Analisis Kebutuhan Guru terhadap Asesmen Autentik PAUD Berbasis Artificial Intelligence dengan Pendekatan Human-in-the-Loop
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/tunascendekia.v10i1.12926Keywords:
asesmen autentik, PAUD, artificial intelligence, human-in-the-loop, analisis kebutuhanAbstract
Asesmen autentik dalam Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (PAUD) menghasilkan beragam data perkembangan anak yang perlu diorganisasikan dan diinterpretasikan secara sistematis untuk mendukung penyusunan laporan perkembangan. Namun, pengelolaan data asesmen yang terkumpul selama satu semester dan penyusunan narasi perkembangan masih menjadi tantangan bagi guru. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kebutuhan guru dalam penerapan asesmen autentik berbasis Artificial Intelligence (AI) dengan pendekatan Human-in-the-Loop (HITL). Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan Research and Development (R&D) dengan model ADDIE yang dibatasi pada tahap Analysis. Data dikumpulkan melalui Focus Group Discussion (FGD) dengan melibatkan dua orang kepala sekolah dari dua satuan PAUD dan dianalisis secara kualitatif melalui kondensasi data, penyajian data, penarikan kesimpulan dan verifikasi, serta analisis lintas lokasi. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi dua kebutuhan utama, yaitu pengorganisasian data asesmen yang terkumpul selama satu semester dan penyusunan narasi perkembangan anak secara sistematis. Guru membutuhkan dukungan AI untuk mengelompokkan data dari catatan anekdot, hasil karya, dan dokumentasi berdasarkan topik, subtopik, dan aspek perkembangan, serta menghasilkan draf awal narasi perkembangan. Namun, guru tetap perlu memiliki kewenangan untuk memeriksa, menyunting, menyetujui, menolak, dan mengambil alih keluaran AI. Penelitian ini menghasilkan peta kebutuhan pengguna dan persyaratan awal sistem sebagai dasar perancangan asesmen autentik berbasis AI-HITL. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa integrasi AI dalam asesmen PAUD perlu berorientasi pada dukungan pengolahan data dengan tetap mempertahankan guru sebagai pengambil keputusan profesional.
References
Anggereni, D. T. (2025). Pentingnya Asesmen Berbasis Perkembangan dalam Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. 5(1).
Arslan, N., & Akar, H. (2026). Teachers’ Views on Workload: Effects and Expectations. International Journal of Progressive Studies in Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21082164
Bittner, K., Highfield, K., & Thompson, N. (2026). Digital Technologies for Early Childhood Assessment and Evaluation: Emerging Implications in a GenAI World. AI, Brain and Child, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44436-026-00032-8
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Fadlilah, A. N. (2021). Hambatan Pelaksamaan Asesmen Informal dalam Pembelajaran PAUD. Cakrawala Dini: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 12(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v12i1.28675
Harahap, U. M., Harefa, S., Sinambela, E. T., & Yus, A. (2026). Optimalisasi Asesmen Anekdot untuk Penilaian Autentik Perkembangan Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Tematik, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.24114/jt.v15i1.69859
He, C., Huang, Y., Lan, H., He, J., Fan, X., Zhang, D., Lin, J., Liao, M., & Wang, C. (2026). AI-assisted assessment of higher education quality: A visual analytical approach. Visual Informatics, 10(3), 100306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2026.100306
Hidayat, W., & Andriani, A. (2020). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Cakrawala Dini: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 11(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v11i2.24922
Judijanto, L., Muhammadiah, M., & Utami, R. N. (2024). Metodologi Research and Development (Teori dan Penerapan Metodologi RnD). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Knauf, H. (2020). Documentation Strategies: Pedagogical Documentation from the Perspective of Early Childhood Teachers in New Zealand and Germany. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00979-9
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th edn). SAGE Publications.
Lee, S., & Han, J. (2026). Scaling Early Literacy Screening for Sustainable Education: A Cloud-Native Architecture Integrating Machine Learning and Human-in-the-Loop Validation. Sustainability, 18(10), 5142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105142
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education (Open Ideas No. 3). Pearson Education. https://www.pearson.com/corporate/about-pearson/what-we-do/innovation/smarter-digital-tools/intelligence-unleashed.html
Mastikawati, M., Baharun, H., Wahid, A. H., Solehatin, S., & Adawiyah, R. (2022). Strengthening Early Childhood Learning Outcomes through Authentic Assessment of Students. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(5), 4547–4556. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.2525
Mi, Y. (2026). PreEduAI: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Automated Preschool Curriculum Development. IEEE Access, 14, 5255–5267. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3646282
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Edition 3). Sage.
Mosqueira-Rey, E., Hernández-Pereira, E., Alonso-Ríos, D., Bobes-Bascarán, J., & Fernández-Leal, Á. (2023). Human-in-the-loop machine learning: A state of the art. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(4), 3005–3054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10246-w
Nabilah, N., Karma, I. N., & Husniati, H. (2021). Identifikasi Kesulitan Guru dalam Melaksanakan Penilaian Autentik pada Kurikulum 2013 di SDN 50 Cakranegara. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(4), 617–622. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v6i4.298
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2020). Developmentally Appropriate Practice. NAEYC. https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/position-statements/dap-statement_0.pdf
Palmin, B., Anwar, M. R., & Ndeot, F. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Guru TK dalam Mengimplementasikan Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 di Kecamatan Langke Rembong. Jurnal AUDI: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Ilmu Anak Dan Media Informasi PAUD, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.33061/jai.v4i2.3322
Romeo, G., & Conti, D. (2026). Exploring Automation Bias in Human–AI Collaboration: A Review and Implications for Explainable AI. AI & Society, 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02422-7
Rosidah, Pramulia, P., & Susiloningsih, W. (2021). Analisis Kesiapan Guru Mengimplementasikan Asesmen Autentik dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(01), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpd.v12i01.21159
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049
Tretow-Fish, T., & Møller, A. K. (2026). Generative AI in Student Project Reports: Preliminary insights on Patterns of Use and Documentation in Higher Education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning, 15. https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v15.10869
Varier, D., & Yun, S. (2023). A review of research on assessment use: Implications for preparing early childhood educators for data-informed decision-making. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2023.2257157
Wen, J. (2026). Implementing an AI-Assisted Teacher Observation System: A Case Study on Enhancing Preschool Education Quality in Mashan County. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 28(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.400705
Wickens, C. D., Clegg, B. A., Vieane, A. Z., & Sebok, A. L. (2015). Complacency and Automation Bias in the Use of Imperfect Automation. Human Factors, 57(5). https://doi.org/:%2010.1177/0018720815581940
Wijayanti, T. D. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Penilaian Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Daring PAUD selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Satya Widya, 37. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2021.v37.i2.p101-115
Wong, J. M. S. (2026). Designing Trustworthy AI for the Youngest Learners: An Integrated Ethical Framework and Implementation Roadmap. Early Childhood Education Journal, 54(5), 3827–3837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-026-02138-3
Yang, W., Li, H., & Lee, J. C.-K. (2025). Tailoring AI agents for early learning: The Creative Project Approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100473
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kulsum Nur Hayati, Khamim Zarkasih Putro, Pria Dita Anis Wari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in Tunas Cedekia. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Tunas Cedekia's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Tunas Cedekia permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Tunas Cedekia on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Tunas Cedekia will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Tunas Cedekia will only communicate with the corresponding author.
5. Miscellaneous
Tunas Cedekia will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Tunas Cedekia's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
Â
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.
Tunas Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
