screening and progress monitoring, fluency is superior to accuracy in curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology, 38(3), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000528

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Widyaningrum, W. (2020). Improving students’ reading comprehension skill using Peer-Assisted Learning Strategy. KREDO: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, 3(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v3i2.4225

Wolters, A. P., Kim, Y. S. G., & Szura, J. W. (2022). Is reading prosody related to reading comprehension? A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1850733

Zimmermann, L. M., Reed, D. K., & Aloe, A. M. (2021). A meta-analysis of non-repetitive reading fluency interventions for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519855058

Downloads

Published

2026-08-12

How to Cite

Ismayah, N., & Pujaningsih. (2026). Peningkatan Kelancaran Membaca melalui Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) pada Siswa dengan Kesulitan Membaca di Sekolah Inklusif. Tunas Cendekia : Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 9(2), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.24256/tunascendekia.v9i2.12082

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.